Japanese nuke power has nearly ended

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to
reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear
power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan.

The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection.

When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of
service.

Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations.

In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't
decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear
reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines
that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident.

Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear
reactors in their areas back online.

All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to
undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest.

If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54
nuclear reactors shut down.

Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Jan 12, 6:14*pm, Dan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/20120113_01.html

On Jan 12, 3:14*pm, Dan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Time and choice will determine what comes.
It is quite mess both with the plants lost, land
contaminated, and people exposed. There are
aspects of cover up in the standard narrative.
Obsolete reactors in an earthquake zone and
a tsumami zone as well, not good. And coast
of the USA has its reactors. I can't speak to their
design. Can you?

On Jan 13, 2:09*am, |"
wrote:
On Jan 12, 3:14*pm, Dan wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Time and choice will determine what comes.
It is quite mess both with the plants lost, land
contaminated, and people exposed. There are
aspects of cover up in the standard narrative.
Obsolete reactors in an earthquake zone and
a tsumami zone as well, not good. And coast
of the USA has its reactors. I can't speak to their
design. Can you?

Shortly after japans disaster the NRC said the US has the same
problems with its plants.

there are some reports the plants were damaged by the earthquake badly
and already lost befire the wave hit

On Jan 13, 6:35*am, bob haller wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:09*am, |"









wrote:
On Jan 12, 3:14*pm, Dan wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Time and choice will determine what comes.
It is quite mess both with the plants lost, land
contaminated, and people exposed. There are
aspects of cover up in the standard narrative.
Obsolete reactors in an earthquake zone and
a tsumami zone as well, not good. And coast
of the USA has its reactors. I can't speak to their
design. Can you?

Shortly after japans disaster the NRC said the US has the same
problems with its plants.

there are some reports the plants were damaged by the earthquake badly
and already lost before the wave hit

No doubt that your Big Energy owned government of Japan has no
intentions of ever being the least bit honest about anything related
to this fiasco.

How many in Japan get to starve to death or having to commit suicide
each and every day because of the badly inflated cost of everything
that goes along with their top to bottom corruption?

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Jan 12, 3:14*pm, Dan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/20120113_01.html

This looks close. Second hit on my Google phrase search.

On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:25:45 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob


This is actually being reported, Dan. What puzzles me is what the
hell they're using for electricity while this is going on, since
something like 25% of all electricity in Japan comes from nuclear
reactors.

Buy stock in candle manufacturers...

You're an asshole but I feel in the Xmas mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a
plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who
have never heard of you.

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that
crap will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Jan 14, 6:06*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
It's really sad when the only thing you can find to do with your time
is vandalize Usenet News, Not Dan.







Dan wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:25:45 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

This is actually being reported, Dan. *What puzzles me is what the
hell they're using for electricity while this is going on, since
something like 25% of all electricity in Japan comes from nuclear
reactors.

Buy stock in candle manufacturers...

You're an asshole but I feel in the Xmas mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a
plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who
have never heard of you.

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that
crap will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

What have you ever contributed that's not public knowledge and
mainstream status quo?

On Jan 15, 10:31*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 14, 6:06*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
It's really sad when the only thing you can find to do with your time
is vandalize Usenet News, Not Dan.

What have you ever contributed that's not public knowledge and
mainstream status quo?

What have you ever contributed that's not delusional ravings and
fringe nutzoid bleating?

--
"Ordinarilyzfred is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
*only stupid."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine