A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Science Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airplane Scientists



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old December 21st 03, 10:54 PM
Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker (zili@home)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Airplane Scientists

Am Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:15:29 -0800 (PST) schrieb "Rand Simberg":

Different goals, different funding sources, different rules of operation,
etc. I'm not saying that Rutan doesn't have something to offer in the way
of an example. But I think NASA is getting an unfair treatment here and
Rutan is being "canonized" prematurely.


I've no interest in canonizing Burt. In many ways, particularly
regulatorily, he's a pain in the ass.


Maybe he is the PITA that NASA and other government [and/or govt.
'sponsored'] organizations urgently need? Maybe they SHOULD have a
look onto him and his methods - his success proves, they CAN'T be all
false. Maybe...

cu, ZiLi aka HKZL (Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker)
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ /
http://zili.de X No HTML in
/ \ email & news

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.