|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
On Dec 28, 6:51*am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote: "Quadibloc" *wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 5:18 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. But then you're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Special Relativity as given to us by Einstein. I would prefer to think that like Oriel, you have good intentions - but are sadly mistaken about physics. John Savard ================================================== == I'd prefer you to think, too, but I have little hope of you being capable of a task of such enormous magnitude. You may be polite, but you are a fool and a bigot. Unlike Kelleher I focus in on each of Einstein's blunders, without obfuscation, and I am willing to discuss any point you raise, but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. That's not science, that's religion. You're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Galilean Physics as given to us by the Holy Prophets Kepler, Newton, Doppler, Faraday and Michelson. Why am I evil for pointing out Einstein's mathematical blunders? -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You pair go enjoy yourselves as you are both part of the same rubbish created by Isaac who made something of a fuss over the Equation of Time as absolute/relative time while pointing vaguely in the direction of the Ra/Dec framework as a means to model solar system dynamics - "Absolute time, in astronomy, is distinguished from relative, by the equation or correlation of the vulgar time. For the natural days are truly unequal, though they are commonly considered as equal and used for a measure of time; astronomers correct this inequality for their more accurate deducing of the celestial motions " Newton The Equation of Time converts natural noon into 24 hour noon or smooths out the variations in the length of each natural noon cycle to an average and there are 1461 natural noon cycles for 4 orbital circuits.I don't see relativists and non relativists,you are simply all homocentrists in subscribing to Newton's clockwork solar system - at least Newton was interesting in his foolishness as an astronomer can easily trace what he was trying to do whereas his followers merely fling assertions without end. Get used to each other because you are being bypassed by the new crowd who have less an interest in astronomy than you and the other nuisance does.You cannot expect a response again as you can't hold a conversation to the main points and if you are roped in by a sci-fi addict then good for you and enjoy yourself. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
"oriel36" wrote in message
... On Dec 28, 6:51 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "Quadibloc" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 5:18 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. But then you're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Special Relativity as given to us by Einstein. I would prefer to think that like Oriel, you have good intentions - but are sadly mistaken about physics. John Savard ================================================== == I'd prefer you to think, too, but I have little hope of you being capable of a task of such enormous magnitude. You may be polite, but you are a fool and a bigot. Unlike Kelleher I focus in on each of Einstein's blunders, without obfuscation, and I am willing to discuss any point you raise, but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. That's not science, that's religion. You're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Galilean Physics as given to us by the Holy Prophets Kepler, Newton, Doppler, Faraday and Michelson. Why am I evil for pointing out Einstein's mathematical blunders? -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You pair go enjoy yourselves ============================ You go **** off and die, you evil lying thug. -- “I can get all the **** I want.” – The actor Jack Nicholson in “The Departed”. XXX–rated DO NOT WATCH! Your delicate sensibilities may be offended. -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
On Dec 28, 7:11*am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message ... On Dec 28, 6:51 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "Quadibloc" *wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 5:18 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. But then you're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Special Relativity as given to us by Einstein. I would prefer to think that like Oriel, you have good intentions - but are sadly mistaken about physics. John Savard ================================================== == I'd prefer you to think, too, but I have little hope of you being capable of a task of such enormous magnitude. You may be polite, but you are a fool and a bigot. Unlike Kelleher I focus in on each of Einstein's blunders, without obfuscation, and I am willing to discuss any point you raise, but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. That's not science, that's religion. You're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Galilean Physics as given to us by the Holy Prophets Kepler, Newton, Doppler, Faraday and Michelson. Why am I evil for pointing out Einstein's mathematical blunders? -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You pair go enjoy yourselves ============================ You go **** off and die, you evil lying thug. You had Harrison's words in front of you and still can't make sense of the Lat/Long system in tandem with the 24 hour AM/PM system no more than the new bunch who have invented a different story to the old 'solar vs sidereal' nonsense. You are fine,you are not even a traitor to your country- just another meaningless empirical drone living off voodoo yet that is about to change. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
"oriel36" wrote in message
... On Dec 28, 7:11 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" wrote in message ... On Dec 28, 6:51 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "Quadibloc" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 5:18 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. But then you're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Special Relativity as given to us by Einstein. I would prefer to think that like Oriel, you have good intentions - but are sadly mistaken about physics. John Savard ================================================== == I'd prefer you to think, too, but I have little hope of you being capable of a task of such enormous magnitude. You may be polite, but you are a fool and a bigot. Unlike Kelleher I focus in on each of Einstein's blunders, without obfuscation, and I am willing to discuss any point you raise, but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. That's not science, that's religion. You're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Galilean Physics as given to us by the Holy Prophets Kepler, Newton, Doppler, Faraday and Michelson. Why am I evil for pointing out Einstein's mathematical blunders? -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You pair go enjoy yourselves ============================ You go **** off and die, you evil lying thug. You had Harrison's words in front of you ======================================= I've never read anything by Harrison so you can **** off and die, you EVIL LYING thug. -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
On Dec 28, 6:58*am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message ... On Dec 28, 12:18 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message .... On Dec 27, 8:26 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message .... On Dec 27, 5:30 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 4:23 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 12:51 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message ... This not invite responses from thugs and science fiction fans,it is a highly technical topic that is within the vernacular of the interested adult and it represent the single most important topic in science as engineers try to justify the abolition of an already unjustifiable 'leap second' and the right ascension reasoning from which it emerged. Most here have staked their reputations on promoting the 'solar vs sidereal' nonsense ================================================== == You need not worry about staking YOUR reputation, thug. "Most here" (everybody) knows your reputation is one of a crank. Nobody "promotes" the simple fact of sidereal time understood by everybody except you, facts do not need promoting. Trying to play a Usenet thug among your own in sci.relativity might work there but this is saa ================================================== ===== "Most here" (everybody) knows your reputation is one of a lunatic.. Nobody here (saa) is fooled by you calling a simple fact "junk", lunatic, many here (saa) *have clock driven telescope mounts that are not junk, they operate on sidereal time and turn the telescope 361 degrees in 24 hours because the Earth turns 361 degrees in 24 hours, which they understand and you don't. The *now bypassed 'solar vs sidereal' nonsense ============================================= "Most here" (everybody) knows your reputation is one of spewing nonsense. Nobody here (saa) is fooled by you calling a simple fact "nonsense", lunatic, many here (saa) *have clock driven telescope mounts that are not nonsense, they operate on sidereal time and turn the telescope 361 degrees in 24 hours because the Earth turns 361 degrees in 24 hours, which they understand and you don't. Most ignore you completely. I should too, but as you are a bullying thug I'll go toe to toe with you and slap you hard. You need not worry about staking YOUR reputation, vicious nonsensical thug. -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You are fine =========================== Yes, I am, but YOU are a moronic thug with the well-deserved reputation of an idiot. Many here (saa) *have clock driven telescope mounts that operate on sidereal time and turn the telescope 361 degrees in 24 hours because the Earth turns 361 degrees in 24 hours. Their clock driven telescopes turn about their own homocentric axis which require no meridian lines to set up and do not imitate the Lat/ Long system which contains the information of latitudinal rotational speeds for each location North or South of the maximum equatorial speed.They turn at their own clockwork speed based on the average 24 hour day within the confines of the 365 day/366 day system which diverges from the natural system of 365 1/4 rotations per annual circuit. None of you believe in good nor evil, ================================================== = Amateur clock driven telescope mounts turn the telescope at a rate of 361 degrees in 24 hours, 15.042 degrees/hour, 15.042 arc minutes/minute, 15.042 arc seconds/second, *366.256 sidereal days per year to a precision of 3 decimal places, without any irrelevant latitude or longitude information needed by the clock drive. You just read John Harrison ================ You are an evil LIAR, I did no such thing. The satellite community got so fed up dealing with these leap second aberrations that they decided to rewrite the technical and historical story to suit rotation once in 24 hours but attached new falsehoods in the process.They don't even bother to deal with the empiricist astronomer who is now stuck with 'solar vs sidereal' junk that is already being bypassed. So here we have the new bunch of empirical drones surmising a perfect 24 hour rotation in 1820 and diverging by microseconds ever since in an effort to support the ultra accuracy of clocks rather than deal with the proper principles which demonstrate they are being silly. It is not 1820 but the year nineteen ninety four I am thinking of in terms of the ability to doctor history to suit whatever agenda is required by the empirical community and if that means turning 'solar vs sidereal' into a myth that never happened then it has come to pass.What horrified the few great people who recognized the dangers of varying hypothesis without any sense of responsibility is a tenet of the vicious strain of empiricism that has diminished the great astronomical and terrestrial sciences for so long - "Nazi theory indeed specifically denies that such a thing as "the truth" exists. [] The implied objective of this line of thought is a nightmare world in which the Leader, or some ruling clique, controls not only the future but the past. If the Leader says of such and such an event, "It never happened"well, it never happened. If he says that two and two are fivewell, two and two are five. This prospect frightens me much more than bombs []" Orwell This is being seen right now,the 'solar vs sidereal' nonsense is no longer convenient so they invent a new system of thought that requires them to distance planetary dynamics from timekeeping altogether - this is not just fiction on an industrial scale,it is also fraud of the worst kind. Evil sometimes bears the face of respectability and contrived language so let each be their own judge of themselves and where they stand because there is nowhere to hide. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
On Dec 28, 8:19*am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message ... On Dec 28, 7:11 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message .... On Dec 28, 6:51 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "Quadibloc" *wrote in message .... On Dec 27, 5:18 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. But then you're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Special Relativity as given to us by Einstein. I would prefer to think that like Oriel, you have good intentions - but are sadly mistaken about physics. John Savard ================================================== == I'd prefer you to think, too, but I have little hope of you being capable of a task of such enormous magnitude. You may be polite, but you are a fool and a bigot. Unlike Kelleher I focus in on each of Einstein's blunders, without obfuscation, and I am willing to discuss any point you raise, but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. That's not science, that's religion. You're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Galilean Physics as given to us by the Holy Prophets Kepler, Newton, Doppler, Faraday and Michelson. Why am I evil for pointing out Einstein's mathematical blunders? -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You pair go enjoy yourselves ============================ You go **** off and die, you evil lying thug. You had Harrison's words in front of you ======================================= I've never read anything by Harrison so you can **** off and die, you EVIL LYING thug. It is always in the nature of those who hate to turn their faces away from what is good and right and that is why you didn't read Harrison's explanation of the principles behind his engineering marvel and the hand sweeping across the face of a clock or watch contains an enormous amount of information about the great planetary cycles and human involvement in them. Two years and counting to turn away from a loathsome situation and turn towards a streamlined view of the matter where leap seconds are abolished for the right reasons otherwise it is fraud and science fiction.All the hatred you display in sci.relativity doesn't work here insofar as there is no distinction between homocentrists following the rotating celestial sphere diorama of Newton/Flamsteed.Get used to seeing those two names together. -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
"oriel36" wrote in message
... On Dec 28, 8:19 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" wrote in message ... On Dec 28, 7:11 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" wrote in message .... On Dec 28, 6:51 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "Quadibloc" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 5:18 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. But then you're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Special Relativity as given to us by Einstein. I would prefer to think that like Oriel, you have good intentions - but are sadly mistaken about physics. John Savard ================================================== == I'd prefer you to think, too, but I have little hope of you being capable of a task of such enormous magnitude. You may be polite, but you are a fool and a bigot. Unlike Kelleher I focus in on each of Einstein's blunders, without obfuscation, and I am willing to discuss any point you raise, but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. That's not science, that's religion. You're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Galilean Physics as given to us by the Holy Prophets Kepler, Newton, Doppler, Faraday and Michelson. Why am I evil for pointing out Einstein's mathematical blunders? -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You pair go enjoy yourselves ============================ You go **** off and die, you evil lying thug. You had Harrison's words in front of you ======================================= I've never read anything by Harrison so you can **** off and die, you EVIL LYING thug. It is always in the nature of those who hate to turn their faces away from what is good and right ================================================== ====== It is always the nature of an evil arsehole like you to lie. Amateur clock driven telescope mounts turn the telescope at a rate of 361 degrees in 24 hours, 15.042 degrees/hour, 15.042 arc minutes/minute, 15.042 arc seconds/second, 366.256 sidereal days per year to a precision of 3 decimal places, without any irrelevant latitude or longitude information needed by the clock drive. Professionals use a higher precision, taking into account 366.256 days (one year) in 360 degrees or 1.0737 degrees per day. Any amateur who lurked on this thread and taking a long exposure timed photograph (which could last several hours) of the stars with a home-made telescope and clock drive would get a blurred image if they were talked into wasting their time and money using a 15 degrees/hour clock drive recommended by that evil bullying thug Kelleher. I believe in good and evil. I am a good and truthful engineer even if I swear at evil lying thugs who deliberately attempt to mislead amateur astronomers. Fortunately there are enough of us to let any novice know you are completely crazy. Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. **** off and die, you EVIL LYING thug. -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
On Dec 28, 9:18*am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message ... On Dec 28, 8:19 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message .... On Dec 28, 7:11 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" *wrote in message .... On Dec 28, 6:51 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "Quadibloc" *wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 5:18 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. But then you're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Special Relativity as given to us by Einstein. I would prefer to think that like Oriel, you have good intentions - but are sadly mistaken about physics. John Savard ================================================== == I'd prefer you to think, too, but I have little hope of you being capable of a task of such enormous magnitude. You may be polite, but you are a fool and a bigot. Unlike Kelleher I focus in on each of Einstein's blunders, without obfuscation, and I am willing to discuss any point you raise, but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. That's not science, that's religion. You're evil too, because you try to lead people away from the truth of Galilean Physics as given to us by the Holy Prophets Kepler, Newton, Doppler, Faraday and Michelson. Why am I evil for pointing out Einstein's mathematical blunders? -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When I get my O.B.E. I'll be an earlobe. You pair go enjoy yourselves ============================ You go **** off and die, you evil lying thug. You had Harrison's words in front of you ======================================= I've never read anything by Harrison so you can **** off and die, you EVIL LYING thug. It is always in the nature of those who hate to turn their faces away from what is good and right ================================================== ====== It is always the nature of an evil arsehole like you to lie. Amateur clock driven telescope mounts turn the telescope at a rate of 361 degrees in 24 hours, 15.042 degrees/hour, 15.042 arc minutes/minute, 15.042 arc seconds/second, *366.256 sidereal days per year to a precision of 3 decimal places, without any irrelevant latitude or longitude information needed by the clock drive. The Lat/Long system is tied to the 24 hour AM/PM cycle as latitudinal speeds decrease away from the equator and consistent with a round and rotating Earth.The next time mathematicians decide to lunge at a conclusion based on a rotating celestial sphere and a watch,let them first understand where the 24 hour AM/PM cycle comes from within the confines of the 1461 day cycle. Professionals use a higher precision, taking into account 366.256 days (one year) in 360 degrees or 1.0737 degrees per day. You should go back to sci.relativity where you make a wonderful lord,in fact,you should call yourself a mathematical emperor but then again,who else has shown themselves to be any better or worse than you are.. Any amateur who lurked on this thread and taking a long exposure timed photograph (which could last several hours) of the stars with a home-made telescope and clock drive would get a blurred image if they were talked into wasting their time and money using a 15 degrees/hour clock drive recommended by that evil bullying thug Kelleher. The recommendation comes from the astronomical authorities where parts of this system have their roots in antiquity along with the references used.The recommendation by Harrison himself should be enough given the opposition by empirical drones to his innovation.I have noticed that empiricists will read nothing and it is this dystopian society which now wishes to create a 'new' version where rotation takes place in 24 hours in 1820 thereby bypassing the 'solar vs sidereal' junk favored by most here. I believe in good and evil. I am a good and truthful engineer even if I swear at evil lying thugs who deliberately attempt to mislead amateur astronomers. Fortunately there are enough of us to let any novice know you are completely crazy. Unlike hypocritical Quadiblockhead who wants to be polite, I tell you the truth as it really is. YOU ARE EVIL. **** off and die, you EVIL LYING thug. Go on ,let it out as that is ultimately what the other empiricists feel and you do them proud but being a Usenet warrior is fine so long as you are behind a keyboard thousands of miles away hence all the bluster counts for nothing.You don't like being called a thug but your actions are that of one and you do serve the purpose of drawing people here into your circle using the now rejected 'solar vs sidereal' conception. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
On Dec 27, 11:51*pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote: but you refuse to listen and trust Einstein because the other sheep do. I took relativity in my second year; I _understand_ it, and know it to be true. Those who can, and will, may follow me and know it as men and not as sheep. The truths of science are open to all. John Savard |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Leap second proposal
On Dec 28, 12:07*am, oriel36 wrote:
I don't see relativists and non relativists,you are simply all homocentrists in subscribing to Newton's clockwork solar system - Clockwork time is needed for mechanics, for electronics, and for chemistry. Applied to astronomy, it let us find Neptune, refuting your line of argument for all time - it appears. John Savard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The leap day | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 29 | August 21st 15 09:54 PM |
To Leap or Not to Leap: Scientists debate a timely issue | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | April 24th 06 08:42 AM |
LEAP YEAR, LEAP SECOND 31.12.2005, CALENDAR.=====.. | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | December 29th 05 03:14 AM |
Leap Seconds | Eric Chomko | Policy | 2 | July 15th 04 11:19 PM |
Concerning the leap day | Oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 29th 04 09:31 PM |