Why I am ****ed with NASA gaian

Here comes a freaking NASA 'expert' and states that Russian meteorite had nothing to do with the one that came yesterday.
While every half grown child astronomer knows that meteorites break up,
sometimes because of solar radiation, and then are accompanied by all sort of debris,
some with lighter mass may head for earth on a slightly faster trajectory.
Or is it just anti-public-panic-jive?

**** science is my opinion.

Make you wonder^H^H^H^H^H^H hope if that one in 2025 is heading for wherever the f*ck it
is then that those 'experts' are.

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:34:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje
wrote:

Here comes a freaking NASA 'expert' and states that Russian meteorite had nothing to do with the one that came yesterday.
While every half grown child astronomer knows that meteorites break up,
sometimes because of solar radiation, and then are accompanied by all sort of debris,
some with lighter mass may head for earth on a slightly faster trajectory.
Or is it just anti-public-panic-jive?

The meteor that exploded over Russia was travelling from the northeast
to southwest, while the asteroid was moving from south to north. In
other words, they were moving in nearly opposite directions, so they
could not be associated.

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:28:37 -0600) it happened Mark Sieving
wrote in
:

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:34:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje
wrote:

Here comes a freaking NASA 'expert' and states that Russian meteorite had nothing to do with the one that came yesterday.
While every half grown child astronomer knows that meteorites break up,
sometimes because of solar radiation, and then are accompanied by all sort of debris,
some with lighter mass may head for earth on a slightly faster trajectory.
Or is it just anti-public-panic-jive?

The meteor that exploded over Russia was travelling from the northeast
to southwest, while the asteroid was moving from south to north. In
other words, they were moving in nearly opposite directions, so they
could not be associated.

Half orbit.

Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:28:37 -0600) it happened Mark
Sieving wrote in
:

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:34:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje
wrote:

Here comes a freaking NASA 'expert' and states that Russian
meteorite had nothing to do with the one that came yesterday. While
every half grown child astronomer knows that meteorites break up,
sometimes because of solar radiation, and then are accompanied by
all sort of debris,
some with lighter mass may head for earth on a slightly faster
trajectory.
Or is it just anti-public-panic-jive?

The meteor that exploded over Russia was travelling from the
northeast to southwest, while the asteroid was moving from south to
north. In other words, they were moving in nearly opposite
directions, so they could not be associated.

Half orbit.

Half wit?

--
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:04:10 -0000) it happened "Mike Dworetsky"
wrote in
:

Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:28:37 -0600) it happened Mark
Sieving wrote in
:

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:34:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje
wrote:

Here comes a freaking NASA 'expert' and states that Russian
meteorite had nothing to do with the one that came yesterday. While
every half grown child astronomer knows that meteorites break up,
sometimes because of solar radiation, and then are accompanied by
all sort of debris,
some with lighter mass may head for earth on a slightly faster
trajectory.
Or is it just anti-public-panic-jive?

The meteor that exploded over Russia was travelling from the
northeast to southwest, while the asteroid was moving from south to
north. In other words, they were moving in nearly opposite
directions, so they could not be associated.

Half orbit.

Half wit?

Well then you cannot understand that,
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)

Clearly

Jan Panteltje wrote:
Here comes a freaking NASA 'expert' and states that Russian meteorite
had nothing to do with the one that came yesterday. While every half
grown child astronomer knows that meteorites break up,
sometimes because of solar radiation, and then are accompanied by all
sort of debris,
some with lighter mass may head for earth on a slightly faster
trajectory.

In that case, they would still be more or less on the same orbit, but spread
out along it, exactly the way meteor showers are from particles spread out
along the orbital path of a comet. They would not be on radically different
orbits with very different inclinations.

Usually, if there is a "NASA expert" on the news commenting on the orbits of
different objects, they do speak with authority because much of their
professional work involves calculating orbits of solar system bodies,
including meteors/meteorites. That's what makes them experts.

Or is it just anti-public-panic-jive?

No. Hollywood does a good enough job on that.


**** science is my opinion.

Are you qualified to give such an opinion? Do you routinely calculate
orbits of asteroids or work on the problem of calculating orbits for meteors
based on their final descent into the Earth's atmosphere? Have you ever
done such work, even as an amateur? Somehow I doubt it.

Make you wonder^H^H^H^H^H^H hope if that one in 2025 is heading for
wherever the f*ck it
is then that those 'experts' are.

You want them all to voyage into deep space to rendezvous with the asteroid?
Why? It won't be hitting Earth.

--
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)