|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
"Stuf4" wrote in message om... You stated that AS-204 was not under military command or control. And then you follow that up by acknowledging the fact that the flight crew was military (I would note that it was not only "several", but *all*). My point was that a military crew operating a vehicle *is* military command and control. Gus was the military commander over his military crew. Not necessarily if they are operating that vehicle for a civilian agency. They were military officers working for a civilian agency and following that agencies rules. Now back to the real world... A subtle example of a military crew exerting military command and control: Gus: Hey Ed, pass me that flashlight. Ed: Here you go, Gus. What if Ed asked Gus for the flashlight? Would that be an example of insubordination? |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug..." wrote in message ... In article , says... "Ami Silberman" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... Hey, folks--I wasn't sure where to post this one because there's been so much blathering, but how about this for a question: You do realize the first three groups of astronauts were recruited from within the military, and by that I mean they received orders to show up at such-and-so place at such-and-so time with absolutely no clue why they were there? I thought that they had to apply first, and then the candidates received the orders. Shhhh! It's LaToya's fantasy. Which, once again, displays her lack of real knowledge about the American space program of the 1950s and 1960s. The very first astronaut selection was, indeed, a "blind" call worked through the military chain of command. Each service was asked to select a certain number of candidates, who met in a room and were told exactly what the program was about. (They were even told that they did not *have* to volunteer, if they didn't want to.) They weren't told the subject of the meeting until they arrived. However, beginning with the second astronaut class, NASA issued requests for application, listing the requirements and asking for applications from individuals, both military and civilian. There weren't all that many civilians who were qualified for the second group, since test pilot experience was still mandatory. But beginning with the third group, test pilot experience was simply "preferred," and several non-test pilots applied (and several were accepted). Beginning with the second group, your entry into the selection process began with your individual application -- if you were active military, your chain of command found out about it if/when you were asked to come interview with Deke & Co. Actually, LaDonna is probably conflating the first two or three (can't remember how many there where, I think three, but the third wasn't actually called in) "batches" of test pilots called for project Mercury (Astronaut Group I), which was a blind call (although the second and third "batch" heard what was going on through the grapevine), and the actual numbered Astronaut Groups II and III. |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Doug... wrote:
However, beginning with the second astronaut class, NASA issued requests for application, listing the requirements and asking for applications from individuals, both military and civilian. I can't speak to the other services, or the 1960's; But throughout the 1980's the USN published a monthly newsletter listing all of the various school and billet opportunities. I don't recall seeing the astronaut notices in it; but I didn't read it very closely. (My rate was Crit 1, which basically meant I wasn't going outside of the rate, and the opportunities to transfer early were essentially non existent.) I had enough that I was required to read that reading something that was a) not required and b) essentially non-applicable wasn't happening. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:39:59 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
wrote: "LaDonna Wyss is a LIAR!!!" wrote in message ... LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! So, can you or can you not provide verifiable references that will state whether or not her pants were on fire? ....Well, isn't that how you deal with highly contageous biopathogens? OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
"Ami Silberman" wrote in message ... Where in http://www.defenselink.mil/odam/omp/...ok/Pdf/DoD.PDF, which is the organization of the DoD, is NASA? How dare you use facts against Stuffie! NASA paychecks come from the same place that military paychecks come from, the US Treasury. Since NASA paychecks look just like military paychecks, it's obvious that NASA is part of the military. |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
"Ami Silberman" wrote in message ... That still doesn't make everything involved with the Cold War part of the defense establishment, the military, or the DoD. I was involved in the Cold War. I served as a target. That must mean I was in the military! Where's my VA card? |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... This started when someone claimed these guys "applied" for their jobs as NASA. I countered by saying they were summoned without knowing why. The known, verifiable facts support "someone"'s claim and not yours. You are welcome to provide verifiable evidence to the contrary. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss is a LIAR!!!" wrote in message ... LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! So, can you or can you not provide verifiable references that will state whether or not her pants were on fire? Wow. How very adult of you. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Mar 19 | Stuart Goldman | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 20th 04 03:20 AM |
Good news and bad about Mars rover... | Steven James Forsberg | Policy | 2 | January 26th 04 11:12 AM |
Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jan 9 | Stuart Goldman | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | January 10th 04 02:34 AM |
Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Sep 12 | Stuart Goldman | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 13th 03 02:45 AM |
news flash! Rutan drops the shapceship! | Rand Simberg | Policy | 3 | August 8th 03 11:14 PM |