|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the
show "Through the Wormhole. The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
On Jan 24, 9:05*pm, Metspitzer wrote:
I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the show "Through the Wormhole. *The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. Slit shows that particles travel in pairs. They hit the screen separated by that sharp edge,but still in comunication with one another so they will get back in formation almost instantly. Its simple so it must be reality TreBert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
"Metspitzer" wrote in message ... |I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the | show "Through the Wormhole. The show shows a wave pattern on the | screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector | beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through | one slit or another. | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo | | Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the | experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes | the pattern? Because it's hocus pocus. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
On Jan 24, 6:05*pm, Metspitzer wrote:
I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the show "Through the Wormhole. *The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. There's lots of quantum stuff as in in Usenet/newsgroups, but you have to understand that outsiders are not welcome, and all K-12s are systematically banished regardless of their topics or replies. If a standing wave that doesn't actually move can still manage to transfer its energy, then why do photon waves have to individually travel or propagate? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
YOU ARE SIMPLY SENILE, BEERT!
Saul Levy On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:08:57 -0800 (PST), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Slit shows that particles travel in pairs. They hit the screen separated by that sharp edge,but still in comunication with one another so they will get back in formation almost instantly. Its simple so it must be reality TreBert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:05:18 -0500, Metspitzer
wrote: I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the show "Through the Wormhole. The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? They show an illustration of the actual experiment's outcome. And that demonstrates how the outcome of the experiment changes just by putting a detector near the slits. So there must be something about the proximity of the detector, something about the detector itself, perhaps, that causes the wave pattern to change to the particle pattern. My own personal guess, since magnetic force and electronic force have both been ruled out, and since we still know very little about fields of gravitation, my guess is that the detector possesses a tiny gravitational field that forces the particle back into particle mode and out of wave mode. BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. This is it! -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Fiction is required to stick to what's possible. Truth isn't." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:39:53 -0500, Painius
wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:05:18 -0500, Metspitzer wrote: I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the show "Through the Wormhole. The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? They show an illustration of the actual experiment's outcome. And that demonstrates how the outcome of the experiment changes just by putting a detector near the slits. So there must be something about the proximity of the detector, something about the detector itself, perhaps, that causes the wave pattern to change to the particle pattern. My own personal guess, since magnetic force and electronic force have both been ruled out, and since we still know very little about fields of gravitation, my guess is that the detector possesses a tiny gravitational field that forces the particle back into particle mode and out of wave mode. BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. This is it! What would happen if they were to place an identical detector at an identical location relative to each slit. Which detector would shoo the fly away and make it go through the other slit? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
On Jan 25, 10:48*am, Antares 531 wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:39:53 -0500, Painius wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:05:18 -0500, Metspitzer wrote: I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the show "Through the Wormhole. *The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? They show an illustration of the actual experiment's outcome. *And that demonstrates how the outcome of the experiment changes just by putting a detector near the slits. So there must be something about the proximity of the detector, something about the detector itself, perhaps, that causes the wave pattern to change to the particle pattern. *My own personal guess, since magnetic force and electronic force have both been ruled out, and since we still know very little about fields of gravitation, my guess is that the detector possesses a tiny gravitational field that forces the particle back into particle mode and out of wave mode. BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. This is it! What would happen if they were to place an identical detector at an identical location relative to each slit. Which detector would shoo the fly away and make it go through the other slit? You are assuming that individual photons individually move, so right there it gets somewhat problematic. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:11:12 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth
wrote: On Jan 25, 10:48*am, Antares 531 wrote: On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:39:53 -0500, Painius wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:05:18 -0500, Metspitzer wrote: I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the show "Through the Wormhole. *The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? They show an illustration of the actual experiment's outcome. *And that demonstrates how the outcome of the experiment changes just by putting a detector near the slits. So there must be something about the proximity of the detector, something about the detector itself, perhaps, that causes the wave pattern to change to the particle pattern. *My own personal guess, since magnetic force and electronic force have both been ruled out, and since we still know very little about fields of gravitation, my guess is that the detector possesses a tiny gravitational field that forces the particle back into particle mode and out of wave mode. BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. This is it! What would happen if they were to place an identical detector at an identical location relative to each slit. Which detector would shoo the fly away and make it go through the other slit? You are assuming that individual photons individually move, so right there it gets somewhat problematic. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” My thinking is that photons aren't in the form of a discrete little entity of condensed energy, but, are a somewhat smeared out smudge of energy made up of fields such as gravity, electromagnetic, and some other fields that we haven't yet figured out. If this smudge of energy approaches a slit, the path it will take through the slit will be determined by the way those smudged out fields interact with the slit and any other material that may be in the region. This could be many things...but, we don't know what those things are. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Through the Wormhole : Double-slit experiment
On Jan 25, 11:55*am, Antares 531 wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:11:12 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 25, 10:48*am, Antares 531 wrote: On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:39:53 -0500, Painius wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:05:18 -0500, Metspitzer wrote: I was watching another explanation of Wave-particle duality on the show "Through the Wormhole. *The show shows a wave pattern on the screen then they show a crude drawing of someone putting a detector beside the slits and just doing that causes the photons to go through one slit or another. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwO2N7cr7Yo Why don't they show the actual experiment that demonstrates how the experiment changes just by putting a detector beside the slits changes the pattern? They show an illustration of the actual experiment's outcome. *And that demonstrates how the outcome of the experiment changes just by putting a detector near the slits. So there must be something about the proximity of the detector, something about the detector itself, perhaps, that causes the wave pattern to change to the particle pattern. *My own personal guess, since magnetic force and electronic force have both been ruled out, and since we still know very little about fields of gravitation, my guess is that the detector possesses a tiny gravitational field that forces the particle back into particle mode and out of wave mode. BTW there seems to be no active quantum Usenet group. This is it! What would happen if they were to place an identical detector at an identical location relative to each slit. Which detector would shoo the fly away and make it go through the other slit? You are assuming that individual photons individually move, so right there it gets somewhat problematic. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” My thinking is that photons aren't in the form of a discrete little entity of condensed energy, but, are a somewhat smeared out smudge of energy made up of fields such as gravity, electromagnetic, and some other fields that we haven't yet figured out. If this smudge of energy approaches a slit, the path it will take through the slit will be determined by the way those smudged out fields interact with the slit and any other material that may be in the region. This could be many things...but, we don't know what those things are. Exactly, but it's fun to speculate and try to make sense of how the known universe came to be, and how it is affected by its composition that happens to include us humans that seems to have developed a LLPOF disposition because that's so much easier than dealing with the whole truth and nothing but the truth. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
#8 experiment to show that the galaxies are a Double Slit | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | May 7th 08 06:01 PM |
DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 8th 07 01:50 PM |
Toward understanding the Double Slit Experiment, pt. 1 | greysky | Misc | 91 | September 16th 06 01:42 PM |
Toward understanding the Double Slit Experiment, pt. 1 | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | August 10th 06 12:44 PM |
The two slit experiment. | Zdenek Jizba | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 17th 04 04:47 AM |