|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT GOT RID OF THE FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE
http://www.physorg.com/news111075100.html
"Further, Einstein based his theories on the assumption that the speed of light, c, is constant, and used gedanken ("thought") experiments involving light rays to reach his conclusions. Now Joel Gannett, a Senior Scientist in the Applied Research Area of Telcordia Technologies in Red Bank, New Jersey, has found that Einstein didn't have to do the work the hard way. A researcher in optical networking technologies, Gannett has shown that the Lorentz transformations and velocity addition law can be derived without assuming the constancy of the speed of light, without thought experiments, and without calculus. In this case, Einsteinian relativity could have been discovered several centuries before Einstein." The discovery is breathtaking of course but it seems to me that this Joel Gannett is a plagiarist: the same discovery has already been made by three geniuses: Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond, Tom Roberts and Jong-Ping Hsu: http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/onemorederivation.pdf Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "This is the point of view from wich I intend to criticize the overemphasized role of the speed of light in the foundations of the special relativity, and to propose an approach to these foundations that dispenses with the hypothesis of the invariance of c....We believe that special relativity at the present time stands as a universal theory discribing the structure of a common space-time arena in which all fundamental processes take place....The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity." http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...4dc146100e32c? Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/4114.html Jong-Ping Hsu: "....unexpected affirmative answer to the long-standing question of whether it is possible to construct a relativity theory without postulating the constancy of the speed of light and retaining only the first postulate of special relativity. This question was discussed in the early years following the discovery of special relativity by many physicists, including Ritz, Tolman, Kunz, Comstock and Pauli, all of whom obtained negative answers." Still the plagiarism is not so important in this case. What is important is that Einstein criminal cult finally got rid of Einstein's false light postulate and now Einstein zombie world is going to see a new unimaginable development of Einstein's relativity. Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT GOT RID OF THE FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE
The original discoverer is undoubtedly Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond:
http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/chronogeometrie.pdf Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "D'autre part, nous savons aujourd'hui que l'invariance de la vitesse de la lumiere est une consequence de la nullite de la masse du photon. Mais, empiriquement, cette masse, aussi faible soit son actuelle borne superieure experimentale, ne peut et ne pourra jamais etre consideree avec certitude comme rigoureusement nulle. Il se pourrait meme que de futures mesures mettent en evidence une masse infime, mais non-nulle, du photon ; la lumiere alors n'irait plus a la "vitesse de la lumiere", ou, plus precisement, la vitesse de la lumiere, desormais variable, ne s'identifierait plus a la vitesse limite invariante. Les procedures operationnelles mises en jeu par le "second postulat" deviendraient caduques ipso facto. La theorie elle- meme en serait-elle invalidee? Heureusement, il n'en est rien ; mais, pour s'en assurer, il convient de la refonder sur des bases plus solides, et d'ailleurs plus economiques. En verite, le "premier postulat" suffit, a la condition de l'exploiter a fond." Many years ago, when Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond had already been making money by teaching that Einstein's second (light) postulate is redundant, other discoverers, e.g. Tom Roberts, were still applying for a Government grant in the Ministry of Silly Walks (Einstein Criminal Cult): http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w Tom Roberts, 15 years ago: "Well sir, I have a silly walk and I'd like to obtain a Government grant to help me develop it....I think that with Government backing I could make it very silly." Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT GOT RID OF THE FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE
Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond, Tom Roberts etc. can be called head-in-the-
sand discoverers. They just want to forget about Einstein's false light postulate and enjoy the fact that, even if "light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform", special relativity "would be unaffected". However there is another group of discoverers in Einstein criminal cult who do not always stick their heads in the sand. They have discovered that, since Einstein's false light postulate will have to be abandoned, its negation - the variable speed of light given by Newton's emission theory - will have to be introduced. Of course Einstein's special relativity will remain, by definition, "unaffected": http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i6272.html John Stachel: "Not only is the theory [of relativity] compatible with an emission theory of radiation, since it implies that the velocity of light is always the same relative to its source; the theory also requires that radiation transfer mass between an emitter and an absorber, reinforcing Einstein's light quantum hypothesis that radiation manifests a particulate structure under certain circumstances." http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/...40/pgs/4_5.pdf Jean Eisenstaedt: "Il n'y a alors aucune raison theorique a ce que la vitesse de la lumiere ne depende pas de la vitesse de sa source ainsi que de celle de l'observateur terrestre ; plus clairement encore, il n'y a pas de raison, dans le cadre de la logique des Principia de Newton, pour que la lumiere se comporte autrement - quant a sa trajectoire - qu'une particule materielle. Il n'y a pas non plus de raison pour que la lumiere ne soit pas sensible a la gravitation. Bref, pourquoi ne pas appliquer a la lumiere toute la theorie newtonienne ? C'est en fait ce que font plusieurs astronomes, opticiens, philosophes de la nature a la fin du XVIIIeme siecle. Les resultats sont etonnants... et aujourd'hui nouveaux." Translation from French: "Therefore there is no theoretical reason why the speed of light should not depend on the speed of the source and the speed of the terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly, there is no reason, in the framework of the logic of Newton's Principia, why light should behave, as far as its trajectory is concerned, differently from a material particle. Neither is there any reason why light should not be sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why don't we apply the whole Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is what many astronomers, opticians, philosophers of nature did by the end of 18th century. The results are surprising....and new nowadays." Pentcho Valev |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT GOT RID OF THE FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE
On Oct 9, 2:17 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.physorg.com/news111075100.html "Further, Einstein based his theories on the assumption that the speed of light, c, is constant, and used gedanken ("thought") experiments involving light rays to reach his conclusions. Now Joel Gannett, a Senior Scientist in the Applied Research Area of Telcordia Technologies in Red Bank, New Jersey, has found that Einstein didn't have to do the work the hard way. A researcher in optical networking technologies, Gannett has shown that the Lorentz transformations and velocity addition law can be derived without assuming the constancy of the speed of light, without thought experiments, and without calculus. In this case, Einsteinian relativity could have been discovered several centuries before Einstein." Idiot. Postulates are not the only true statements. Removing its status as a postulate does not make it "false". - Randy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT GOT RID OF THE FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE
On Oct 9, 2:17 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.physorg.com/news111075100.html "Further, Einstein based his theories on the assumption that the speed of light, c, is constant, and used gedanken ("thought") experiments involving light rays to reach his conclusions. Now Joel Gannett, a Senior Scientist in the Applied Research Area of Telcordia Technologies in Red Bank, New Jersey, has found that Einstein didn't have to do the work the hard way. A researcher in optical networking technologies, Gannett has shown that the Lorentz transformations and velocity addition law can be derived without assuming the constancy of the speed of light, without thought experiments, and without calculus. In this case, Einsteinian relativity could have been discovered several centuries before Einstein." The discovery is breathtaking of course but it seems to me that this Joel Gannett is a plagiarist: the same discovery has already been made by three geniuses: Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond, Tom Roberts and Jong-Ping Hsu: http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/onemorederivation.pdf Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "This is the point of view from wich I intend to criticize the overemphasized role of the speed of light in the foundations of the special relativity, and to propose an approach to these foundations that dispenses with the hypothesis of the invariance of c....We believe that special relativity at the present time stands as a universal theory discribing the structure of a common space-time arena in which all fundamental processes take place....The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity." http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...owse_frm/threa... Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/4114.html Jong-Ping Hsu: "....unexpected affirmative answer to the long-standing question of whether it is possible to construct a relativity theory without postulating the constancy of the speed of light and retaining only the first postulate of special relativity. This question was discussed in the early years following the discovery of special relativity by many physicists, including Ritz, Tolman, Kunz, Comstock and Pauli, all of whom obtained negative answers." Still the plagiarism is not so important in this case. What is important is that Einstein criminal cult finally got rid of Einstein's false light postulate and now Einstein zombie world is going to see a new unimaginable development of Einstein's relativity. Pentcho Valev Plagiarism? Did this turkey even bother to look at the paper before hurling accusations? Well I did. Joel Gannett is not a plagiarist. As Gannett correctly points out, the idea that a relativity theory can be constructed without postulating the constancy of the speed of light is an OLD idea, dating from 1910, and is well-documented in the literature. Ignatowsky was probably the first to publish this idea. His 1910 paper pre-dates the three excerpts that PV lists by many years. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IN THE HEADQUARTERS OF EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | August 23rd 07 11:23 AM |
THE MOST BLATANT LIE OF EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 15th 07 03:47 PM |
EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT MAY INTRODUCE AN ALGEBRAIC SPEED OF LIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 11 | June 5th 07 10:07 AM |
SAGNAC AND EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 37 | May 31st 07 11:41 PM |