MAXWELL'S ELECTRODYNAMICS AND THE SPEED OF LIGHT

According to Maxwell's electrodynamics, the speed of light is
independent of the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed
of the observer (that is, it is inconsistent with Einstein's special
relativity). Einsteinians know that but they also know that the lie:

"By 1905 Maxwell's electrodynamics had already established that the
speed of light is independent of the motion of both the emitter and
the observer"

is crucial for the existence of Einsteiniana. Still sometimes (very
rarely) careless Einsteinians do tell the truth. Here are one explicit
and one implicit (John Norton hints at the truth by not mentioning the
observer) confessions:

http://www.futura-sciences.com/fr/do...509/c3/221/p5/
"Les équations de Maxwell prévoyaient la propagation de la lumière à
la vitesse de 300.000 km/s par rapport à l'éther. Or, si l'on cherche
à calculer la vitesse de la lumière par rapport à un référentiel qui
est lui-même mobile dans l'éther, on observe que la lumière se propage
avec une vitesse différente..."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/companion.doc
John Norton: "Einstein's second postulate, the light postulate,
asserts that "light is always propagated in empty space with a
definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the
emitting body." Einstein gave no justification for this postulate in
the introduction to his paper. Its strongest justification came from
Maxwell's electrodynamics. That theory had identified light with waves
propagating in an electromagnetic field and concluded that just one
speed was possible for them in empty space, c = 300,000 km/sec, no
matter what the motion of the emitter."

Countless blatant lies:

http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html
"Moving observer: A man is standing on the beach, watching the tide.
The waves are washing into the shore and over his feet with a constant
frequency and wavelength. However, if he begins walking out into the
ocean, the waves will begin hitting him more frequently, leading him
to perceive that the wavelength of the waves has decreased. Again,
this phenomenon is due to the fact that the source and the observer
are not the in the same frame of reference. Although the wavelength
appears to have decreased to the man, the wavelength would appear
constant to a jellyfish floating along with the tide."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...ang/index.html
John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer
were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now
pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would
mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to
have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE
BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)."

http://www.math.mcgill.ca/lseguin/physique.php
"Donc, Maxwell se demanda: "Mais pourquoi donc mes paramètres
correspondent-ils à la vitesse de la lumière ?" Et il fit des calculs
palpitants pendant longtemps. Après des heures de plaisir, il trouva
que ses équations prédisaient une vitesse c pour les ondes
électromagnétiques (la lumière par exemple) et que cette vitesse c
était une constante, peut importe le référentiel. Donc, peut importe
qui mesure la vitesse de la lumière, ça sera toujours c."

http://www.techno-science.net/?ongle...efinition=1711
"D'après les théories de la physique moderne, et notamment les
équations de Maxwell, la lumière visible (La lumière visible, appelée
aussi spectre visible ou spectre optique est la partie du spectre
électromagnétique qui est...) et toutes les ondes électromagnétiques
ont une vitesse constante dans le vide, la vitesse de la lumière. On
la considère donc comme une constante physique (En science, une
constante physique est une quantité physique dont la valeur numérique
est fixe. Contrairement à une...) notée c (du latin celeritas, «
vitesse »). Mais elle n'est pas seulement constante (pense-t-on) en
tous les endroits (et à tous les âges) de l'univers (On nomme univers
l'ensemble de tout ce qui existe, comprenant la totalité des êtres et
des choses (celle-ci comprenant...) (principes cosmologiques faible et
fort, respectivement) ; elle l'est également d'un repère inertiel à un
autre (principe d'équivalence restreint). En d'autres termes : quel
que soit le repère inertiel de référence d'un observateur ou la
vitesse de l'objet émettant la lumière, tout observateur obtiendra la
même mesure."

Pentcho Valev

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
...
According to Maxwell's electrodynamics, the speed of light is
independent of the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed
of the observer.

wrong, try again

snip rest

"mary" wrote in message
...

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
...
According to Maxwell's electrodynamics, the speed of light is
independent of the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed
of the observer.


You ****ing queer.
*plonk*

Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated;
you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive,
unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic
subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising
for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George
Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination
or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread.

Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because
this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are
left to decide which is most applicable to you.

There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically
admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would
wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill-
filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value
as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the
dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the
same spot and repeat the process eternally.

This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing
that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry
or crackpot theories without challenge.

You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The
kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I
purchase a new computer or hard drive.
Update: the last clearance was 25/12/09. Some individuals have been
restored to the list.

I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose
of this message is to encourage others to kill-file ****wits like you.

I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't,
damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and **** off.