U.S. ANTHROPOLOGISTS PHONIER THAN $4 BILL -- Testing Proves Ed Conrad CORRECT -- MAN AS OLD AS COAL -- Lin Liangtai of Taiwan Proves Existence of Conspiracy Against Truth --

EVALUATION OF A "CARBONIFEROUS HUMAN CALVARIUM FOSSIL"

The following report (below) was prepared by Lin Liangtai, a scholar
and scientist in Taipei, Taiwan. He and I never met but Liangtai was
impressed with my discoveries of petrified bones, teeth and soft
organs -- some human -- between anthracite veins in Pennsylvania.

He communicated with me and his honesty and sincerity came shining
through. So I sent him some of my specimens so he could conduct
exhaustive testing.

His results confirm -- BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT -- that
the specimens ARE petrified bones, teeth and soft organs -- some
human -- which provides the physical evidence that man existed during,
or even before, the time that anthracite coal was formed.

It also proves BEYOND ALL DOUBT, that the Darwinian Theory of Man's
Evolution is a myth, as I've been insisting for more than two decades.

Man, in almost our present form, inhabited the earth EONS before
Charles Darwin put us here.

My hat is off to Lin Liangtai, who has confirmed that members of the
entire Scientific Establishment are totally corrupt -- actually,
members of a PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC Establishment -- who have NOT
sought truth about man's origin and ancestry but have gone along with
a COLLOSAL LIE to protect their vested interests.

Before presenting Lin Liantai's exhaustive report, here are photos of
some of my incredible discoveries as well as my Web page which
shows, among other things, how the so-called prestigious Smithsonian
Institution has been part of deceit, deception, collusion and
conspiracy.

I might add that the petrified human calvarium and both petrified
fingers, with fingernails, were found after the Web page was put
up on the Internet and has never been updated.

==================================================

http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...soldemboss.gif

TRUTH VS. THE MONUMENTAL LIE OF MAN'S EVOLUTION
(Fossils -- SOME HUMAN -- Found Between Coal Veins)

http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...HumanSkull.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...sOldasCoal.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...iscoveries.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...oreFossils.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...HumanBrain.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...estResults.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/F...OldestTool.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/Scorpion.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/MVC-013F.JPG

=================

To prove they're the real McCoy:

PETRIFIED FOSSILS STILL EMBEDDED IN SLATE

http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-002S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-003S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-006S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-007S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-009S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-010S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-012S.JPG

Ed Conrad
Man as Old as Coal
http://www.edconrad.com

==============================================
==============================================

LIN LIANGTAI'S REPORT

(Note: To see photos to which Lin Liangtai is referring, see his
original Web page at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315

===============================================

ABSTRACT

The author (Lin Liangtai) has examined through microscopes more
than 20 thin sections cut from "rocks" that Mr. Ed Conrad discovered
and sent to the author (Fig. 7).

Without exception, they are all found to be fossils, including the
subject "calvarium fossil" (Fig. 1).

The object is a Carboniferous human calvarium fossil for the following
reasons:

(1) it contains numerous fossilized red blood cells in each thin
section that has been made from it;

(2) it contains fossilized dendrites and somas of brain cells;

(3) No other animal has an organ or body part that matches its
inner/outer shape and size;

(4) Its inner cavity has a capacity of at least 1,025 cc.; (5)

It was found between coal veins near Mahanoy City, Pennsylvania
(U.S.A.) where geological structure has been dated to be around 300
million years old.

The fossil’s blood vessels have turned into coal, suggesting it once
existed in a coal region. Even if it did not come from the
Carboniferous age, the fact that it is fossilized and coalified would
still make it the oldest human skull cap ever found in the world.

In addition to the subject fossil, there are at least four other
pieces of evidence for human civilization in the Carboniferous age.
Mankind needs no more than eight thousand years to develop from a
low-tech society to a high-tech society.

INTRODUCTION

A "calvarium fossil" (fig. 1), discovered and owned by Mr. Ed Conrad
of Shenandoah, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., has been considered for over 25
years to be just a rock, while its owner keeps maintaining that it is
a Carboniferous human calvarium fossil.

This article attempts to evaluate the object by answering the
following related questions in the discussion part in the following
order:

1. Is it a fossil?

2. Is it a calvarium fossil?

3. Is it a human calvarium fossil?

4 Is it a Carboniferous human calvarium fossil?

5. Are there evidences for human civilization in the Carboniferous
age?

6.Was there high-tech civilization in the Carboniferous age? How does
one know that?

7. Further discussion/Attempts to disprove myself .

A calvarium is a skull without the lower jaw/the facial parts, whereas
a cranium refers to skull bones that enclose the brain (Ref. 1). A
calvarium could possibly contain a part of brain remains/fossil. The
specimens used in this evaluation came from the interior of the
object.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Material A:

On the author’s request, the owner of the "fossil" cut a small
specimen from the interior of the object, took pictures of the spot
from which the specimen was cut, and sent the specimen to the author
by post.

The specimen arrived in the following conditions:

1. A chunk of "fossil" about 1.5 cm long, 1 cm wide, and 0.5 cm thick.

2. Three small fragments that crumbled out of the above chunk when the
author took up the chunk to look at it for the first time. The three
fragments measure about 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm x 0.2 cm each.

3. Dozens of small grains, each measuring less than 0.2cm in any
dimension. These grains had gone loose from the chunk during its
transport by post and its handling by the author.

Above three kinds of specimens were taken to the geology department of
National Taiwan University to be made into thin sections 1, 2 and 3
respectively in the following methods. The methods involved no
artificial staining of colors.

1. Thin section 1 (Fig. 2): Specimen 1 was cut for transverse and
longitudinal sections, which were then ground and mounted onto a glass
slide, namely thin section 1. One third of Specimen 1 was left from
the process of making the thin section (Fig. 2-1).

2. Thin section 2 (Fig. 2-2): Fragments of Specimen 2 were cut, ground
and mounted onto a glass slide. As this thin section was made too
thick for light to penetrate, it was not much used in this study.

3. Thin section 3 (fig. 2-3) : Small grains from Specimen 3 were
placed in a mold that glued them firmly together, ground to a
thickness of about 0.03 mm, and then mounted to a glass slide, namely
thin section 3.

Thin section 1 and 3 were viewed through a microscope in transmitted
light and photographed with a camera (Canon model EOS 350D).

Material B: the "calvarium fossil"

The author asked the owner of the "fossil" to measure the object and
got the following data:

Outer dimensions of the object: 22.8 cm (maximum length) by 17.8 cm
(maximum width) by 13.3 cm (maximum height)

The owner advised the author that on the top side of the object, there
seems to be a 6-mm-thick coating of foreign substance. To be on the
safe side, the author subtracts twice that thickness—6mm x 2—from the
above outer length , outer width, and subtracts 6 mm from its exterior
maximum height. Hence, the following figures are obtained and used for
calculating its cranial capacity:

Outer dimensions: 21.6 cm (Length) by 16.6 cm (Width) by 12.7 cm
(Height)

Inner cavity dimensions: 15.9 cm (maximum length) by 10.8 cm (maximum
width) by 11.4 cm (maximum depth/height)

Based on the above data, the author calculated the cranial capacity of
the object as follows:

1. Lee Pearson Formula, given by Williams et al (1995) and Manjunath
(2002b) (ref. 2).

For males: 0.000337 x (L-11) x (W-11) x (H-11) + 406.01

As the above length, width, and height are all expressed in
millimeter, the following calculation is done:

0.000337 x (216-11) x (166-11) x (127-11) + 406.01=1,648 cc

For females:

0.0004 x (L-11) x (W-11) x (H-11) + 206.60

Hence, the following calculation is done:

0.0004 x (216-11) x (166-11) x (127-11) + 206.60 =1,681 cc

Mean cranial capacity: (1648+1681) divided by 2 makes 1,665 cc.

As the gender of the "cranium" is unknown, only the mean figure is
considered here for convenience.

2. Spheroid Formula, given by Manjunath (2002b, ref. 3)

0.5238 x length x width x height(depth)= cranial capacity

Above length, width, and depth are measurements of the crania
cavity and expressed in centimeter.

Hence the calculation 0.5238x15.9x10.8x11.4=1,025 cc.

RESULTS

A. The estimated cranial capacity of the "calvarium" ranges from 1,025
cc to 1,665 cc as calculated in the above paragraph.

B. In thin sections 1 and 3, many fossilized red blood cells were
found (Figure 3). Some of them are round-shaped. Others are oval,
possibly because they have changed their round shape into oval shape
in order to pass through small capillaries.

C. In thin section 3, near the center is a small grain showing
fossilized dendrites of brain cells (figure 4) as well as the
above-mentioned red blood cells. In other spots in thin section 3,
there are also a few micro-structures looking like somas of fossilized
brain cells (figure 4-6).

D. Specimen 1 is found to have at least five black areas. One black
area is shiny black under naked eyes and microscopes. Microscopic
pictures reveal that the shiny black area contains carbonized blood
vessels and erythrocytes (Fig. 6-2).

DISCUSSIONS:

1. Is it a fossil?

My answer is yes. No rocks or plants contain so many fossilized red
blood cells (Fig. 3), some of which are still in blood vessels. They
are found in randomly-chosen, freshly-cut thin sections, not from
re-worked/contaminated tissues. Their colors are not artificially
stained.

2. Is it a calvarium fossil?

My answer is yes. No other animal organs or body parts have
inner/outer sizes and shapes similar to this fossil’s shapes and sizes
(Fig. 1). The existence of the degraded/fossilized dendrites and somas
of brain cells in Fig. 4 points to a calvarium fossil that once
contained brain cells.

3. Is it a human calvarium fossil?

My answer is yes. Its cranial capacity of at least 1,025 cc is
surpassed only by cetaceans, walrus, elephants, and/or dinosaurs (ref.
4). However, those four kinds of animal have no crania/organs that
match the subject fossil in cranial shape and size. As each order of
animal has a different shaped skull (ref. 5), the subject calvarium
can be easily identified to be a human calvarium fossil by forensic
experts on human skulls. One such expert is the late Mr. Wilton
Krogman, considered one of the author of the boo. He has physically
examined the calvarium fossil. His broad smile in the photo (fig. 1)
says to me that he confirmed it was a human calvarium fossil.

The calvarium fossil matches humans’ cranial size, cranial capacity
and cranial shape in the following ways:

3-1 Cranial size (outer dimensions):

Neanderthal: 24.1cm (length) x 14.6 cm (width) x 17.8 cm (height)
(ref. 6)

Subject fossil: 21.6 cm (length) x 16.6 cm (width) x 12.7 cm (height)

3-2 Cranial capacity:

Neanderthal: 1,750 cc (ref. 7)

Modern Human: 1,350-1,400 cc (ref. 8)

Java man: 940 cc (Homo Erectus, Trinil 2, Pithecanthropus I, ref. 9)

Subject fossil: at least 1,025 cc (by Spheroid Formula)

By the Lee Pearson Formula, the subject fossil has a cranial capacity
of 1,665 cc. The vast difference between 1,665 cc and 1,025 cc may be
due to the following factors:

A. The width of the inner cavity is only 60% of the fossil’s outer
width, as the fossil possibly retains fossilized brain matter on one
side of the inner cavity (See the bottom view of the fossil in Fig.
1);

B. The calvarium was broken in the facial part;

C. It has thick skull bones;

D. It could possibly have a 6-mm-thick coating of foreign substances
on its exterior;

3-3 Cranial shape:

Human: well-rounded cranium (ref. 10)

Java man: flat, very thick cranium (Homo Erectus, Trinil 2,
Pithecanthropus I) (Fig. 5 & ref. 9)

Subject fossil: More rounded than the above Java man (fig. 1 vs. fig.
5)

The above analysis shows the subject fossil matches human skull caps
in cranial size, capacity, and shape.

4. Is it a Carboniferous human calvarium fossil?

My judgment says yes.

For over 27 years, its owner has attested many times that all his
fossils were found between coal veins near Shenandoah and Mahanoy
City, Pennsylvania. That is in the anthracite region, the only one in
the U.S. proper. It’s a most-studied geological area of the
Carboniferous age.

That is to say any animal fossil found there must have lived there in
the Carboniferous age. The owner’s attestation is mirrored in Specimen
1 and its remnant.

Under naked eyes and microscopes, the specimen looks black and
shiny in some areas (Fig. 2-1).

Under the LED light of a digital microscope (ref. 11), the shiny black
area of Specimen 1 revealed its blood vessels that have carbonized
into coal (figure 6). The shiny black color is a sign of vitrain—a
thin, bright, horizontal band in bituminous coal that usually breaks
with a conchoidal fracture. The fossil’s black and shiny look suggests
its origin in a coal region.

Its owner has two other fossils that are also coalified. One such
fossil is a coalified axe handle (fig. 8). Another is a fossilized
human finger complete with skin tissue, finger nail, ligaments, and
the middle phalanx (figures 9, 9-1).

The finger shows signs of carbonization on the finger tip’s palm side
(fig. 9-2).

If Mr. Conrad lied to the experts about the fossils’ place of origin,
how could he vehemently accuse the experts (for 27 years!) of fooling
the general public in the interest of their own pocket books instead
of exposing the king’s new clothes? After all, a layman would need
greater courage to cheat the experts than the experts would need
courage to cheat the laymen.

Before Mr. Conrad found the subject calvarium fossil, he had found
hundreds of "fossils" at the same place. Why would he discover it
anywhere else when hundreds more of such fossils are still exposed
out there, outcropping from the big boulders in the region (Figure
10). He seldom took pictures of them before removing them. Was
he a layman who took every picture of his findings before removing
them from a dark coal mine?

From his physical, close contact with the "rocks", Mr. Conrad knew
better than anybody that his were not rocks. That’s why he kept
insisting for 27 years that they were not rocks. They include
unimaginable organs such as human liver, fingers, penises, testes,
kidneys, limb, etc. (fig. 7).

This fossil causes many questions to current theories about human
origins. If we avoid them, we are only fooling ourselves. If we face
them, they will bring us new horizon and new direction for human
civilization.

5. Are there evidences for human civilization in the Carboniferous
age?

Certainly. They are all shown in my albums (Figure 7).

The evidence for human civilization include: (1) a coalified axe
handle as well made as those sold on e-bay (the first four albums
in Fig. 7); (2) A manicured fingernail on a primate finger (Fig. 9,
Fig. 9-1); (3) A piece of limb cut flatly across soft flesh and hard
bone, as if with a sharp knife (Fig.11, Fig. 11-1); (4) Dinosaur bones
preserved by formaldehyde-like chemicals in the Cretaceous age.

Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer reported, in an article by Mr. PZ Myers, that
she smelled of the odor of the chemical when she was cutting T-Rex
dinosaur bones in preparation for bio-chemical tests. (5) Preservation
of individual soft organs down to the microscopic level for 300
million years. Soft organs such as liver, kidneys, testes, penises
(Fig. 12) were all individually and separately preserved in a manner
comparable to today’s embalming or plastination technique

6. Was there high-tech civilization in the Carboniferous age?

Certainly. Mankind took no more than eight thousand years to develop
from low-tech society to high-tech society. I have written about my
source and similar subjects in the talk. origins newsgroup.

7. FURTHER DISCUSSION -- Attempts to disprove myself

7-1 Couldn’t it be a rock?

Mr. Conrad’s fossils were dismissed as rocks mainly because they
were found in the Carboniferous strata, and no experts can explain
their existence. Experienced fossil handlers can recognize this is not
an ordinary rock simply by looking at Fig. 1. In that figure, there
was a gentleman holding this object. At the bottom is its inner cavity
covered with many small rings and dots. The bottom view of the object
also shows many black areas. These are unusual signs for a rock.
Besides my pictures, there are pictures by Mr. Andrew MacRae and Mr.
PZ Myers. The pictures (Figures 3-5, 3-6, 3-7) don’t show an ordinary
rock.

Few rocks have a shape and size that fully matches human skull
interior and exterior. As described in my answer to question 3 above,
this object fully matches human skull caps. More than twenty of Mr.
Conrad’s "rocks" (Fig. 7) contain degraded red blood cells.

Making no exception, the three thin sections that were cut from the
subject fossil show degraded mammalian red blood cells, dendrites and
somas of brain cells, blood vessels, etc. in natural condition.

Most of them are found where they should be. I have cut more than 20
thin sections from the “rocks” and taken more than 1,000 microscopic
pictures of the 20 fossils the owner has sent me.

Most of the jagged minerals found in the fossils are found trapped in
organic tissues such as blood vessels. These fossilized blood vessels
could not have gone into rocks/minerals, and then begun the
fossilization process and still remained jointed in natural posture.
The minerals were there because they went into the blood vessels
through holes in the organic objects. The minerals were not found
in a continuous formation, but the organic tissues/organs were found
in a continuous formation, retaining their original outer shapes (of
finger, calvarium, handle, liver, etc.) and cell structures.

Except the coalified axe handle, all fossils are animal rather than
plant fossils. Plant fossils are characterized by regular radial wood
structures in their transverse sections. Animal fossils show extreme
complexity in transverse section without the regular radial pattern of
wood tissues (rays, etc.). The subject fossils are too big to be fungi
or bacteria. Few rocks, if there is any, have been found to contain
numerous fossilized red blood cells, blood vessels, or brain cell
dendrites. None of such rocks matches human skull caps in size and
shape.

On the Internet, there are two articles that include microscopic
pictures of thin sections cut from the owner’s other “rocks”. Those
pictures actually show the “rocks” contain fossilized collagen and red
blood cells (Fig. 3-5, Fig. 3-6, Fig. 3-7), although no Haversian
canals are shown in the pictures. Many people have seen the pictures
but chose not to talk about the organics in the pictures.

7-2

Couldn’t it be something other than a calvarium?

The subject fossil has a deep, wide inner cavity that roughly matches
the outer shape of the fossil. Its large size and distinct shape
cannot be found in any organs other than skulls.

It contains fossilized nerve cell dendrites and somas which are not
found in any organ except in brains. Only skulls contain brain cells.
The fossilized parts of brain cells could only have come from a skull.
It is unlikely for brain cell parts to leave a skull, go into another
skull, get preserved and fossilized there in natural posture.

There is no reason to suspect this object was contaminated, since
dendrites of brain cells were found fossilized in a calvarium fossil,
just where they should be. No one has the right to dismiss it as a
rock or some unknown object after it was found to contain fossilized
mammalian red blood cells (Fig. 3), dendrites and somas of brain cells
(Fig. 4).

7-3

Couldn’t it be a non-human calvarium?

All crania have different, distinctive shapes among different orders
of animal (ref. 5). The fossil could only be that of mammals, because
it contained mammalian red blood cells. The erythrocytes in Fig. 3 are
uniquely mammalian, as they were biconcave for over50y percent of the
cell surfaces.

Non-mammalian vertebrates have erythrocytes that are oval and
biconvex. Only mammals have round and biconcave erythrocytes.
The author has compared the fossil with various skulls of mammals
and found only human skulls matched the fossil. No human skull
forensic experts could confidently dismiss it as a non-human skull cap
fossil, as human skull caps have a unique shape among mammalian skull
caps and the No. 1 distinction of human skulls lies in their large
cranial capacity. No other animal has a skull that remotely matches
human skulls in their cranial capacity, shape and size.

7-4
Couldn’t it be later than the Carboniferous age?

As stated in Section 7-1, Mr. Conrad’s fossils were dismissed as rocks
mainly because experts cannot explain why human fossils were found in
the Carboniferous strata. No one has really claimed that Mr. Conrad
lied about the place where the fossils were found—around his hometown
in the area of Shenandoah/Mahanoy City. Pennsylvania.

No one would believe that he found them in a foreign country or even
in another state when hundreds more of such fossils are still
outcropping there. Why would he lie about their place of origin when
he cared most about the “rocks’” being recognized as fossils? When his
rocks have been demonstrated to be fossils, they mean he was right all
along, including the fossils’ place of origin.

Even if it were not from the Carboniferous age, it is still the oldest
human skull cap in the world, as its blood vessels in the brain have
carbonized into shiny bituminous coal/anthracite (Fig. 2-1, Figures
6-1 to Fig. 6-4). Bituminous coal is at least ten million years old in
the U.S.A. No other human skull cap has ever been found to be so
old in the whole world.

CONCLUSION

The author has examined through microscopes more than 20 thin
sections cut from “rocks” that Mr. Ed Conrad discovered and sent
to the author.

Without exception, they are all found to be fossils, including the
subject “calvarium fossil”. The object is a Carboniferous human
calvarium fossil for the following reasons:

(1) it contains numerous fossilized red blood cells in each thin
section that has been made from it; (2) it contains fossilized
dendrites and somas of brain cells; (3) No other animal, except
humans, has an organ or body part that matches its inner/outer shape
and size; (4) Its inner cavity has a capacity of at least 1,025 cc.;
(5) It was found between coal veins near Mahanoy City, Pennsylvania,
where geological structure has been dated to be around 300 million
years old.

The fossil’s blood vessels have turned into coal, suggesting it once
existed in a coal region. Even if it did not come from the
Carboniferous age, the fact that it is fossilized and coalified would
still make it the oldest human skull cap ever found in the world.

In addition to the subject fossil, there are at least four other
pieces of evidence for human civilization in the Carboniferous age.
That’s no surprise when mankind needs no more than eight thousand
years to develop from a low-tech society to a high-tech society.

FIGURES AND THEIR EXPLANATIONS

Figure 1: Photo provided by Mr. Ed Conrad, who discovered and owned
this and other “fossils” shown in the albums. The author did not study
the CAT image or the white mask in the figure.
:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634732&p=1

ADDITIONAL FIGURES

Fig. 1-1: list some of the “rocks” Mr. Conrad sent to the author. The
rocks have all been proven to be fossils in the respective albums.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/lin440315

Figure 2: shows Thin Section 1 at
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634667&p=1

ADDITIONAL FIGURES
Fig. 2-1: shows Specimen 1 remnant URL:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634677&p=1

Fig. 2-2: shows Thin Section 2
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634704&p=11

Fig. 2-3: shows Thin Section 3. The thin section is made from small
grains that have gone loose from Specimen 1 during its transport by
post and handling by the author. Its URL is:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...34748.jpg&p=17

Figure 3: shows fossilized red blood cells. The photo also shows
fossilized dendrites of brain cells. Its URL is:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634728&p=0

Additional figures of fossilized red blood cells/blood vessels:

Figure 3-1: Fossilized red blood cells found in Thin Section 1.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634780&p=40

Figure 3-2: Coalified red blood cells found in remnant of Specimen 1.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634701&p=10

Figure 3-3: Fossilized red blood cells found in Thin Section 3.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...634723.jpg&p=0

Figure 3-4: shows fossilized blood vessels. URL:

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634777&p=38

Figure 3-5: shows many fossilized collagens in the microscopy by Mr.
Andrew MacRae.

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634687&p=1

Mr. MacRae used the microscopy to claim that Mr. Conrad’s fossils are
nothing but rocks.

This picture and Mr. MacRae’s article are also available at:

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t...carbbones.html
(Article URL)
http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t...6-001_ts3.jpeg
(Photo URL)

Fig. 3-6: shows fossilized collagen in another microscopy by Mr.
MacRae.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634688&p=2

The collagen was in a green circle drawn by Mr. MacRae himself. This
photo is also included in the above-mentioned article and available on
the Internet at:
http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t...7m_63x_xn.jpeg

Fig. 3-7: shows fossilized red blood cells in a microscopy by Mr. PZ
Myer.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634686&p=0

Mr. Myers used the above photo in his article to claim that Mr.
Conrad’s fossils are just rocks since they don’t contain Haversian
canals. The URL of the above-mentioned article and photo is:

http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/c..._circa_1 996/

Figure 4: Fossilized brain cell dendrites/red blood cells photographed
with 40x object lens.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634726&p=3

ADDITIONAL FIGURES

Fig.4-1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634715&p=0
shows a diagram in a Wikipedia article on Purkinje cells
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purkinje_cell). In the diagram’s bottom
left corner is a neuroglia cell with dendrites that resemble
fossilized dendrites of brain cells shown in Fig. 4, Fig. 4-2 , Fig.
4-3, Fig. 4-4.

Fig. 4-2: shows fossilized dendrites of brain cells photographed with
4x object lens.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634746&p=21

Fig. 4-3: shows above dendrites under 10x object lens
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634745&p=20

Fig. 4-4: shows part of above dendrites under 100X object lens.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634741&p=16

Fig. 4-5: shows axon terminal of a fossilized neuron.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634725&p=2

Fig. 4-6: features a fossilized soma of a brain cell.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634808&p=72

Fig. 4-7: features various kinds of neurons in human brain in

Web Page at URL
http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/gall1.html

Figure 5: shows skull cap of a Homo Erectus—the Java Man (Trinil 2,
Pithecanthropus I)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634722&p=0

This photo came from an on-line article at URL:
www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/java.html

Figure 6:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634678&p=2
Photo shows remnant of Specimen 1. The black area in the remnant is
featured in Fig. 2-1, Fig. 6-1 and Fig. 6-2.

Figure 6-1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634689&p=0
This photo features the black, coalified area in the remnant of
Specimen 1. Under LED light, the dark black color in Figure 6 turned
into colorful, shiny strings of blood vessels still containing
erythrocytes. This area is shiny black under naked eyes and
microscopes if viewed at a certain angle, such as in Fig.2-1
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...588634677&p=1).
This is a sign of vitrain found only in bituminous coal or anthracite.

Figure 6-2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1588634698&p=7
shows coalified erythrocytes and blood vessels. The dark black
coalified blood vessel (at center) still contains dark black coalified
erythrocytes.

Some big erythrocytes are below the center.

Figure 6-3:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...5&b=13&f=158++

Unfortuantely, the remainder of this report does not appear because of
space limitations to Web page's by the server in Taiwan.

==================

GEOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS
The Geological Society of America - http://www.geosociety.org/
American Geological Institute (AGI) - http://www.agiweb.org/
Society of Petroleum Engineers - http://www.spe.org/
International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) -
http://www.iugs.org/
NAGT - http://www.nagt.org/
National Association of Geology Teachers
CHRONOS - http://www.chronos.org/index.html
International Association for Mathematical Geology (IAMG) -
http://www.iamg.org/
Geologists' Association - http://www.geologist.demon.co.uk/
Society for Organic Petrology - http://www.tsop.org/index.html
Geological Society of Malaysia - http://www.gsm.org.my/
Calgary Mineral Exploration Group Society -
http://www.meg.calgary.ab.ca/
Irish Association of Economic Geology (IAEG) - http://www.iaeg.org/
Association of Engineering Geologists, Texas - (AEG-TX) -
http://www.aeg-tx.org/index.asp
Northwest Geological Society (NWGS) - http://www.scn.org/tech/nwgs/
East Tennessee Geological Society - http://www.discoveret.org/etgs/
leeds Geological Association -
http://www.leedsgeolassoc.freeserve.co.uk/
Buffalo Association of Professional Geologists, Inc. -
http://www.bapg.org/
Alabama Geological Society - http://homepage.mac.com/jpashin/AGS.htm
Geological Society of Nevada, Southern Chapter -
http://www.unlv.edu/Colleges/Science.../GSN/gsnsc.htm
East Texas Geological Society - http://www.easttexasgeo.com/
American Institute of Professional Geologists in Texas (AIPG-TX) -
http://www.aipg-tx.org
Essex Rock and Mineral Society - http://www.erms.org/
BCGS Black Country Geological Scociety - http://www.bcgs.info
Tooele Gem and Mineral Society -
http://www.utahrockhounds.com/tooelegem/
Oldham Geological Society - http://www.geocities.com/oldhamgeo/
Craven & Pendle Geological Society - http://www.kabrna.com/cpgs/
Yorkshire Geological Society - http://earth.leeds.ac.uk/ygs/index.htm
International Association for Obsidian Studies -
http://www.peak.org/obsidian/obsidian.html
Geological Association of Canada - http://www.esd.mun.ca/~gac/
GEOLOG, Geotext, and Palaeontographica Canadiana.
colorado Plateau Field Institute - http://www.cpfieldinstitute.org/
Ark-La-Tex Gem and Mineral Society -
http://www.geocities.com/arklatexgemandmineralclub/
Aberdeen Geological Society -
http://www.abdn.ac.uk/geology/ags/ags.htm
International Work Group on Geospatial Analysis of Glaciated
Environments - http://www.emporia.edu/earthsci/gage/gage.htm
Hull Geological Society -
http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfiel.../25/gsinfo.htm
UK society which publishes "Humberside Geologist."

In article ,
Ed Conrad wrote:


EVALUATION OF A "CARBONIFEROUS HUMAN CALVARIUM FOSSIL"

Kooks like this should only post in kooky news groups, not ones like
sci.math.

"Virgil" wrote in message
...

snip

Kooks like this should only post in kooky news groups, not ones like
sci.math.

They should have to pay us a premium to filter them out. Or better yet,
those who respond to them should pay the rest of us.

(removed all newsgroups except sci.astro.amateur)

George