A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 11th 10, 01:17 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Val Kraut
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 329
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

Step back a minute - so zero G makes some bacteria stronger - so should we
be worried that the ISS astronauts are breeding grounds for stronger
bacteria - which eventually they'll spread amonst the general population.
Time to shut down ISS, quarantine the inhabitants and hope we've escaped
armageddon.


  #22  
Old July 11th 10, 03:44 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Val Kraut
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 329
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden


Having the Salmonella suddenly get stronger in space is like finding
that as vicious as piranha are in the Amazon River, you should see what
happens if you stick them up inside rainclouds...then they can gnaw holes
in steel plate. :-D


But the still scarey part here is we took all sorts precautions - Hornet + 3
Quarantine on Apollo - then oh things gets stronger in zero G on the ISS -
but this is cool science - and there's no roadblock to astronauts who's
resident bacteria have become bacteria on steroids (pun here) from coming
back and attacking the rest of us. Almost makes the ISS seem like an
unintentional time bomb, but never the less a time bomb. Science run amok
for science only is the theme of many of the schlack horror movies - and
here it seems real. Is anybody really minding the store?


  #23  
Old July 11th 10, 04:22 AM posted to sci.space.policy
John Park
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

Pat Flannery ) writes:
On 7/10/2010 4:17 PM, Val Kraut wrote:
Step back a minute - so zero G makes some bacteria stronger - so should we
be worried that the ISS astronauts are breeding grounds for stronger
bacteria - which eventually they'll spread amonst the general population.
Time to shut down ISS, quarantine the inhabitants and hope we've escaped
armageddon.


Zero G is also supposed to make the human immune system weaker, allowing
them to get infected with the strengthened bacteria more easily.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1...tem/index.html
What I'm having trouble with here is why exactly weightlessness would
strengthen bacteria.


Don't forget, in this case, lower g is associated with a bit more ionising
radiation. Could we be talking about simple mutations?

--John Park
  #24  
Old July 11th 10, 06:04 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

On 7/10/2010 4:17 PM, Val Kraut wrote:
Step back a minute - so zero G makes some bacteria stronger - so should we
be worried that the ISS astronauts are breeding grounds for stronger
bacteria - which eventually they'll spread amonst the general population.
Time to shut down ISS, quarantine the inhabitants and hope we've escaped
armageddon.


Zero G is also supposed to make the human immune system weaker, allowing
them to get infected with the strengthened bacteria more easily.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1...tem/index.html
What I'm having trouble with here is why exactly weightlessness would
strengthen bacteria.
Organisms evolve to be optimized for the conditions under which they
live, and having then suddenly get stronger if gravity is taken away
would suggest that they are optimized for life in zero-G, and existence
on Earth and in its gravity field is a non-optimal situation for them.
Astrogenetix states that this is similar to the way some microorganisms
can go into a spore state when their environment is suddenly changed.
That's not a good analogy though, as although some microorganisms that
live in wet conditions can go into a dessicated state when the water
dries up and return to life when exposed to moisture again, they aren't
somehow stronger when they are in that dessicated condition, but rather
in a state of suspended animation.
Having the Salmonella suddenly get stronger in space is like finding
that as vicious as piranha are in the Amazon River, you should see what
happens if you stick them up inside rainclouds...then they can gnaw
holes in steel plate. :-D

Pat
  #25  
Old July 11th 10, 08:00 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

On 7/10/2010 6:44 PM, Val Kraut wrote:

But the still scarey part here is we took all sorts precautions - Hornet + 3
Quarantine on Apollo - then oh things gets stronger in zero G on the ISS -


If you believe what Astrogenetix is saying they do...but Astrogenetix
has a vested economic interest in those organisms mutating into more
virulent forms so they can get more government funds to study them, and
get investors to buy their stock in the hopes of big future profits from
the vaccines they are going to create from their space-mutated organisms.
The profits that could be realized by creating vaccines against
Salmonella and MRSA are almost impossible to estimate...we are probably
talking tens of billions of dollars over the next couple of decades for
any company that could patent such vaccines and sell the rights to their
manufacture to other drug firms.
Which leaves three obvious questions:

1. If that's the case, why aren't more of the major drug companies
sending up medical payloads on the Shuttle or to the ISS? The cost of
the payload would be very small compared to the profits that could be
realized if the concept succeeded.

2. When's the last time you heard of a subsidiary of a company that had
a total of 76 full-time employees coming up with a pair of world-shaking
vaccines?

3. When's the last time you heard of a company that had such a potential
for immense future profits having stock that sells for $1.33 per share?

I suspect that investors have looked at Astrogenetix's claims for its
future vaccines and decided that even the tiny investment it would take
to get a good-sized chunk of stock isn't worth it.

Pat
  #26  
Old July 11th 10, 10:53 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

On 7/10/2010 11:00 PM, Pat Flannery wrote:

If you believe what Astrogenetix is saying they do...but Astrogenetix
has a vested economic interest in those organisms mutating into more
virulent forms so they can get more government funds to study them, and
get investors to buy their stock in the hopes of big future profits from
the vaccines they are going to create from their space-mutated organisms.


Which brings up another good point...Astrogenetix said they should be
doing human tests of their salmonella vaccine in 2010, according to
their statement from September of last year:
http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2009/0...pace-research/
But it's hard to find where exactly they state that _they do have a
experimental vaccine in hand_, and more troubling yet, what exactly
happened regarding any animal testing of said vaccine.
The FDA isn't going to give the go-ahead for human trials of a vaccine
until it's been tried out on animals ranging from white rats to chimps,
to show that it is both safe to use and does indeed do what it's
supposed to do, and that is a process that takes more than a few months
to accomplish.
To get a feel for that process, note this interview with a doctor who is
also working on a (non-space-mutated) salmonella vaccine:
http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2010/0...cine-in-works/
Her group is at the mouse test stage, with no immediate plans to move to
human testing.

Pat

  #27  
Old July 11th 10, 11:06 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

On 7/10/2010 7:22 PM, John Park wrote:
Don't forget, in this case, lower g is associated with a bit more ionising
radiation. Could we be talking about simple mutations?


According to this, salmonella is constantly mutating anyway;
http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2010/0...cine-in-works/
So how can you tell if the space salmonella mutations are due to zero-G,
radiation, or just naturally occurring mutations in the particular
colony of salmonella you took into orbit?
I would expect the salmonella to behave a bit differently under space
growth conditions, the part I have trouble with is it suddenly turning
into some sort of super-bug.
This reminds me of the old Mir Giant Space Worm story, where it sounded
like the space station was infested with the Andromeda Strain:
http://www.anomalist.com/reports/mir.html

Pat
  #28  
Old July 11th 10, 05:36 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

On Jul 7, 3:53*pm, Quadibloc wrote:
On Jul 6, 9:53*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:

As if Michael Steele wasn't bad enough, now another black man is
cuddling up to the enemies of Israel:


That, was, of course, intended in sarcasm.

But I do find the statement bizarre. NASA does have a legitimate role
to promote science education, not only in the United States, but also
elsewhere in the world, because the excitement associated with space
activities provides it with a unique qualification in that area. But
viewing it as a _major_ element of NASA's mission, and specifically
targeted at the Muslim world, is... odd.

There's nothing wrong in admitting that.

John Savard


Being against bad Jews or other bad kinds of bad faith-based folks is
not the same thing as being anti-Semitic.

Sorry to keep confusing those of you that always think our NASA and
it's DARPA have always been so honest and wonderful for humanity or
the environment.

~ BG
  #29  
Old July 11th 10, 05:41 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

On Jul 7, 4:12*pm, "Val Kraut" wrote:
"
But I do find the statement bizarre. NASA does have a legitimate role
to promote science education, not only in the United States, but also
elsewhere in the world, because the excitement associated with space
activities provides it with a unique qualification in that area.

Read the statement carefully - He is to make the muslim nations pround of
the math and science they did centuries ago - he's not there to promote
education in countries that don't value education anymore and actually
deprive women of any education. It' simply Dr. feelgood. What could they
possibly have in mind with this insanity.

Read on - he's to promote American students to study math and engineering -
but he's shutting down NASA and squeezing defense spending - I guess they're
after better educated unemployed.

This whole thing seems like episode 2 of the prisioner.


If there's no spare public loot (only trillions in debt and worse to
come), how the hell are those physics and scientific research grants
plus all of them cushy government jobs with terrific benefits going to
get paid?

~ BG
  #30  
Old July 11th 10, 05:46 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default National Review blows its cork over NASA's Bolden

On Jul 7, 6:56*pm, Brian Thorn wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:28:12 -0800, Pat Flannery
wrote:

It's highly unlikely the ISS will ever repay even a small part of its
development, construction, and resupply costs in any sort of a tangible
economic way at any point in the future.


If the Salmonella vaccine pans out, it might already have.
Salmonellosis kills an estimated 3 million people a year, mostly in
the third world (142,000 were sickened in the US last year and 30
died).

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/0...a-vaccine.html

We have ten years or more of Space Station research ahead of us.
Reports of ISS's failure to earn its keep are greatly exaggerated.

Brian


Not really exaggerated enough. ISS has been nearly a complete waste
of time and resources. After the ISS fat lady sings, then what?

Your ISS "Salmonella Vaccine" ruse is noted.

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bolden to review HLV study on Friday - Sidemount in doubt, In-line/SSME boost Jeff Findley Policy 3 January 19th 10 09:31 PM
NASA's Ares I Rocket Passes Review To Reach Critical Milestone [email protected] Policy 35 April 8th 09 03:29 AM
NASA's Webb Telescope sunshield preliminary design review complete (Forwarded) Andrew Yee[_1_] News 0 March 26th 08 04:05 AM
From the National Review Online... Jim Davis Policy 15 June 23rd 05 07:44 PM
NASA's National Transonic Facility Turns 20 [email protected] News 0 December 5th 03 12:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.