|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
You have a spacestation in space.
The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote:
You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote: You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket fuel. Well, theoretically. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
On Oct 2, 12:40 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote: On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote: You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket fuel. Well, theoretically. Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating, defining speed. Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right synchrony and balance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
On Oct 2, 12:52 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:40 pm, gb6726 wrote: On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote: On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote: You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket fuel. Well, theoretically. Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating, defining speed. Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right synchrony and balance. Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with speeds at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G and slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean reaching over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central weight to de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation only with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme rotating velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to higher rpm-s, probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's gravity. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
On Oct 2, 12:58 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:52 pm, gb6726 wrote: On Oct 2, 12:40 pm, gb6726 wrote: On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote: On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote: You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket fuel. Well, theoretically. Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating, defining speed. Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right synchrony and balance. Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with speeds at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G and slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean reaching over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central weight to de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation only with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme rotating velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to higher rpm-s, probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's gravity. What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but do back and forth 180. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
You have a spacestation in space.
The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket fuel. Well, theoretically. Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating, defining speed. Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right synchrony and balance. Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with speeds at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G and slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean reaching over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central weight to de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation only with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme rotating velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to higher rpm-s, probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's gravity. What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but do back and forth 180. These are the things Hollywood does so well in slow motion. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
On Oct 2, 1:37 pm, gb6726 wrote:
You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket fuel. Well, theoretically. Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating, defining speed. Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right synchrony and balance. Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with speeds at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G and slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean reaching over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central weight to de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation only with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme rotating velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to higher rpm-s, probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's gravity. What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but do back and forth 180. These are the things Hollywood does so well in slow motion. Seek timing Luke Skywalker. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
On Oct 2, 2:11 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:37 pm, gb6726 wrote: You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Aheim. Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket, a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket to the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180 degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the bottom. What happens dear astronomer? Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket fuel. Well, theoretically. Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating, defining speed. Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right synchrony and balance. Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with speeds at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G and slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean reaching over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central weight to de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation only with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme rotating velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to higher rpm-s, probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's gravity. What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but do back and forth 180. These are the things Hollywood does so well in slow motion. Seek timing Luke Skywalker. "You need a rotor" Yoda balances back into position through rotation after each swing with the heavy weight thrown by Luke Skywalker. Luke yells up: Are we moving? Yoda: Not if you are throwing the swings at the wrong timong. Trust me. Close your eyes and feel the... circumstance. You will know what you will have to do. Luke: If I could have my powers we wouldn't be in this mess.) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-gravity experiment
Dear gb6726:
On Oct 2, 11:30 am, gb6726 wrote: You have a spacestation in space. The idea is to set this weight into motion. Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and thrown to the side. Like an ice skater swinging his / her arms. The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible. No, conservation of momentum says it must be true. This is how rocket motors work too. Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek series. Cannot be reproduced in the lab. Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating. What happened to the "dissolved matter's" momentum? You teleport it to some other place, but what did you do with its momentum? To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get fooled. Telelporation of massive objects does not yet exist. Conservation of momentum seems to still hold. You have nothing new. David A. Smith |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does anti-gravity, as a force, exist? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 11 | December 13th 05 03:06 AM |
Anti-gravity Waves | Asimov | Astronomy Misc | 3 | January 18th 05 08:16 PM |
NASA BPP "anti-gravity saucers" | Peter Harding | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 25th 04 06:38 PM |
Anti-Gravity Propulsion Soon a Reality (according to CNN) | Coppy Littlehouse | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | September 10th 03 07:41 PM |