A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Science Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question About media covarage!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 7th 06, 11:36 AM posted to sci.space.moderated
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question About media covarage!

In article ,
Pat Flannery wrote:
Herman Rubin wrote:


I am suggesting that non-profit organizations be allowed to
do this with essentially no government interference. There
are people with money to invest in the future, not in lowering
our population to serfs.




I don't think there is any law against that nowadays; if a number of
people wanted to get together and build a manned orbital rocketship at
their own expense or via public donation, I doubt the government would
have any problem with that, provided that they had a safe place to
launch it from.


There is no explicit law, but there are laws which have
been misinterpreted that way. The government would decide
what is "safe", and they are likely to invoke laws against
dissemination of certain types of information and materiel
(including laptops) to "unfriendly" nations. Other things
have been invoked against space uses by Americans, including
at one time preventing radio amateurs from using foreign
launches for their equipment.

I would be concerned about a fly-by-night organization doing a "The
Producers" routine in this regard though- raising a huge amount of
money, putting it into a design that they know won't work, and then
saying "We tried really hard, but..." and pocketing the majority of the
cash. But proper financial oversight should avoid that problem.


I am not worried about that many people being suckers.



Many men were lost in exploration
projects of all types, with few problems, even if they
were government run. Any frontier has risks.








And payoffs for the risks....if you're lucky, like the search for the
Northwest Passage that never panned out.
But voyages for the sake of pure exploration that received major
government funding weren't all that numerous, and were sometimes done
for reasons of purely political prestige for the sponsoring country,
like the exploration of the poles.
Private voyages of pure exploration were pretty darn rare, and were
limited to fairly low cost operations like climbing Everest.




There are millions of people who believe that much of man's
future lies in space. They are not the poor, but they cannot
do much now without having to get the government's approval
for anything they do. Let them do it as people, not as agents
of the government, and you will see the money available.




I think the new space tourism bill that passed Congress recently
specifically was aimed at making that happen. Burt Rutan privately built
a spacecraft and flew it successfully with minimum government
interference to win the Ansari X Prize; SpaceX is trying to get their
private Falcon 1 to work properly.


I am not at this time interested in space tourism. The
government prizes are not for anything other than suborbital
at this time, and are for snails-pace progress.

If you want to run a private space program via public subscription, more
power to you. Hell, I might kick in $5 or $10 toward such an endeavor
provided that the company doing it was on the up-and-up, and I got some
sort of certificate to hang on my wall.


Will it be approved by the government? There are restrictions
on non-profit organizations, and they are VERY strong.

In fact, at this time, one could not sell stock in a space
company; the SEC would rule it as too speculative. There is
some activity going on in the "entertainment" category, as
this is recognized to be highly speculative.




By selling stock, you just moved from the realm of a non-profit
organization into one being done to make a profit.


I doubt that any of the present governments want to have people
living and working in space. They want people under their control.




You know why? Space pirates, that's why! (cut to image of grizzled
codger with one eye in pressure suit, one-eyed, peg-legged parrot, also
wearing pressure suit, floating from umbilical cord attached to his
shoulder.) ;-)


No; it would provide a place for man not under their control.

And it was done on the cheap- sometimes floating on a log over to the
nearby uninhabited island, or walking over the land bridge into North
America.




Barring a MAJOR breakthrough, this will not happen in space.



Wait around; major breakthroughs happen every few years now.


I know of none, other than the improvement of radio
communications and computers, which have any value
whatever. One of the late Willy Ley's articles pointed
out that the last scientific discovery used in the
German rocket development was made in 1906. Has the
development of tiles really helped space exploration
that much? Right now, the Russians are the only ones
with good capability to supply the space station. The
successor to the Shuttle is still on the drawing boards.

We need a scientific breakthrough, not engineering, and
have we had any recently in physics?

--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558

  #12  
Old May 7th 06, 02:31 PM posted to sci.space.moderated
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question About media covarage!

Herman Rubin wrote:



I don't think there is any law against that nowadays; if a number of
people wanted to get together and build a manned orbital rocketship at
their own expense or via public donation, I doubt the government would
have any problem with that, provided that they had a safe place to
launch it from.



There is no explicit law, but there are laws which have
been misinterpreted that way. The government would decide
what is "safe", and they are likely to invoke laws against
dissemination of certain types of information and materiel
(including laptops) to "unfriendly" nations.

Of course Gerald Bull got in trouble in this regard in relation to Iraq,
but I don't think that the government would have any problem if you
choose a fairly benign nation for a launch site, say something out in
the Micronesian area; in fact, we own several small islands in that area
so you'd still be on U.S. territory, and you'd be close to the equator,
so you'd need less fuel to reach a given orbital altitude due to the
advantage of being able to use the Earth's spin.


Other things
have been invoked against space uses by Americans, including
at one time preventing radio amateurs from using foreign
launches for their equipment.



I would be concerned about a fly-by-night organization doing a "The
Producers" routine in this regard though- raising a huge amount of
money, putting it into a design that they know won't work, and then
saying "We tried really hard, but..." and pocketing the majority of the
cash. But proper financial oversight should avoid that problem.



I am not worried about that many people being suckers.



Oh, I think that has probably happened more than once already, given all
the failed private launch systems that have been developed over the
years, yet never built.
Contact Scott Lowther; he stated that he bought stock in more than one
private launch system that went bust.



I think the new space tourism bill that passed Congress recently
specifically was aimed at making that happen. Burt Rutan privately built
a spacecraft and flew it successfully with minimum government
interference to win the Ansari X Prize; SpaceX is trying to get their
private Falcon 1 to work properly.



I am not at this time interested in space tourism. The
government prizes are not for anything other than suborbital
at this time, and are for snails-pace progress.



Ansari's was a privately, not government funded, prize.
NASA has prizes, but they are for the development of specific
spaceflight technologies more than complete booster/spacecraft systems
(although I do think they recently put out a prize for that also in
regard to a spacecraft to carry crews to the ISS.)



If you want to run a private space program via public subscription, more
power to you. Hell, I might kick in $5 or $10 toward such an endeavor
provided that the company doing it was on the up-and-up, and I got some
sort of certificate to hang on my wall.



Will it be approved by the government? There are restrictions
on non-profit organizations, and they are VERY strong.


Given the present cost of spaceflight, I'm willing to bet that your last
problem will be turning a profit or having your system cost less than
you thought it would. :-D

You know why? Space pirates, that's why! (cut to image of grizzled
codger with one eye in pressure suit, one-eyed, peg-legged parrot, also
wearing pressure suit, floating from umbilical cord attached to his
shoulder.) ;-)



No; it would provide a place for man not under their control.



We aren't heading toward that Libertarian Utopia inside the L5 station
concept again, are we?
That sounds wonderful until you realize that the environment you are in
is so hostile that somebody had better be in control or somebody's going
to do something stupid and kill everyone.
After the communists took power in Russia, they set in place new rules
for the military as a revolt against the strict autocracy of the Czars.
These included giving the sailors far more individual rights of free
choice than they had ever had before, and a guarantee that they would
never have to do jobs that they had not agreed to under their
enlistment. They had a submarine that sank after it began to submerge
with its rear hatch left open by mistake. One of the few survivors of
the sinking explained that he was indeed within a few feet of the open
hatch as the water began flowing in, and could easily have closed it-
but that was not his assigned job and he'd be damned if he was going to
do someone else's job for them, as that was not fair.
If anything big comes about in the line of a non-government funded space
program, it will be done by big business to make a profit...and if you
think governments can be cruel and tyrannical, try on capitalists sometime.
Up there, outside of the control of any Earth government's regulations,
"getting fired" might be a reference to your velocity as you exit the
airlock sans spacesuit.




Wait around; major breakthroughs happen every few years now.



I know of none, other than the improvement of radio
communications and computers, which have any value
whatever. One of the late Willy Ley's articles pointed
out that the last scientific discovery used in the
German rocket development was made in 1906. Has the
development of tiles really helped space exploration
that much? Right now, the Russians are the only ones
with good capability to supply the space station. The
successor to the Shuttle is still on the drawing boards.

We need a scientific breakthrough, not engineering, and
have we had any recently in physics?



Well, we are starting to play around with teleportaion, even if it's
just an atom or two at a time.

Pat

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NOMINATION: digest, volume 2453397 Ross Astronomy Misc 233 October 23rd 05 04:24 AM
VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2005 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 108 May 16th 05 02:55 AM
Deadline approach for NASA return to flight media accreditation Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 April 8th 05 10:01 PM
NASA credentialing media fo possible Shuttle landing at Dryden Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 March 29th 05 04:26 PM
NASA anounces return to flight media accreditation deadline Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 March 28th 05 07:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.