|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 9, 8:53*am, "Bast" wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn’t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that’s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass. *If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e43 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where’s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? *http://www.1728.org/diam.htm *http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity *Of course once inside of this extremely thin EH shell is going to represent zero gravity regardless of the EH shell density and its mass, offering a light year diameter sphere of containing whatever. Changing the EH shell diameter and its thickness to suit whatever you like, and run the math through these same online calculators in order to test out your ideas as to what a hollow BH could have to offer. Filling this hollow BH with weird aether or whatever else you can think of, as such will only add to the escape velocity, such as including an enormous solar system of 2e31 kg is literally adding a mere drop to this enormous bucket of mass. You don't even need math to understand that a visible event horizion of any size, surrounding only a singularity of infinitely small mass and size ...You have a hollow sphere of nothingness. This hollow volume of the sphere is illusory. inside this sphere you speak of, space would be contracting faster than the speed of light. Singularity Plus Gravity turns into "Length" "Length" plus "Rotation" turns into "surface area", or one radian of length times one radian of rotation = c squared Surface area turns into "Volume" Volume turns into "Space time" Hollow sphere of 'VACUUM ENERGY" = Space is energy. rotation is energy |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 8, 9:34*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Feb 8, 5:55*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: On Feb 7, 8:30*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: On Feb 6, 6:13*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Feb 6, 6:27*am, Brad Guth wrote: An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn’t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that’s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass.. *If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e46 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where’s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? *http://www.1728.org/diam.htm *http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity *Of course once inside of this extremely thin EH shell is going to represent zero gravity regardless of the EH shell density and its mass, offering a light year diameter sphere of containing whatever. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 9, 6:53*am, "Bast" wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn’t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that’s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass. *If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e43 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where’s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? *http://www.1728.org/diam.htm *http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity *Of course once inside of this extremely thin EH shell is going to represent zero gravity regardless of the EH shell density and its mass, offering a light year diameter sphere of containing whatever. Changing the EH shell diameter and its thickness to suit whatever you like, and run the math through these same online calculators in order to test out your ideas as to what a hollow BH could have to offer. Filling this hollow BH with weird aether or whatever else you can think of, as such will only add to the escape velocity, such as including an enormous solar system of 2e31 kg is literally adding a mere drop to this enormous bucket of mass. You don't even need math to understand that a visible event horizion of any size, surrounding only a singularity of infinitely small mass and size ...You have a hollow sphere of nothingness. Exactly, and everything inside of that EH sphere of nothingness has to be a volume of zero gravity, as possibly filled with a great deal of aether. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 6, 8:19*am, dlzc wrote:
Dear Brad Guth: On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 6:49:12 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: ... An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of Nothing finite can stop infalling matter, at the event horizon. *Within the event horizon, is not truly part of this Universe any longer. David A. Smith http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXT_B4kx6YA http://www.crystalinks.com/meteors.html Nice Premonition Mr David |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
On Feb 6, 5:49*am, Brad Guth wrote:
An EH(event horizon) sphere of 1 ly diameter and having a shell thickness of .0001 ly (9.4605e8 km) offers a thin shell volume of 2.666e44 m3 It really doesn’t take all that much math in order to establish that a EH thin shell comprised of 1g/cm3 density would amount to 2.666e47 kg, giving a surface escape velocity demand of 8.674e7 km/sec or 289 times faster than the speed of light, and that’s if the entire internal volume of this EH sphere were absolutely devoid of any other mass. *If this same thin EH shell was instead comprised of a superfluid of solid helium at .214 g/cm3 would still easily provide more than sufficient mass of 5.7e43 kg, so that its escape velocity of 4.01e7 km/sec at the EH surface of solid helium is offering 134 times greater than the speed of light. So, where’s the need of any solid BH body of mass? Why not permit hollow and empty EH spheres to exist? *http://www.1728.org/diam.htm *http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity *Of course once inside of this extremely thin EH shell is going to represent zero gravity regardless of the EH shell density and its mass, offering a light year diameter sphere of containing whatever. Changing the EH shell diameter and its thickness to suit whatever you like, and run the math through these same online calculators in order to test out your ideas as to what a hollow BH could have to offer. Filling this hollow BH with weird aether or whatever else you can think of, as such will only add to the escape velocity, such as including an enormous solar system of 2e31 kg is literally adding a mere drop to this enormous bucket of mass. How can anything get past the event horizon in order to fill up or contribute as to the innards or core volume and mass of any black hole? Why wouldn't the EH shell itself become massive, with zero gravity inside of this EH shell? |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
How solid or hollow is a BH(black hole)?
Dear Brad Guth:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 6:20:42 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: .... How can anything get past the event horizon in order to fill up or contribute as to the innards or core volume and mass of any black hole? Nothing is at rest there. How can you stop time? Why wouldn't the EH shell itself become massive, with zero gravity inside of this EH shell? No finite force could keep something there. David A. Smith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 99 | May 16th 07 06:20 AM |
Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational (what if its a Lemon?) | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | May 14th 07 12:46 PM |
A Hollow Black Hole? | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 14 | March 31st 07 09:26 AM |
Black hole boldly goes where no black hole has gone before (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 4th 07 09:49 PM |
Black hole boldly goes where no black hole has gone before (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 4th 07 09:49 PM |