|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
...House Science Committee Chair calls Nasa a "TRAIN WRECK"!
....House Science Committee Chair calls Nasa a "TRAIN WRECK"!
Trust me, it has gotten far worse than you can possibly imagine. That physically dark, rather nasty and otherwise unavoidably anti- cathode reactive moon of ours is also extensively soft (a touch salty, better than bone dry and loads softer than Earth), and otherwise I very much like what this honest contributor had to say. Androcles: Venus has a brighter albedo than the Moon, clouds reflect better'n dirt and it gets more sunlight per unit area. Venus would be brighter than Earth, too. Venus actually gets more than 4 kw/m2 of peak solar spectrum energy to work with, as well as Venus is also highly reflective of what's also right at the peak sensitivity of that Kodak film. Go figure all that you care, as to how it's even remotely possible to have excluded Venus. Notice how all the damage-control MI/NSA spooks and moles vanish into less than thin air whenever put to any real test. Such as asking those silly rusemasters to put up their 3D simulator clips as proof that their hocus NASA/Apollo missions had no supposed way of their ever including Venus within any unfiltered Kodak FOV(field of view). I have many other Kodak (B&W as well as color) film dynamic range(DR) and color saturation or spectrum sensitive issues with the rather unusual amount of raw UV energy that by rights and of all the known laws of physics should have existed, and of the unavoidable secondary/ recoil affect of such cameras having easily recorded those near-blue photons of what such intense UV/black-light generates. Do we actually need more proof as to how freaking bright the crescent illuminated orb of Venus is, compared to the physically dark and nasty moon itself. (I don't think so) http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061030.html http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...n_eder_big.jpg Remember folks, this was a terrestrial obtained and thus extensively UV filtered shot. Would any of you silly folks like to see lots of other (moon + planet) pictures? Would any of you folks rather talk about those MESSENGER/Earth flyby examples of what's totally skewed into the nearest space toilet. In other words, their mutually perpetrated cold war and subsequent hocus-pocus infomercial spewing jig is up. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
...House Science Committee Chair calls Nasa a "TRAIN WRECK"! | Jonathan | Policy | 9 | May 14th 07 06:21 PM |
...House Science Committee Chair calls Nasa a "TRAIN WRECK"! | Jonathan | History | 11 | May 14th 07 06:21 PM |
Article on supposedly "unprecedented" heights of White House interference at NASA | Jim Oberg | Policy | 69 | February 19th 06 02:10 AM |
Article on supposedly "unprecedented" heights of White House interference at NASA | Eric Chomko | Space Science Misc | 0 | February 15th 06 09:21 AM |
Article on supposedly "unprecedented" heights of White House interference at NASA | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 0 | February 12th 06 05:58 PM |