|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
Apologies for the crosspost, but this is related to many areas. Is anyone aware
of any physical/chemical/nuclear processes which propagate at rates faster than exponential? From my search so far, it appears that the fastest processes available, like cancer and viruses in biology, and nuclear explosions and supernova explosions in physics all propagate at most exponentially. Many thanks, -- Ioannis |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
On Jan 15, 11:14*am, "I.N. Galidakis" wrote:
Apologies for the crosspost, but this is related to many areas. Is anyone aware of any physical/chemical/nuclear processes which propagate at rates faster than exponential? From my search so far, it appears that the fastest processes available, like cancer and viruses in biology, and nuclear explosions and supernova explosions in physics all propagate at most exponentially. Some processes are too fast to even have a decent way to categorize the rate. Take, for instance, the chemical core of a nuclear device. The pieces are set off simultaneously so that the reaction need not progress from a single point of ignition. The limit on the reaction rate is the number of detonators used and the precision with which they can be set off. Rather than being a log, a cube root, a square root or linear in the reactant size, the reaction time can be held constant. That's without considering Thiotimoline, a substance which, when purified by repeated resublimation has a solubility reaction rate that goes endochronic. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
On Jan 15, 9:14*pm, "I.N. Galidakis" wrote:
Apologies for the crosspost, but this is related to many areas. Is anyone aware of any physical/chemical/nuclear processes which propagate at rates faster than exponential? From my search so far, it appears that the fastest processes available, like cancer and viruses in biology, and nuclear explosions and supernova explosions in physics all propagate at most exponentially. Throw an Object in a Black hole. It will be faster than a Exponential. Bye Sanny Know the strangest things from computers mouth. http://www.GetClub.com You can just chat with the computer on physics. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
On 15 Jan, 16:14, "I.N. Galidakis" wrote:
Apologies for the crosspost, but this is related to many areas. Is anyone aware of any physical/chemical/nuclear processes which propagate at rates faster than exponential? From my search so far, it appears that the fastest processes available, like cancer and viruses in biology, and nuclear explosions and supernova explosions in physics all propagate at most exponentially. Many thanks, -- Ioannis i think some pulse lasers' amplitudes do. any process that has a combinatorial component might well do. genetics? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
Well, for anyone that hasn't kill filed me, the "worthless caveat" is
essential to the OP's question. Would as x-oo, for all t, f(x)/e^xt - oo be an adequate definition for a function with faster than exponential growth? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
"I.N. Galidakis" wrote in message news:1263572066.510809@athprx04... Apologies for the crosspost, but this is related to many areas. Is anyone aware of any physical/chemical/nuclear processes which propagate at rates faster than exponential? From my search so far, it appears that the fastest processes available, like cancer and viruses in biology, and nuclear explosions and supernova explosions in physics all propagate at most exponentially. Many thanks, -- Ioannis There seems to be a few examples of double exponential i.e. exp(exp(x)) see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_...nction#Physics factorials or gamma function are also faster then exp |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
Robert wrote:
Well, for anyone that hasn't kill filed me, the "worthless caveat" is essential to the OP's question. Would as x-oo, for all t, f(x)/e^xt - oo be an adequate definition for a function with faster than exponential growth? Yes. Sorry for the (created) confusion. As far as I am concerned, I mean anything like: f(x) ~ a^x, with a e. Thanks again to all the responders. -- Ioannis |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
Rod wrote:
"I.N. Galidakis" wrote in message news:1263572066.510809@athprx04... Apologies for the crosspost, but this is related to many areas. Is anyone aware of any physical/chemical/nuclear processes which propagate at rates faster than exponential? From my search so far, it appears that the fastest processes available, like cancer and viruses in biology, and nuclear explosions and supernova explosions in physics all propagate at most exponentially. Many thanks, -- Ioannis There seems to be a few examples of double exponential i.e. exp(exp(x)) see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_...nction#Physics factorials or gamma function are also faster then exp Thanks. That's one example. So the bound now moves to exp(exp(x)). -- Ioannis |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
On 15 Jan, 19:09, "I.N. Galidakis" wrote:
Robert wrote: Well, for anyone that hasn't kill filed me, the "worthless caveat" is essential to the OP's question. Would *as x-oo, for all t, f(x)/e^xt - oo be an adequate definition for a function with faster than exponential growth? Yes. Sorry for the (created) confusion. As far as I am concerned, I mean anything like: f(x) ~ a^x, with a e. Thanks again to all the responders. -- Ioannis in that case androcles is right and there are millions of examples. so the question is pretty trivial. a^x, even with a e, *is* exponential growth. a^x = e^(x ln(a)). in other words all the a not being e does is change the growth constant, but it's still exponential. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Processes which propagate faster than exponentially
"I.N. Galidakis" wrote in message news:1263582569.638801@athprx04... Robert wrote: Well, for anyone that hasn't kill filed me, the "worthless caveat" is essential to the OP's question. Would as x-oo, for all t, f(x)/e^xt - oo be an adequate definition for a function with faster than exponential growth? Yes. Sorry for the (created) confusion. As far as I am concerned, I mean anything like: f(x) ~ a^x, with a e. Thanks again to all the responders. -- Ioannis a^x = (exp(ln(a)))^x = exp(ln(a) x) = exp(b.x) so this is not faster than exp things like exp(a.x^2) are faster and exp(exp(x)) is really fast. Look up tetration for something super fast but I don't know any physical process related to it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pigs paid by ZOG to propagate bullshit | Nomen Nescio | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 26th 09 05:50 PM |
video: Int. Spacecraft (Hinode) Reveals Detailed Processes on the Sun | AnonGoo | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 23rd 07 10:57 AM |
video: Int. Spacecraft (Hinode) Reveals Detailed Processes on the Sun | Starlord | Misc | 0 | March 23rd 07 03:48 AM |
International Spacecraft Reveals Detailed Processes on the Sun (Hinode) | AnonGoo | Policy | 0 | March 22nd 07 11:42 PM |