|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 26, 1:06*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: Fred wants as much public-funded plutonium and other spendy elements as he can get his dirty hands on. *Fred wants a multinational cold war that'll get us into WW3. *Fred doesn't care how risky and spendy energy gets. The Guthball has apparently been snorting Drano again. -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine In other words, you still can't refute a damn thing we say about yourself. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 25, 8:22*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 25, 12:48*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 24, 3:52*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 24, 3:23*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: At least using thorium as reactor fuel is kind of inert by itself, and without considerable modification in some hybrid or composite version of reactor fuel that’s mostly thorium, you couldn’t make a WMD if you had to, much less destroy or even hardly damage the environment from which thorium came from to begin with. Thorium reactors produce fissile material just like any others. Nothing WMD worthy, at least not for hundreds or thousands of years, and that fluid thorium fuel is easily cleanable on the fly. What colossal ignorance! *Thorium in a reactor will capture neutrons and turn into U233. Only on demand, Gee, a nuclear reaction that only occurs when you ask it to? BWAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!! !!!!! ... and U233 is not going to become a serious problem like plutonium and other nasty elements are. U233 is damn as near the perfect material to make atomic bombs from. So much for the "couldn't make a WMD" part of your remark. The all-inclusive cost of burning thorium isn't 10% that of a conventional uranium or MOX fueled reactor that's anything but failsafe. Cite for your claims for costs? Mining, processing, reactor fueling, fuel burning, fuel replenishments, secondary purifying or filtering of that fuel (on the fly as needed), spent fuel management gets practically insignificant, reactor melt downs easily eliminated, absolute minimal environmental impacts and zilch worth of WMD or terrorists issues are all way cheaper, less problematic and failsafe. Do you know what 'cite' means, you dimbulb? Why are you opposed to electric energy customers paying one cent/kwhr of reliably clean and essentially renewable energy? Where did I say I was, you lying little sack? Are you suggesting Earth doesn't have enough thorium, and otherwise needs all the plutonium it can possibly get? Where did I say that, you lying little sack? Are you suggesting our national power grids simply can’t be greatly improved and expanded? Where did I say that, you lying little sack? -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the *soul with evil." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Socrates Your highly Semitic/oligarch actions speak very loud and clear. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 25, 8:17*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 25, 12:48*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 24, 3:52*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 24, 3:23*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: At least using thorium as reactor fuel is kind of inert by itself, and without considerable modification in some hybrid or composite version of reactor fuel that’s mostly thorium, you couldn’t make a WMD if you had to, much less destroy or even hardly damage the environment from which thorium came from to begin with. Thorium reactors produce fissile material just like any others. Nothing WMD worthy, at least not for hundreds or thousands of years, and that fluid thorium fuel is easily cleanable on the fly. What colossal ignorance! *Thorium in a reactor will capture neutrons and turn into U233. Only on demand, Gee, a nuclear reaction that only occurs when you ask it to? BWAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!! !!!!! ... and U233 is not going to become a serious problem like plutonium and other nasty elements are. U233 is damn as near the perfect material to make atomic bombs from. So much for the "couldn't make a WMD" part of your remark. The all-inclusive cost of burning thorium isn't 10% that of a conventional uranium or MOX fueled reactor that's anything but failsafe. Cite for your claims for costs? Mining, processing, reactor fueling, fuel burning, replenishments, secondary purifying or filtering, spent fuel management, reactor melt downs easily eliminated, environmental impacts and zilch worth of WMD or terrorists issues are are all way cheaper, less problematic and failsafe. Why are you opposed to customers paying one cent/kwhr of reliably clean and essentially renewable energy? Where did I say I was? *I was merely pointing out that you had made an outright false and very stupid remark. Are you suggesting Earth doesn't have enough thorium? You should stick somewhere close to what I actually write, Guthball. -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the *soul with evil." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Socrates Have you ever contributed anything of value in your life? (if so, please cite) http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
on a interesting note as of today there are only 3 operating nuke
plasnts in japan. 94% are off line. and many or all may not be restarted. japanese people and many local governments in japan are anti nuke, after seeing the problems of just one plant melting down |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 27, 6:41*am, bob haller wrote:
on a interesting note as of today there are only 3 operating nuke plasnts in japan. 94% are off line. and many or all may not be restarted. japanese people and many local governments in japan are anti nuke, after seeing the problems of just one plant melting down Since the local Energy Mafia controls Japan, and they get to charge as much as it takes for their energy, is perhaps why they could care less. Would you care if getting paid 100+ million dollars per year for the status quo? As is, Japan is screwed. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fog control big brother power power power power! | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 19th 07 06:25 PM |
What if HSF ended in 1975? | Space Cadet | Space Shuttle | 24 | February 21st 04 05:42 AM |
What if HSF ended in 1975? | Space Cadet | History | 26 | February 21st 04 05:42 AM |
What if HSF ended in 1975? | Space Cadet | Policy | 21 | February 21st 04 05:40 AM |
Beagle 2 Search Ended | Ricardo | UK Astronomy | 4 | February 13th 04 03:18 PM |