Universal gravitation and what it actually meant

It wasn't a theory, it was the introduction of the 'scientific method' under the title of universal gravitation and an attempt to dissolve the boundaries between what men could dream up in their heads on one side and what actually exists on the other . The astronomical hypotheses which comprise the solutions for why planets appear to move the way they do, the Sun ,the moon and stars never lent themselves to an experimental method as it is pure perceptive faculties which make the solutions possible.

Those creatures today who are now trying to pass off predictions as facts are merely followers of the scientific method doctrine and its disruptive agenda which wrecks havoc and chaos with easy to understand principles using imaging and analogies.


It is not possible to begin with a common greenhouse and bump it up to planetary climate no more than it is possible to equate the fall of an apple to planetary dynamics for already the destruction is already obvious.


"Rule III. The qualities of bodies, which admit neither [intensification] nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong to all bodies within the reach of our experiments, are to be esteemed the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever." Newton

The 'rule' became the 'rule of law' which in turn became 'the law of gravitation' hence the many empiricists in this forum rant on about evidence because it is in their heads to associate laws with evidence. The world will be so much different once this disruptive and self-serving agenda is consigned to history as overreaching intellectual greed that has no become an industry.

Readers should not feed or interact with the Gerald Kelleher troll. You will be wasting your time and, more importantly, you will be encouraging Gerald to continue even longer in his self-harming activities.

Gerald, because of the severe and life-long condition from which he suffers, is entirely unable to accept anything that differs from his own bizarre view of the world. Changing his mind is simply not possible neither is getting him to respond to questions.

Equally important is that many regulars remain unconvinced that Gerald really believes most of the crud he keeps chanting out. Some of his favourite topics from the past have been quietly dropped from his menu and this probably reflects the fact that he has finally realised that on that particular issue he was 100% wrong?

The way he endlessly repeats slight variations of the same nonsense is just one symptom of his illness. He quite literally cannot stop himself from posting - it has pretty much become his "life". It is hard to find any evidence that he has an existence outside his handful of trivial obsessions.

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0112/JuSa2000_tezel.gif

An astronomical hypothesis based on those observations was originally that the planets would occasionally accomplish a looping motion when seen from a stationary Earth.

Copernicus introduced a separate hypothesis that the motion of the Earth between the faster moving Venus and the slower moving Mars accounted for these observations.

The experimentalist couldn't get this right and tried to insert a nonsensical solution that does not account for the motions of Jupiter and Saturn seen in the time lapse footage -

"For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct, sometimes stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde. But from the sun they are always seen direct,..." Newton

It is a fallacy that the great insights of astronomy can't be recovered in an era dominated by empiricist thugs who won't admit that a rogue view of retrograde resolution is a signal for something more destructive in terms of the overall ideology.

The analogies like a car moving on a roundabout and watching a slower moving car in an outer lane falling temporarily behind in view can be applied to the time lapse footage in a casual way but this is a long way from a falling apple accounting for planetary dynamics.

The sheer size and scale of the empirical community would make it appear that it will be quite some time before common sense returns to astronomy and its workings free and clear of experimental sciences but eventually it will happen.

Readers should not interact with the Gerald Kelleher troll. You will be wasting your time and, more importantly, you will be encouraging Gerald to continue even longer in his self-harming activities.

Gerald, because of the severe and life-long condition from which he suffers, is unable to accept anything that differs from his own bizarre view of the world. Changing his mind is simply not possible neither is getting him to respond to questions.

Equally important is that most regulars remain unconvinced that Gerald really believes most of the crud he keeps chanting out. Some of his favourite topics from the past have been quietly dropped from his menu and this probably reflects the fact that he has finally realised that on that particular issue he was 100% wrong?

The way he endlessly repeats minor variations of the same nonsense is just one symptom of his illness. He quite literally cannot stop himself from posting - it has pretty much become his "life". It is hard to find any evidence that he has an existence outside his handful of trivial obsessions.