|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LXD55 (10") or Meade Starfinder (12.5") ??
All, We've wanted to acquire a high quality, general purpose telescope for a while, but with the Mars approcah we've decided that timing is now. Budget is $1,000-$1,500 and "goto" is a must. We're comparing a Meade LXD55 10" UHTC coated Schmidt-Newtonian with a Meade Starfinder 12.5" Dobsonian + Magellan goto system. Both street for roughly $1,200, though the LXD has a $650 eyepice deal right now. The immediate use is Mars viewing, but ultimately the scope will seek out both deep sky and solar system. Astrophotography is not something we'll do (if we want photos, we go to the Hubble site!). We like the idea of American optics and build, better resale if necessary, etc.. We live in rural N. California at 3,000' about 50 miles from a major city and have very dark N/E/S skys. West sky glares a bit from the city. Climate is dry. Scope will be used here at home, not really concerned about transportability. On paper, the 12.5" reflector seems a little better than the 10" SN. Comparing these two under the criteria given, which do y'all think would be a better choice for us, and why? Or perhaps there are other options we should consider within our budget? Thanks for your thoughts, Paige |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:15:35 GMT, "Al"
wrote: If you want reasonable quality and GOTO in the same package, you must be prepared to spend a few more bucks...the LXD55 will give you a lot of aggravation! Take my word for it, I've been there. Al Al, Thank you for your thoughts. I've done more chat room research on "goto" scopes and have found some consensus that the Celestron NexStar goto electromechanics are smoother, quieter, and more durable than the Meade LX. Is this you're experience? Anyone? We're now leaning towards larger aperture. Stretching the budget to around $3,000, it's looking like either a Celestron Nexstar 11" GPS or the Meade LX200 10" GPS, both with "special" coatings. Are there any other larger aperture SC GPS scope mfrs in the $3,000 price range? I can't find any. I also can't find consensus on optical quality comparison between these two scopes. Plenty of divergent opinions around. Anyone here have experience with both? Are they close enough in optical quality that a decision really boils down to mount and electromechanics? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
I also can't find consensus on optical quality comparison between
these two scopes. Plenty of divergent opinions around. Anyone here have experience with both? Are they close enough in optical quality that a decision really boils down to mount and electromechanics? There's a good reason, in my opinion, why you can't find a consensus of opinion. The reason is that these scopes are so close in quality that there almost is no difference. You will not go wrong which ever you select...Meade or Celestron. I own a 10" LX200 and also own a Celestron 14" SCT. In my opinion, Celestron has the better optics and Meade has the better mechanicals. Be advised, however, that this statement is really splitting hairs. If I were you, I would go with the C-11, if only for the extra aperture. Al "Paige Turner" wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:15:35 GMT, "Al" wrote: If you want reasonable quality and GOTO in the same package, you must be prepared to spend a few more bucks...the LXD55 will give you a lot of aggravation! Take my word for it, I've been there. Al Al, Thank you for your thoughts. I've done more chat room research on "goto" scopes and have found some consensus that the Celestron NexStar goto electromechanics are smoother, quieter, and more durable than the Meade LX. Is this you're experience? Anyone? We're now leaning towards larger aperture. Stretching the budget to around $3,000, it's looking like either a Celestron Nexstar 11" GPS or the Meade LX200 10" GPS, both with "special" coatings. Are there any other larger aperture SC GPS scope mfrs in the $3,000 price range? I can't find any. I also can't find consensus on optical quality comparison between these two scopes. Plenty of divergent opinions around. Anyone here have experience with both? Are they close enough in optical quality that a decision really boils down to mount and electromechanics? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
"Paige Turner" wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:15:35 GMT, "Al" wrote: If you want reasonable quality and GOTO in the same package, you must be prepared to spend a few more bucks...the LXD55 will give you a lot of aggravation! Take my word for it, I've been there. Al Al, Thank you for your thoughts. I've done more chat room research on "goto" scopes and have found some consensus that the Celestron NexStar goto electromechanics are smoother, quieter, and more durable than the Meade LX. Is this you're experience? Anyone? We're now leaning towards larger aperture. Stretching the budget to around $3,000, it's looking like either a Celestron Nexstar 11" GPS or the Meade LX200 10" GPS, both with "special" coatings. Are there any other larger aperture SC GPS scope mfrs in the $3,000 price range? I can't find any. I also can't find consensus on optical quality comparison between these two scopes. Plenty of divergent opinions around. Anyone here have experience with both? Are they close enough in optical quality that a decision really boils down to mount and electromechanics? Lets put it this way, I sold a Meade 12", to get a Nexstar-11, and reckon the Celestron is better both mechanically and optically (the 12", is too heavy for the mount - the 10", is better in this regard). In 'controller' terms, the Meade is the 'nicer' unit to drive, but the tracking is better on the Celestron (now the motor controller bug is fixed). The Celestron 'standard' tripod, is really inadequate for the scope, for imaging (the Meade GFT, is great). I kept the Meade GFT, and use the Celestron on this when I want to go 'mobile'. However the Celestron is now available with a larger tripod as an option. The Celestron is _much_ easier to handle than the Meade (they actually put the handles in useful positions!...). The 10" Meade is still harder to handle than the 11" Celestron. Internally, the assemblies inside the Celestron, have a much better mechanical finish than those on the Meade, and run smoother. Personally, I would not go back to the Meade, unless they launched something really 'revolutionary' (though I still have two smaller Meade scopes). So I'd buy the Nexstar-11, but get the heavier tripod option. Best Wishes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 20:01:27 +0100, "Roger Hamlett"
wrote: Lets put it this way, I sold a Meade 12", to get a Nexstar-11, and reckon the Celestron is better both mechanically and optically (the 12", is too heavy for the mount - the 10", is better in this regard)..... However the Celestron is now available with a larger tripod as an option.....Personally, I would not go back to the Meade, unless they launched something really 'revolutionary' (though I still have two smaller Meade scopes). So I'd buy the Nexstar-11, but get the heavier tripod option. Thanks for the advice. I'll let you know what we decide. Are Meade and Celestron the only companies in the $3k price range making a 10-12" goto catadioptric? I can't find anyone else. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
"Paige Turner" wrote in message ... On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 20:01:27 +0100, "Roger Hamlett" wrote: Lets put it this way, I sold a Meade 12", to get a Nexstar-11, and reckon the Celestron is better both mechanically and optically (the 12", is too heavy for the mount - the 10", is better in this regard)..... However the Celestron is now available with a larger tripod as an option.....Personally, I would not go back to the Meade, unless they launched something really 'revolutionary' (though I still have two smaller Meade scopes). So I'd buy the Nexstar-11, but get the heavier tripod option. Thanks for the advice. I'll let you know what we decide. Are Meade and Celestron the only companies in the $3k price range making a 10-12" goto catadioptric? I can't find anyone else. Realistically, probably yes. They are the only people doing a 'bundle' as such. There are several companies who would sell you an OTA, but in most cases, the cost would allready be more than the complete Meade/Celestron assemblies, and the mount/controller will then go way beyond your budget. However that having been said, are you 100% confident that the SCT, is the way you want to go?. SCT's, are in some ways great compact telescopes, but are not the 'be all and end all' of astronomy. If you look at 'professional' observatories, they are probably the least common design around! (possibly now, the Ritchie Chretien is the commonest scope, with many older observatories having refractors, modified Newtonians, or the pure 'Schmidt' camera). The SCT, offers a compact package, but a focal length that tends to be high for wide field observation, while low for planetary work. Field curvature is relatively high (this is because of the very short focal length of the primary). The sizes you give, are quite large scopes, making these combinations that though it is fully possible to go 'mobile', will not be a 'casual' mobile systems. Be sure that you understand, both the abilities, and the 'limits' of the SCT before 'taking the plunge'... Best Wishes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:01:41 GMT, "Al"
wrote: Also, whoever told you that Celestron GOTOs are more durable is _not_ giving you the truth. Quieter...yes, smoother...not so sure, durable...definietely not. An all metal gear train isn't preferable and more durable than plastic gears? http://www.scopestuff.com/ss_buckg.htm --- Michael |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
Keep in mind that Meade was the pioneer of GOTO scopes, having built and sold the first one in the early 90s (almost 10 years before Celestron). This gives Meade the advantage of a _lot_ of experience. Also, whoever told you that Celestron GOTOs are more durable is _not_ giving you the truth. Quieter...yes, smoother...not so sure, durable...definietely not. Al Hi Al: Well...not exactly. Celestron was there _first_ with goto with the Compustar series. Celestron couldn't seem to produce these at popular prices, however, and lost interest. Meade picked up this design (by a third party) and used it for the basis of the original LX200s a few years later. Peace, Rod |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
An all metal gear train isn't preferable and more durable than plastic
gears? The only plastic gears that I know of in the LX200 are in the DEC mechanism, and then it's only one or 2 parts that are made of plastic (nylon, which happens to be very strong). I've owned 6 LX200s since 1991 and _never_ had a failure due to plastic gears, so they must work. BTW, did you know that some automotive engines use plastic (nylon) gears in the gear train between crankshaft and camshaft? Al "Michael McCulloch" wrote in message ... On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:01:41 GMT, "Al" wrote: Also, whoever told you that Celestron GOTOs are more durable is _not_ giving you the truth. Quieter...yes, smoother...not so sure, durable...definietely not. An all metal gear train isn't preferable and more durable than plastic gears? http://www.scopestuff.com/ss_buckg.htm --- Michael |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Meade LX200 (10") vs. Celestron NexStar (11")
John La Grou wrote:
One thing I notice is that NexStar and LX200 scopes have 1.25" eyepieces. Why don't they put 2" eyepieces on scopes of this quality? Then they would have to provide a 2" star diagonal, too. I'm sure it's money. The provided 1.25 EPs are not particulary good either. We're definitely leaning towards a Celestron NexStar 11 GPS with fancy coating (and maybe the heavy-duty tripod that Roger suggests). I'm checking to see if we can pick up the scope at the factory. I suspect not. They are two miles from me and definitely not set up that way. I've been there four times in the past two months to drop off and pick up scopes I own for service. Phil |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new focuser for meade 10" starfinder dob | Starstuffed | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 31st 03 10:02 PM |