|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice for moonset photography
This sort of involves astronomy, and I am definately an amateur, so...
If my calculations are correct, on Autust 13th I have the opportunity to photograph the moon setting directly behind Mt. Evans mere minutes before sunrise from Capitol Hill in Denver. I intend to use my Lumix FZ35 with a teleconverter that gives it the equivalent of a 826mm focal length if it were a 35mm, which it isn't. If you are interested, here is a picture I took of *just* the moon using the same setup: http://www.flickr.com/photos/3585314...57623129010923 I somehow calculated exposure time and aperture for that photo, but I have long since forgotten how I did it. Anyway, for my moonset shot, I *could* let the FZ35 figure out everything for itself--it's a pretty smart camera--or I could select certain parameters and let the camera figure out the rest. For example, I was thinking of selecting a "film speed" of 100; would you recommend anything different for an almost daylit moonset shot? I figure I could use up to an eighth of a second exposure and the moon shouldn't have time to move more than one pixel; should I use all the time available, or go faster? -- Please reply to: | "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is pciszek at panix dot com | indistinguishable from malice." Autoreply is disabled | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice for moonset photography
On 2011-07-20, Paul Ciszek wrote:
This sort of involves astronomy, and I am definately an amateur, so... If my calculations are correct, on Autust 13th I have the opportunity to photograph the moon setting directly behind Mt. Evans mere minutes before sunrise from Capitol Hill in Denver. I intend to use my Lumix FZ35 with a teleconverter that gives it the equivalent of a 826mm focal length if it were a 35mm, which it isn't. If you are interested, here is a picture I took of *just* the moon using the same setup: http://www.flickr.com/photos/3585314...57623129010923 I somehow calculated exposure time and aperture for that photo, but I have long since forgotten how I did it. Anyway, for my moonset shot, I *could* let the FZ35 figure out everything for itself--it's a pretty smart camera--or I could select certain parameters and let the camera figure out the rest. For example, I was thinking of selecting a "film speed" of 100; would you recommend anything different for an almost daylit moonset shot? I figure I could use up to an eighth of a second exposure and the moon shouldn't have time to move more than one pixel; should I use all the time available, or go faster? You can use the "sunny f/16" rule for the full moon. At f/16 set the shutter speed to 1/ISO. For othe focal ratios set the shutter accordingly. f/32 uses 4/ISO, f/8 uses 1/(4*ISO). Bracket, bracket, bracket. Bud |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice for moonset photography
On 20 Ιούλ, 16:59, (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
This sort of involves astronomy, and I am definately an amateur, so... If my calculations are correct, on Autust 13th I have the opportunity to photograph the moon setting directly behind Mt. Evans mere minutes before sunrise from Capitol Hill in Denver. *I intend to use my Lumix FZ35 with a teleconverter that gives it the equivalent of a 826mm focal length if it were a 35mm, which it isn't. *If you are interested, here is a picture I took of *just* the moon using the same setup: http://www.flickr.com/photos/3585314.../set-721576231... I somehow calculated exposure time and aperture for that photo, but I have long since forgotten how I did it. *Anyway, for my moonset shot, I *could* let the FZ35 figure out everything for itself--it's a pretty smart camera--or I could select certain parameters and let the camera figure out the rest. *For example, I was thinking of selecting a "film speed" of 100; would you recommend anything different for an almost daylit moonset shot? *I figure I could use up to an eighth of a second exposure and the moon shouldn't have time to move more than one pixel; should I use all the time available, or go faster? -- Please reply to: * * * * * *| "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is pciszek at panix dot com * *| *indistinguishable from malice." Autoreply is disabled * * * | One of the joys about the digital age is the fact we have IMMEDIATE feedback. Why not set the camera in manual mode, ISO 100 so as to have the lowest possible noise and activation of the histogram during preview and start firing away? Start out with 1/500 sec and go from there. This is a very trivial exercise and with immediate feedback at the back of the camera. Anthony. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice for moonset photography
In article , wrote: You can use the "sunny f/16" rule for the full moon. At f/16 set the shutter speed to 1/ISO. For othe focal ratios set the shutter accordingly. f/32 uses 4/ISO, f/8 uses 1/(4*ISO). Bracket, bracket, bracket. I think my DMW-LT55 teleconverter (magnification 1.7) throws a wrench into the Sunny 16 math; I hope I can find someone who understands how that works. Anyway, am I correct in assuming that because I am aiming at a point in the sky almost exactly opposite the sun, a polarizer is pointless? -- "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice for moonset photography
In article ,
Paul Ciszek wrote: In article , wrote: You can use the "sunny f/16" rule for the full moon. At f/16 set the shutter speed to 1/ISO. For othe focal ratios set the shutter accordingly. f/32 uses 4/ISO, f/8 uses 1/(4*ISO). Bracket, bracket, bracket. I think my DMW-LT55 teleconverter (magnification 1.7) throws a wrench into the Sunny 16 math; I hope I can find someone who understands how that works. The teleconverter may mean (depending on how clever it is; if the lens, camera and teleconverter are from the same company and modern, and the teleconverter has electrical contacts, the camera probably does this for you) that the camera is at f/16 when the aperture dial on the lens reads f/9.4 ... obviously the aperture dial doesn't have an f/9.4 stop, so set to f/8, which is really f/13.6, so set at 1/(ISO * (16/13.6)^2) = 1/(ISO * 1.4). But, really, just take shots of the moon the previous night at lots of different aperture and shutter settings, and use the one that gives the prettiest moon for the main event. Anyway, am I correct in assuming that because I am aiming at a point in the sky almost exactly opposite the sun, a polarizer is pointless? Yes Tom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice for moonset photography
In article , Thomas Womack wrote: I think my DMW-LT55 teleconverter (magnification 1.7) throws a wrench into the Sunny 16 math; I hope I can find someone who understands how that works. The teleconverter may mean (depending on how clever it is; if the lens, camera and teleconverter are from the same company and modern, and the teleconverter has electrical contacts, the camera probably does this for you) that the camera is at f/16 when the aperture dial on the lens reads f/9.4 ... obviously the aperture dial doesn't have an f/9.4 stop, so set to f/8, which is really f/13.6, so set at 1/(ISO * (16/13.6)^2) = 1/(ISO * 1.4). The teleconverter is sold by Panasonic, the same company as the camera. It has no electrical contacts, but I have to inform the camera that I am using the teleconverter for things to work properly. Here is a shot I took of the moon at night with the teleconverter at f/6.3, ISO 100, and 1/160 sec: http://www.flickr.com/photos/3585314...in/photostream If anyone is interested, I did a little demo of the increase in resolution provided by the teleconverter, also using the moon: http://www.flickr.com/photos/3585314...n/photostream/ (view full size for best demonstration) -- "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice for moonset photography
In article , wrote: You can use the "sunny f/16" rule for the full moon. At f/16 set the shutter speed to 1/ISO. For othe focal ratios set the shutter accordingly. f/32 uses 4/ISO, f/8 uses 1/(4*ISO). Bracket, bracket, bracket. Can the "sunny 16" rule be generalized as follows? (F-number/16)^2 = ISO*(shutter time) -- Please reply to: | No nation is drunken where wine is cheap. pciszek at panix dot com | --Thomas Jefferson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Determining *direction* of Moonrise and Moonset? | Paul Ciszek | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | February 2nd 10 05:48 AM |
ASTRO: Waiting For Moonset | Preston S Justis | Astro Pictures | 0 | April 26th 07 05:34 PM |
moonrise/moonset time table | Larry | Misc | 1 | December 15th 05 08:45 PM |
Photography advice - Genesis spacecraft | Canopus | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 4th 04 03:54 AM |
Advice please on telescope for photography | Steve Warren @ The UK Speedtrap Guide | UK Astronomy | 15 | September 17th 03 05:36 PM |