#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:49 -0500, Patty Brooks
wrote: snip Is Hoagland a fraud? Yes he is. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
In sci.space.policy * wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:49 -0500, Patty Brooks wrote: snip Is Hoagland a fraud? Yes he is. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. What secret discoveries? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
In article ,
* wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:49 -0500, Patty Brooks wrote: snip Is Hoagland a fraud? Yes he is. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. Is your name Maxson? You seem to share their patriarch's Lockheed fetish. To all amused lurkers, I suggest a quick google search on "Formosa's Law" . . . -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. Reformed Aerospace Engineer Columbia Loss FAQ: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:56:02 GMT, Ian Stirling
wrote: In sci.space.policy * wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:49 -0500, Patty Brooks wrote: snip Is Hoagland a fraud? Yes he is. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. What secret discoveries? 1) Ruins of a previous sophisticated and technologically advanced civilization on Mars. This extinct Martian civilization shows evidence of being more technologically advanced than current earth. 2) Evidence of a sudden, catastrophic mass extinction of that civilization on Mars. 3). A breathable atmosphere on Mars. 4). Vegetation on Mars. 5). Grey aliens currently have established a base of Mars. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:58:07 -0600, Herb Schaltegger
wrote: In article , * wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:49 -0500, Patty Brooks wrote: snip Is Hoagland a fraud? Yes he is. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. Is your name Maxson? You seem to share their patriarch's Lockheed fetish. To all amused lurkers, I suggest a quick google search on "Formosa's Law" . . . I suggest you bone up on Lockheed and their holdings and involvement with NASA, the NSA, the phone company, the welfare system, and all the components of Lockheed which are the technology behind the so-called US government. Lockheed is so ingratiated into government, that for all intents and purposes Lockheed IS the US government, and in fact the work force of the new world order. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:13:31 GMT, * wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:58:07 -0600, Herb Schaltegger wrote: In article , * wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:49 -0500, Patty Brooks wrote: snip Is Hoagland a fraud? Yes he is. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. Is your name Maxson? You seem to share their patriarch's Lockheed fetish. To all amused lurkers, I suggest a quick google search on "Formosa's Law" . . . I suggest you bone up on Lockheed and their holdings and involvement with NASA, the NSA, the phone company, the welfare system, and all the components of Lockheed which are the technology behind the so-called US government. Lockheed is so ingratiated into government, that for all intents and purposes Lockheed IS the US government, and in fact the work force of the new world order. Who owns Lockheed? The banks which control the money on this planet: Barclays Bank Plc Janus Capital Management, LLC Putnam Investment Management, LLC Waddell & Reed Financial Inc. United States Trust Company of New York State Street Corporation FMR Corporation (Fidelity Management & Research Corp) Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) Bank of America Corporation Capital Research and Management Company |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:59:14 GMT, Ian Stirling
wrote: In sci.space.history * wrote: On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:56:02 GMT, Ian Stirling wrote: In sci.space.policy * wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:49 -0500, Patty Brooks wrote: snip Is Hoagland a fraud? Yes he is. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. What secret discoveries? 1) Ruins of a previous sophisticated and technologically advanced civilization on Mars. This extinct Martian civilization shows evidence of being more technologically advanced than current earth. 2) Evidence of a sudden, catastrophic mass extinction of that civilization on Mars. 3). A breathable atmosphere on Mars. 4). Vegetation on Mars. 5). Grey aliens currently have established a base of Mars. I think you will find they prefer the term "neutrally pigmented". Hey anything to keep the thread in the public eye. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
Note followups.
In article , * wrote: Hey anything to keep the thread in the public eye. Actually, no. "Anything" is, in fact, grossly off topic in sci.space.policy and sci.space.history . You are posting out of Earthlink, as far as I can tell, and you are thus in violation of Earthlink's net abuse policies. What you feel like doing in alt.alien.visitors is up to you and that group's policies. You have exceeded your welcome in the sci.space.* groups. Please cease and desist off topic crossposts. -george william herbert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hoagland a fraud?
"*" wrote in message ... On 16 Mar 2004 14:35:23 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: Note followups. In article , * wrote: Hey anything to keep the thread in the public eye. Actually, no. "Anything" is, in fact, grossly off topic in sci.space.policy and sci.space.history . But why is the below off topic? Because these are SCIENCE. Support your claims. Show us the proof, not the rumors. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|