MOON WIDE WEB - the new moon landing hoax website

Paul A. Suhler wrote:

It's true. I read it somewhere.


Just wondering here. Is there a reason for the incredible amount of
cross posting recently ??? (you just did to 4 other groups)


Just wondering.........



AM

There was no lunar landings .. all a hoax.

If you believe that parachutes opened on the splashdown
capsule at mach ten and didn't snap off or completely
incinerate in a flash, I've got prime Ocean front property
in New Mexico for you cheap.

Think about it.

As far as hundreds and hundres of people knowing about the
hoax and not breathing a word, who's to say all those people
were in on it, couldn't a few dozen high up people pulled it off
and all the rest were duped along with everyone else.

ie who knows for sure there was even a person aboard that
huge wingless pencil pointed upwards to nowhere?? Only
a few.

who's to say some that knew didn't say something about it
and all the zombies called him a fraud??

Steve

Steve wrote:
If you believe that parachutes opened on the splashdown
capsule at mach ten and didn't snap off or completely
incinerate in a flash, I've got prime Ocean front property
in New Mexico for you cheap.

So, Steve, you're telling us that the terminal velocity of the capsule
in Earth's atmosphere is Mach 10?

The capsule was moving fast, capiche? So fast in fact that the
outside of the metal capsule would have melted merely from
molecular friction of air molecules is that any clearer to you?
I MEAN FAAAAAST JACK. If you still believe mylar parachutes
could function under those conditions again,

But for the sake of argument, let's say the parachutes opened
and held. Do you undersand the reverse G-Force at the split
second instant the parachutes snapped open??? You'd have
to peel the fricken astro-nots off the front face plate of the
capsule with a putty knife. Use some brain cells on this one
if you can. F=MA (read up on it, it's very easy to learn).

My second point is at least think for yourselves if you can..
I know that's asking a lot, coz the m-asses are as
brainwashed with all kinds of b.s. today as they were a
thousand years ago. But try. Start with opening a physics book.

I'm still taking bids on my ocean front properties in New Mexico.

Steve

Steve wrote:
[a total evasion of the question, coupled with a spectacular ignorance
of the physics involved]

Lets try again, Steve -- and this time you might want to mention whether
you're aware of the ablative heat shield.

Were you suggesting that the terminal velocity of the module upon
re-entry was Mach 10, or not? A yes or no will suffice.

Of course, if you're just trolling, we will expect further obfuscation.

--
Noah

Noah

When did the parachutes open? Answer this one to the world.

I meant that rhetorically coz I know you won't, coz you can't.

But you still have time to take your blinders off and pull your head
out of the sand on digest some simple logic:

If the chutes opened early, they'd completely fail as they need air
to pop open. Ok. Now, if they opened a little later, the heat would
be so intense you couldn't even film the chutes as they vaporized.
It would happen that fast. Ok, finally, if the chutes opened late in
the decent, the speed would be soooo tremendous on the chutes
due to F=MA (did you look what those 3 letters stand for)
force caused by the 2-ton capsule hurling toward the planet faster
and faster that it would completely destroy the chutes to shreds,
mylar or not.

Think about it with half a brain, and you'll find I'm dead right.

But, if you still think parachutes were used to bring men down
from the moon, seriously, I want to sell you my New Mexico properties
cheap as Apollo 13 set props.

The gullibles who believe the splashdown portion of the apollo
movies to be true need serious 101 physics lab rehabilitation to
help them grasp a little bit of reality..

Steve

Noah

When did the parachutes open? Answer this one to the world.


I meant that rhetorically coz I know you won't, coz you can't.


But you still have time to take your blinders off and pull your head
out of the sand and digest simple logic:

If the chutes opened early, they'd completely fail as they need air
to pop open. Ok. Now, if they opened a little later, the heat would
be so intense you couldn't even film the chutes as they vaporized.
It would happen that fast. Ok, finally, if the chutes opened late in
the decent, the speed would be soooo tremendous on the chutes
due to F=MA (did you look what those 3 letters stand for)
force caused by the 2-ton capsule hurling toward the planet faster
and faster that it would completely destroy the chutes to shreds,
mylar or not. Not to mention that heat would continue to build
as the thing fell deeper and deeper through the atmosphere.

Ever wonder why Nasa didn't show footage of chutes opening?
Now you know.

Think about it with half a brain, and you'll find I'm dead right.

But, if you still think parachutes were used to bring men down
from the moon, seriously, I want to sell you my New Mexico properties
cheap as Apollo 13 set props.


The gullibles who believe the splashdown portion of the apollo
movies to be true need serious 101 physics lab rehabilitation to
help them grasp a little bit of reality..


Steve

Noah

When did the parachutes open? Answer this one to the world.


I meant that rhetorically coz I know you won't, coz you can't.


But you still have time to take your blinders off and pull your head
out of the sand and digest simple logic:

If the chutes opened early, they'd completely fail as they need air
to pop open. Ok. Now, if they opened a little later, the heat would
be so intense you couldn't even film the chutes as they vaporized.
It would happen that fast. Ok, finally, if the chutes opened late in
the decent, the speed would be soooo tremendous on the chutes
due to F=MA (did you look what those 3 letters stand for)
force caused by the 2-ton capsule hurling toward the planet faster
and faster that it would completely destroy the chutes to shreds,
mylar or not. Not to mention that heat would continue to build
as the thing fell deeper and deeper through the atmosphere.

Ever wonder why Nasa didn't show footage of chutes opening?
Now you know.

Think about it with half a brain, and you'll find I'm dead right.

But, if you still think parachutes were used to bring men down
from the moon, seriously, I want to sell you my New Mexico properties
cheap as Apollo 13 set props.


The gullibles who believe the splashdown portion of the apollo
movies to be true need serious 101 physics lab rehabilitation to
help them grasp a little bit of reality..


Steve

Noah

When did the parachutes open? Answer this one to the world.


I meant that rhetorically coz I know you won't, coz you can't.


But you still have time to take your blinders off and pull your head
out of the sand on digest some simple logic:


If the chutes opened early, they'd completely fail as they need air
to pop open. Ok. Now, if they opened a little later, the heat would
be so intense you couldn't even film the chutes as they vaporized.
It would happen that fast. Ok, finally, if the chutes opened late in
the descent, the speed would be soooo tremendous on the chutes
due to F=MA (did you look what those 3 letters stood for)
force caused by the 2-ton capsule hurling toward the planet faster
and faster that it would completely destroy the chutes to shreds,
mylar or not.


Think about it with half a brain, and you'll find I'm dead right.


But, if you still think parachutes were used to bring men down
from the moon, seriously, I want to sell you my New Mexico properties
cheap as Apollo 13 set props.


The gullibles who believe the splashdown portion of the apollo
movies to be true need serious 101 physics lab rehabilitation to
help them grasp a little bit of reality..


Steve

Steve wrote:

The gullibles who believe the splashdown portion of the apollo
movies to be true need serious 101 physics lab rehabilitation to
help them grasp a little bit of reality..

Steve



When I was younger, I would have beaten you senseless
to make you see reality.


You really are an idiot. You would think that min,
and brad would have set an example for you NOT to
follow.


{PLONK}




--
AM

http://sctuser.home.comcast.net

CentOS 4.2 KDE 3.3