|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MAXWELL'S ELECTRODYNAMICS AND THE SPEED OF LIGHT
According to Maxwell's electrodynamics, the speed of light is
independent of the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed of the observer (that is, it is inconsistent with Einstein's special relativity). Einsteinians know that but they also know that the lie: "By 1905 Maxwell's electrodynamics had already established that the speed of light is independent of the motion of both the emitter and the observer" is crucial for the existence of Einsteiniana. Still sometimes (very rarely) careless Einsteinians do tell the truth. Here are one explicit and one implicit (John Norton hints at the truth by not mentioning the observer) confessions: http://www.futura-sciences.com/fr/do...509/c3/221/p5/ "Les équations de Maxwell prévoyaient la propagation de la lumière à la vitesse de 300.000 km/s par rapport à l'éther. Or, si l'on cherche à calculer la vitesse de la lumière par rapport à un référentiel qui est lui-même mobile dans l'éther, on observe que la lumière se propage avec une vitesse différente..." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/companion.doc John Norton: "Einstein's second postulate, the light postulate, asserts that "light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." Einstein gave no justification for this postulate in the introduction to his paper. Its strongest justification came from Maxwell's electrodynamics. That theory had identified light with waves propagating in an electromagnetic field and concluded that just one speed was possible for them in empty space, c = 300,000 km/sec, no matter what the motion of the emitter." Countless blatant lies: http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html "Moving observer: A man is standing on the beach, watching the tide. The waves are washing into the shore and over his feet with a constant frequency and wavelength. However, if he begins walking out into the ocean, the waves will begin hitting him more frequently, leading him to perceive that the wavelength of the waves has decreased. Again, this phenomenon is due to the fact that the source and the observer are not the in the same frame of reference. Although the wavelength appears to have decreased to the man, the wavelength would appear constant to a jellyfish floating along with the tide." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...ang/index.html John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)." http://www.math.mcgill.ca/lseguin/physique.php "Donc, Maxwell se demanda: "Mais pourquoi donc mes paramètres correspondent-ils à la vitesse de la lumière ?" Et il fit des calculs palpitants pendant longtemps. Après des heures de plaisir, il trouva que ses équations prédisaient une vitesse c pour les ondes électromagnétiques (la lumière par exemple) et que cette vitesse c était une constante, peut importe le référentiel. Donc, peut importe qui mesure la vitesse de la lumière, ça sera toujours c." http://www.techno-science.net/?ongle...efinition=1711 "D'après les théories de la physique moderne, et notamment les équations de Maxwell, la lumière visible (La lumière visible, appelée aussi spectre visible ou spectre optique est la partie du spectre électromagnétique qui est...) et toutes les ondes électromagnétiques ont une vitesse constante dans le vide, la vitesse de la lumière. On la considère donc comme une constante physique (En science, une constante physique est une quantité physique dont la valeur numérique est fixe. Contrairement à une...) notée c (du latin celeritas, « vitesse »). Mais elle n'est pas seulement constante (pense-t-on) en tous les endroits (et à tous les âges) de l'univers (On nomme univers l'ensemble de tout ce qui existe, comprenant la totalité des êtres et des choses (celle-ci comprenant...) (principes cosmologiques faible et fort, respectivement) ; elle l'est également d'un repère inertiel à un autre (principe d'équivalence restreint). En d'autres termes : quel que soit le repère inertiel de référence d'un observateur ou la vitesse de l'objet émettant la lumière, tout observateur obtiendra la même mesure." Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
MAXWELL'S ELECTRODYNAMICS AND THE SPEED OF LIGHT
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message ... According to Maxwell's electrodynamics, the speed of light is independent of the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed of the observer. wrong, try again snip rest |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
MAXWELL'S ELECTRODYNAMICS AND THE SPEED OF LIGHT
"mary" wrote in message ... "Pentcho Valev" wrote in message ... According to Maxwell's electrodynamics, the speed of light is independent of the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed of the observer. You ****ing queer. *plonk* Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated; you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive, unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread. Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are left to decide which is most applicable to you. There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill- filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the same spot and repeat the process eternally. This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry or crackpot theories without challenge. You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I purchase a new computer or hard drive. Update: the last clearance was 25/12/09. Some individuals have been restored to the list. I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose of this message is to encourage others to kill-file ****wits like you. I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't, damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and **** off. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light??? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 12:48 AM |
Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed. | [email protected] | Misc | 20 | September 4th 06 06:34 PM |
New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | September 27th 05 09:28 PM |
parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299 thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions | Roger Wilco | Misc | 1 | December 30th 03 10:15 PM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |