A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hitting Planets Hard



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 20th 07, 12:16 AM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hitting Planets Hard

OK Uranus was hit so hard (or close encounter) that its tipped over
almost at right angles to its plane in which it orbits Such a hit.
So where are my thoughts going??? well I have a globe of the Earth(most
do) that I'm looking at, I also know our Earth tilts over 23
degrees(axial inclinations) that to me that is a lot?? "but good". Now
here comes the reason for this posting. Earth's "wobble" I say its tilt
and wobble was created by a great hit or very near miss As I'm looking
at the Earth It hit in upper Canada and created "Hudson Bay"
Biggest hit ever. Spacetime of the event 3,2 billion years ago. It hit
when the Earth's surface was forming,and a lime of no macro life. But it
changed how the Earth would evolve. Bert

  #2  
Old January 20th 07, 01:26 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Warhol[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 228
Default Hitting Planets Hard


G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
OK Uranus was hit so hard (or close encounter) that its tipped over
almost at right angles to its plane in which it orbits Such a hit.
So where are my thoughts going??? well I have a globe of the Earth(most
do) that I'm looking at, I also know our Earth tilts over 23
degrees(axial inclinations) that to me that is a lot?? "but good". Now
here comes the reason for this posting. Earth's "wobble" I say its tilt
and wobble was created by a great hit or very near miss As I'm looking
at the Earth It hit in upper Canada and created "Hudson Bay"
Biggest hit ever. Spacetime of the event 3,2 billion years ago. It hit
when the Earth's surface was forming,and a lime of no macro life. But it
changed how the Earth would evolve. Bert


"Earth tilts over 23 degrees(axial inclinations)"

Right and this was the reason for the great floods of "Atlantis" and
the melting of mountains high Ice caps... Noah witnessed this... since
he build the ark for survival... when others where laughing with him...
he warned for Cometh Doom... and than it happenend and the waters
started to rise with more than 2500 meters in 40 day's... and now sea
the levels have risen with 3600 meters since that day of great doom
12500 years ago...

Well the trace of that impact is very good visible... inbetween France
and Spain... one of the three hits, that provoked the tilt of this
planet out of his axe with the sun..

here you have map of Europe.. let see if you can see the impact zone of
Noah's Star...
http://encarta.msn.com/map_701512535/France.html

Let me see, if you are really clever and show me the impact zone...

  #3  
Old January 20th 07, 04:30 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Hagar[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,309
Default Hitting Planets Hard


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
OK Uranus was hit so hard (or close encounter) that its tipped over
almost at right angles to its plane in which it orbits Such a hit.
So where are my thoughts going??? well I have a globe of the Earth(most
do) that I'm looking at, I also know our Earth tilts over 23
degrees(axial inclinations) that to me that is a lot?? "but good". Now
here comes the reason for this posting. Earth's "wobble" I say its tilt
and wobble was created by a great hit or very near miss As I'm looking
at the Earth It hit in upper Canada and created "Hudson Bay"
Biggest hit ever. Spacetime of the event 3,2 billion years ago. It hit
when the Earth's surface was forming,and a lime of no macro life. But it
changed how the Earth would evolve. Bert


Beeeert, first off, I think we can say that in the early Solar System all
planets orbited the Sun with their axis of rotation perpendicular to their
orbital plane. It is also now commonly accepted that the Earth was hit by a
Mars sized planet early on, about 4 Bn years ago, which spun off the Moon
and the rest of the debris coalesced back to the Earth and/or the new Moon.
That impact could have imparted the +- 23 degree tilt of the Earth's axis.
The newly created Moon then locked it into place, safe for a small wobble of
a few degrees.
On the other hand, Mars has no Moons to speak off (the Wal-Mart sized Deimos
and Phobos don't really exert any influence) and its axis slowly drifts all
over the 360 degree circumference.
It seems that Uranus took a much harder hit, but being composed mostly of
ice, it didn't disintegrate and reassemble like the Earth, but tilted,
sloshed around a little and now the South Pole is pointing directly at the
Sun.

  #4  
Old January 20th 07, 02:02 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hitting Planets Hard

Hagar(not so horrible) Never heard about all that drifting of Mars axis.
Its so much like earth It tilt is also over 23 degrees,and rotates in
24hours and 37 minutes. My post was trying to tie in tilt of Earth and
even Mars by using the same theory about Uranus's tilt. Don't like the
hit theory about Moon coming out of the Earth. Its based on bad science
Bert

  #5  
Old January 21st 07, 06:01 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Scott Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Hitting Planets Hard

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Hagar(not so horrible) Never heard about all that drifting of Mars axis.
Its so much like earth It tilt is also over 23 degrees,and rotates in
24hours and 37 minutes. My post was trying to tie in tilt of Earth and
even Mars by using the same theory about Uranus's tilt. Don't like the
hit theory about Moon coming out of the Earth. Its based on bad science
Bert


Actually, it is based on well understood science. Computer simulations
from different coders yield similar results based on that same science.
And, it is good science on a level you will never understand. And,
interestingly enough, this same science helps to explain the newly
discovered satellites of Pluto. Consistency is the hallmark of testing
science.

Your proposal, on the other hand, is based (as most of your posts) on
poorly understood science. But, at least this post is more related to
the topic of this group than others you have submitted recently.

As to Uranus, likely its tilt occured during its formation phase, not
after it was completely formed. This would require a smaller impact, in
line with the types of impacts one would expect in a swarm of particles
expected to exist in the torus of material that may eventually have
formed our solar system.
  #6  
Old January 21st 07, 08:38 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hitting Planets Hard

Scott There is nothing I ever posted that you will ever say is good
science. You even know when Uranus was hit(early times) So tell me why
that is reality? Tell us why the Moon has little iron,as compared to
Earth Tell us why it has many rare elements and little found on the
Earth. You are a known parrot and the thinking of others is the only
thinking possible for you. You would rather be nasty to people that can
think with their own wit,for you have no wit of your own. Sad but so
very true,as your posts have proven over the years. The sadist part is
you just don't evolve. You are a sorry dust bunny Bert

  #7  
Old January 22nd 07, 10:22 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Scott Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Hitting Planets Hard

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott There is nothing I ever posted that you will ever say is good
science. You even know when Uranus was hit(early times) So tell me why
that is reality? Tell us why the Moon has little iron,as compared to
Earth Tell us why it has many rare elements and little found on the
Earth. You are a known parrot and the thinking of others is the only
thinking possible for you. You would rather be nasty to people that can
think with their own wit,for you have no wit of your own. Sad but so
very true,as your posts have proven over the years. The sadist part is
you just don't evolve. You are a sorry dust bunny Bert


The operative word here is "think", something foreign to you based on
your posts. The collisional-ejection theory can be found explained all
over the net as well as in any good college-level textbook. I have
pointed some of these sites out to you in the past and you choose to
ignore them - appropriate since you lack the intelligence to
scientifically refute them.

Instead you blather like an idiot, content to see your words posted for
all the world to see. If you don't like the comments such blathering
illicits, there is a simple solution - stop blathering.

And, until you can put together scientific thought in your posts, I will
continue to point out your inadequacies. Welcome to the real world.
  #8  
Old January 22nd 07, 10:54 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hitting Planets Hard

Scott You have no right to criticism. Your just a low wit parrot. Get
lost Bert

  #9  
Old January 23rd 07, 05:38 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Scott Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Hitting Planets Hard

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott You have no right to criticism. Your just a low wit parrot. Get
lost Bert


Forget it. I am going to continue to monitor your inaneness, pointing
it out whenever possible. Your credibility is basically shot in this
group, save for the sorry souls that come to your rescue from time to
time, none of which have any more wit than you.

And, once again, you fail to rise to the challenge - if the
collisional-ejection theory is so riddled with bad science, point it
out. Show all us big bad astronomers you have an insight well beyond
our own. Of course, you can't. You simply wave your hands, make
pronouncements, and assume everyone will agree with you because of your
proclamations. Science doesn't work that way.

So, go ahead, disprove the theory. That is how real science is done.

Oh, and by the way, seems you can't keep from putting more off-topic
trash in this group. That in itself will keep me picking on you. So,
if you want me off your back, keep on topic (though you lack the
intellegence to do that).


  #10  
Old January 23rd 07, 10:56 AM posted to alt.astronomy
nightbat[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,217
Default Hitting Planets Hard

nightbat wrote

Scott Miller wrote:

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Scott You have no right to criticism. Your just a low wit parrot. Get
lost Bert



Complaining Scotty
Forget it. I am going to continue to monitor your inaneness, pointing
it out whenever possible. Your credibility is basically shot in this
group, save for the sorry souls that come to your rescue from time to
time, none of which have any more wit than you.

And, once again, you fail to rise to the challenge - if the
collisional-ejection theory is so riddled with bad science, point it
out. Show all us big bad astronomers you have an insight well beyond
our own. Of course, you can't. You simply wave your hands, make
pronouncements, and assume everyone will agree with you because of your
proclamations. Science doesn't work that way.

So, go ahead, disprove the theory. That is how real science is done.

Oh, and by the way, seems you can't keep from putting more off-topic
trash in this group. That in itself will keep me picking on you. So,
if you want me off your back, keep on topic (though you lack the
intellegence to do that).



nightbat

Boys, boys, Bert, Scott, stop fighting, please, sheesh! The
astronomy fans are watching! Come on , you're frightening the possible
listening school children and lay folks who you're very trying to
enlighten, please! Calm down, nothing in science is written in stone
guys, lighten up! Remember even our beloved Pluto former exoplanet
mainstream coffeeboys planet class taken right from under our very eyes,
oh mercy! You brilliant guys, common on, give it a rest. Scott please
learn to respect differing opinions and alt theories, and Officer Major
Bert, please remember your lofty Science Officer position now.

Sheesh, you guys,
the nightbat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asteroid hitting Earth in 98 years Claudio Grondi UK Astronomy 5 March 10th 06 03:59 AM
Meteorite seen hitting Moon Rich Amateur Astronomy 3 December 25th 05 07:32 PM
Orphaned Planets: It's a Hard Knock Life Jason H. SETI 1 March 23rd 05 02:47 PM
three Objects hitting Sun before each of three last flares Solar 2 October 29th 03 03:02 AM
Comets Hitting Head On G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 2 October 9th 03 09:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.