|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Printing the planets on a 3D printer?
I have been thinking about printing the planets and our moon on a 3D
printer. Does anybody know where I can find the "raw data" to feed the printer? Perhaps it would be best to make every mountain 10 times higher than in the real world on the printout. How would this be done? DK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Printing the planets on a 3D printer?
In article
, Dean Keaton wrote: I have been thinking about printing the planets and our moon on a 3D printer. Does anybody know where I can find the "raw data" to feed the printer? That would depend on how the printer represents objects. But if you have 3-D modelling software to drive it, that can build a spheroid, some basic dimensional data are he http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/planetfact.html Perhaps it would be best to make every mountain 10 times higher than in the real world on the printout. How would this be done? Making relief globes obviously requires a lot more data! If you can convert a coloured or shaded image to a height-map or texture and wrap it around a spheroid (taking into account the map projection represented), I'm sure there are suitable maps of at least the Earth, Mars, and the Moon available (e.g. from the USGS). Radar-survey images of the inner planets could also be similarly treated. (Disclaimer: I have only a passing acquaintance with 3-D applications, and couldn't begin to say how this is actually done with a given program.) You'd definitely have to increase the altitude scale for the relief to be noticeable. On a 1:10^8 model of the Earth (about 13 cm in diameter) even the Hawaiian Islands would stand only about 0.1 mm above the floor of the Pacific. To make any but the most extreme features noticeable you'd probably have to exaggerate them by a factor of at least fifty: for example this would make the Alps or the Rockies about 1 mm higher than the surrounding terrain at that sort of scale. Olympus Mons is said to be the biggest mountain in the solar system, but even so it would be a barely discernable lump on a Mars-globe without considerable exaggeration. How big is the printer, and what is its resolution? If your models are all rendered at the same scale, small enough to make Jupiter a practical size, it's likely that none of the rocky bodies will be large enough to depict much surface detail at all, or even their asphericity (flattening). -- Odysseus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Make a telescope using your printer | Thad Floryan | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | November 3rd 11 08:50 AM |
OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | June 3rd 06 02:05 PM |
printing slides | C. Balci | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | January 10th 05 04:31 AM |
Building a simple rich field telescope? + laser printer | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 14th 03 05:16 PM |