Simple Refutation of Steven Carlip's "Does Gravity Travel at theSpeed of Light?"

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 10:01:59 AM UTC-7, Anonymous wrote:
In article
Louis Savain wrote:

Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? by Steven Carlip
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...rav_speed.html

Steven Carlip argues that GR provides a local way for bodies to more or less extrapolate the actual position of a distant gravitational body even though changes in gravity travel at c. ....

Talk is cheap. Show us the math you have to back up what you say.

It's a simple logical refutation. I'm sorry that I cannot make it any simpler.

On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 7:34:03 AM UTC-7, Anonymous wrote:
In article
Louis Savain wrote:

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 10:01:59 AM UTC-7, Anonymous wrote:
In article
Louis Savain wrote:

Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? by Steven Carlip
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...rav_speed.html

Steven Carlip argues that GR provides a local way for bodies to more or less extrapolate the actual position of a distant gravitational body even though changes in gravity travel at c. ....

Talk is cheap. Show us the math you have to back up what you say.

It's a simple logical refutation.

No it's not. It's the blathering of a crank. If you can't do the
math you can't understand the ideas. If you can't understand the
ideas you can't really dispute them.

What you say is at odds with observed reality. You're not offering
a refutation, you're displaying your own ignorance and unfortunate
mental state.

I'm sorry that I cannot make it any simpler.

It's simple enough already, you have no idea what you're talking
about.

In that case, go pack sand up your ass and see if I care.

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...