|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell
thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn’t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that’s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass. If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e43 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where’s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? http://www.1728.org/diam.htm http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity Of course once inside of this extremely thin EH shell is going to represent zero gravity regardless of the EH shell density and its mass, offering a light year diameter sphere of containing whatever. Changing the EH shell diameter and its thickness to suit whatever you like, and run the math through these same online calculators in order to test out your ideas as to what a hollow BH could have to offer. Filling this hollow BH with weird aether or whatever else you can think of, as such will only add to the escape velocity, such as including an enormous solar system of 2e31 kg is literally adding a mere drop to this enormous bucket of mass. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ... An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn’t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that’s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass. If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e43 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where’s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? because "We" are not in charge.....idiot |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
Dear Brad Guth:
On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 6:49:12 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: .... An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of Nothing finite can stop infalling matter, at the event horizon. Within the event horizon, is not truly part of this Universe any longer. David A. Smith |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell
thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn’t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that’s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass. If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e46 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where’s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? http://www.1728.org/diam.htm http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity Of course once inside of this extremely thin EH shell is going to represent zero gravity regardless of the EH shell density and its mass, offering a light year diameter sphere of containing whatever. Changing the EH shell diameter and its thickness to suit whatever you like, and run the math through these same online calculators in order to test out your ideas as to what a hollow BH or EH could have to offer. Filling this hollow BH or EH with weird aether or whatever else you can think of, as such will only add to the escape velocity, such as including an enormous solar system of 2e31 kg is literally adding a mere drop to this enormous bucket of mass, and the same goes for packing our EH hollow sphere with aether worth 2e33 kg is still insignificant. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”, GuthVenus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 6, 9:18*am, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ... An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass. *If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e43 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? because "We" are not in charge.....idiot If more solid means less space between particles a black hole is a super-solid. My "critical mass density theory" has to how this is reality TreBert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 6, 6:18*am, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? because "We" are not in charge.....idiot Who is "We"? Naturally if you consider us independent outsiders as "We", then you are 100% correct by stipulating that "We" are not in charge. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 6, 6:28*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:18*am, "David Staup" wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message So, where's the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? because "We" are not in charge.....idiot If more solid means less space between particles a black hole is a super-solid. *My "critical mass density theory" has to how this is reality *TreBert But only the EH has to be packed solid, such as a solid form of helium represented by .214 g/cm3, and thereby leaving its innards quite hollow. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 6, 9:35*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Feb 6, 6:28*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: On Feb 6, 9:18*am, "David Staup" wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message So, where's the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? because "We" are not in charge.....idiot If more solid means less space between particles a black hole is a super-solid. *My "critical mass density theory" has to how this is reality *TreBert But only the EH has to be packed solid, such as a solid form of helium represented by .214 g/cm3, and thereby leaving its innards quite hollow. Any idea that the ratio of dark to luminous matter might have anything to do with whether the galaxy is young (i.e. emission of bipolar cosmic jets), or older, more super-massive Abell type galaxy? Here's a chart showing the dark matter distribution, which "peaks" in dark matter for clustered galaxies, at an observed Hubble shift of around v = 0.75: http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/3239/darkmatter.jpg Perhaps the age of the galaxy on both sides of the hump, is an indicator of Hawking radiation (intense gravitational field causes particle/antiparticle creation, allowing one particle to escape, and the other to fall into the black hole - the escaped particle annhilates with an escaping anti-particle (Hawking radiation)), i.e. which is practically non-existent for large galaxies, or medium galaxies beyond their 'dark matter' prime. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
An event horizon is not a thing. It is not composed of anything. It
is a locus of points. You cannot make an event horizon detector because there is nothing to detect. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message
... An event horizon is not a thing. It is not composed of anything. It is a locus of points. You cannot make an event horizon detector because there is nothing to detect. ================================================== ===== Energy is not a thing. It is not composed of anything. It is a focus of temperature. You cannot make an energy detector because there is nothing to detect. Oops! yes you can. A Crapinale is a thing. It is composed of something. It is an idiot. You can make a Crapinale detector because it babbles nonsense about nonsense. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 99 | May 16th 07 06:20 AM |
Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational (what if its a Lemon?) | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | May 14th 07 12:46 PM |
A Hollow Black Hole? | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 14 | March 31st 07 09:26 AM |
Black hole boldly goes where no black hole has gone before (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 4th 07 09:49 PM |
Black hole boldly goes where no black hole has gone before (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 4th 07 09:49 PM |