|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Making or Buying a Equatorial Mount
In message , Chris.B
writes Jonathan Silverlight wrote in message ... My one problem with the Fullerscopes mounts was that the mild steel shafts rusted even when kept dry. How do you get round that? I have the same problem. Even dew makes them rust. I plan to replace them with stainless steel when the right size turns up at work. It is only available in 5 metres lengths and in production order sizes. The effort of increasing the shaft size on the mountings themselves. With all the problems of accurately opening up the holes in the castings, wormwheels, setting circles, weights, clamps, oilite bearings etc is probably just not worth it. So I'm still hoping for some metric stainless stock very close to the original Imperial sizes. Turning down (the very tough) standard 35mm stainless steel (acid resisting) bar accurately to the original 1.25" (31.75mm) in the length required for the MkIV declination shaft would be quite an engineering challenge. My Mark III is long retired - I should get it working again :-) - but I spent a long time looking for stainless steel of the right size. I ended up using aluminium, which was far from ideal but didn't corrode and could be reduced to the right size. I wonder why Fullerscopes didn't use stainless steel. Or plated steel, like my Vixen mount. -- "Forty millions of miles it was from us, more than forty millions of miles of void" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Making or Buying a Equatorial Mount
Jonathan Silverlight wrote in message ...
My Mark III is long retired - I should get it working again :-) - but I spent a long time looking for stainless steel of the right size. I ended up using aluminium, which was far from ideal but didn't corrode and could be reduced to the right size. I wonder why Fullerscopes didn't use stainless steel. Or plated steel, like my Vixen mount. I'm not sure aluminium is as inherently stiff as steel. But it must have lightened the mount quite a bit as the weight is mostly in the steel shafts. Since high rotational speeds are not involved the bearing qualities are probably irrelevant while still well lubricated. The use of stainless steel would have added significantly to the cost of the mountings. Fullerscopes chrome plated their shafts later. Presumably once the rust problem showed up. My Mk111 has chrome plated shafts and still rusted readily where the counter-weights & clamping screws cut through the chrome. I have just removed the shafts from my Mk111 to see how they are held in place. The polar axis is held by a headless, taper-pointed screw. While the declination shaft is held by a simple hammered in pin. I tried to use a stud extractor on both and failed to move them. So drilled out the pin and screw in 1mm larger steps until they came loose. I'll put the sordid images & details on the website to save boring the casual reader. The shafts are 25.35 over most of their length. But 25.45 where they are lightly knurled for better grip in the short length that fits in the castings. Now I really do have to find some stainless steel bar (& quickly too). I don't fancy putting the rusty chromed shafts back in again. I'll probably use industrial Loctite to fix the stainless steel shafts rather than using pins and screws. Chris.B http://mysite.freeserve.com/fullerscopes_mk3 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
motorized equatorial mount tracking | John Aldridge | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | February 17th 04 06:25 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
Equatorial mount for TeleVue NP101 ? | Richard DeLuca | Amateur Astronomy | 21 | December 5th 03 12:50 PM |
Fork Mounts, Equatorial Wedges & Astrophotography? | Jason | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | November 25th 03 10:33 PM |