A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein's Gravitational Waves May Set Speed Limit For Pulsar Spin



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 03, 08:24 PM
Ron Baalke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Einstein's Gravitational Waves May Set Speed Limit For Pulsar Spin

Nancy Neal
Headquarters, Washington July 2, 2003
(Phone: 202/358-1547)

Bill Steigerwald
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
(Phone: 301/286-5017)

RELEASE: 03-224

EINSTEIN'S GRAVITATIONAL WAVES MAY SET SPEED LIMIT FOR PULSAR
SPIN

Gravitational radiation, ripples in the fabric of space
predicted by Albert Einstein, may serve as a cosmic traffic
enforcer, protecting reckless pulsars from spinning too fast
and blowing apart, according to a report published in the
July 3 issue of Nature.

Pulsars, the fastest spinning stars in the Universe, are the
core remains of exploded stars, containing the mass of our
Sun compressed into a sphere about 10 miles across. Some
pulsars gain speed by pulling in gas from a neighboring star,
reaching spin rates of nearly one revolution per millisecond,
or almost 20 percent light speed. These "millisecond" pulsars
would fly apart if they gained much more speed.

Using NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, scientists have
found a limit to how fast a pulsar spins and speculate that
the cause is gravitational radiation: The faster a pulsar
spins, the more gravitational radiation it might release, as
its exquisite spherical shape becomes slightly deformed. This
may restrain the pulsar's rotation and save it from
obliteration.

"Nature has set a speed limit for pulsar spins," said Prof.
Deepto Chakrabarty of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, lead author on the journal
article. "Just like cars speeding on a highway, the fastest-
spinning pulsars could technically go twice as fast, but
something stops them before they break apart. It may be
gravitational radiation that prevents pulsars from destroying
themselves."

Chakrabarty's co-authors are Drs. Edward Morgan, Michael
Muno, and Duncan Galloway of MIT; Rudy Wijnands, University
of St. Andrews, Scotland; Michiel van der Klis, University of
Amsterdam; and Craig Markwardt, NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center, Greenbelt, Md. Wijnands also leads a second Nature
letter complementing this finding.

Gravitational waves, analogous to waves upon an ocean, are
ripples in four-dimensional spacetime. These exotic waves,
predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity, are produced by
massive objects in motion and have not yet been directly
detected.

Created in a star explosion, a pulsar is born spinning,
perhaps 30 times per second, and slows down over millions of
years. Yet if the dense pulsar, with its strong gravitational
potential, is in a binary system, it can pull in material
from its companion star. This influx can spin up the pulsar
to the millisecond range, rotating hundreds of times per
second.

In some pulsars, the accumulating material on the surface
occasionally is consumed in a massive thermonuclear
explosion, emitting a burst of X-ray light lasting only a few
seconds. In this fury lies a brief opportunity to measure the
spin of otherwise faint pulsars. Scientists report in Nature
that a type of flickering found in these X-ray bursts, called
"burst oscillations," serves as a direct measure of the
pulsars' spin rate. Studying the burst oscillations from 11
pulsars, they found none spinning faster than 619 times per
second.

The Rossi Explorer is capable of detecting pulsars spinning
as fast as 4,000 times per second. Pulsar breakup is
predicted to occur at 1,000 to 3,000 revolutions per second.
Yet scientists have found none that fast. From statistical
analysis of 11 pulsars, they concluded that the maximum speed
seen in nature must be below 760 revolutions per second.

This observation supports the theory of a feedback mechanism
involving gravitational radiation limiting pulsar speeds,
proposed by Prof. Lars Bildsten of the University of
California, Santa Barbara. As the pulsar picks up speed
through accretion, any slight distortion in the star's dense,
half-mile-thick crust of crystalline metal will allow the
pulsar to radiate gravitational waves. (Envision a spinning,
oblong rugby ball in water, which would cause more ripples
than a spinning, spherical basketball.) An equilibrium
rotation rate is eventually reached where the angular
momentum shed by emitting gravitational radiation matches the
angular momentum being added to the pulsar by its companion
star.

Bildsten said that accreting millisecond pulsars could
eventually be studied in greater detail in an entirely new
way, through the direct detection of their gravitational
radiation. LIGO, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory now in operation in Hanford, Wash. and in
Livingston, La., will eventually be tunable to the frequency
at which millisecond pulsars are expected to emit
gravitational waves.

"The waves are subtle, altering spacetime and the distance
between objects as far apart as the Earth and the Moon by
much less than the width of an atom," said Prof. Barry
Barish, LIGO director from the California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena. "As such, gravitational radiation has
not been directly detected yet. We hope to change that soon."
For animation, images and more information, visit the
Internet at:

http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/20...lsarspeed.html

-end-

  #2  
Old July 3rd 03, 08:49 AM
Robert Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Einstein's Gravitational Waves May Set Speed Limit For Pulsar Spin

(Ron Baalke) wrote in message ...
Nancy Neal
Headquarters, Washington July 2, 2003
(Phone: 202/358-1547)

Bill Steigerwald
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
(Phone: 301/286-5017)

RELEASE: 03-224

EINSTEIN'S GRAVITATIONAL WAVES MAY SET SPEED LIMIT FOR PULSAR
SPIN

Gravitational radiation, ripples in the fabric of space
predicted by Albert Einstein, may serve as a cosmic traffic
enforcer, protecting reckless pulsars from spinning too fast
and blowing apart, according to a report published in the
July 3 issue of Nature.

Pulsars, the fastest spinning stars in the Universe, are the
core remains of exploded stars, containing the mass of our
Sun compressed into a sphere about 10 miles across. Some
pulsars gain speed by pulling in gas from a neighboring star,
reaching spin rates of nearly one revolution per millisecond,
or almost 20 percent light speed. These "millisecond" pulsars
would fly apart if they gained much more speed.

...

http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/20...lsarspeed.html

Another possibility is that the generation of pulsar pulses requires
the existence of orbiting planets in a manner analogous to how Io
directs the production and period of EM radiation from Jupiter. Then
the origin of the limitation to the rate of pulsar pulses may be the
Roche limit for planets in orbit about the pulsar (close-in planets
have shorter orbital periods thus generating shorter periods for the
pulses):


================================================== =========================
================================================== =========================
From: Robert Clark )
Subject: 'Undead' star torpedoes current theories (Forwarded)
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics
Date: 1999/08/26

In article ,
wrote:

'Undead' star torpedoes current theories

Media Release: Wednesday, 25 August 1999 Ref 1999/190

Using CSIRO data a West Australian PhD student has found a star that is not
supposed to exist. His discovery is published in today's issue of the journal Nature.

Matthew Young of the University of Western Australia studies pulsars -- small
spinning stars which send out beams of radio waves. As a pulsar spins its beam
sweeps over the Earth and we see a radio 'blip'. By taking the pulsar's pulse
astronomers measure how fast the star is spinning.

The new pulsar, called PSR J2144-3933, spins only once every eight seconds.
"This is supposed to be way too slow," explains Mr Young.

"The theory says pulsars that spin slower than once every few seconds don't have
the energy to put out pulses -- their heartbeat stops and they die. This pulsar
is on the slab, so to speak, but its heart is still beating. By rights it should
be a corpse."

...
"For almost thirty years we've thought that pulsar beams are powered by an
exotic process that makes matter and anti-matter. The theory also says that this
pulsar spins too slowly for that process to occur -- that it shouldn't be
putting out radio waves. But it is."

There are a few things that could be wrong, he says.

"Perhaps the matter and anti-matter process is going on, but it can happen at
lower spin rates than we thought. Or perhaps the pulses are powered by something
else. Whatever the case, the theory needs a rethink."

Finding this pulsar implies that the pulsar population is a lot 'greyer' than
was thought.

"We found this pulsar only because it's relatively nearby -- about 600
light-years away," says Mr Young. "It has a small beam and a fairly weak signal.
This means there could be a lot more slow, old pulsars lurking out there
undetected. Our best guess is about 100 000 in the Galaxy -- as many as all the
other pulsars put together."


"As well, astronomers just love having these super-accurate clocks flying around
in space, because they can be used to work out all sorts of things about the
stars they orbit and even the space between the stars. One pulsar has been used
to show that gravity waves are real."
...



This reminds me of a idea I had for the origin of pulsar radio
waves. The
Earth is hit by bursts of decametric radio waves from the vicinity of
Jupiter
that are correlated with the position of Io in its orbit. See for
example:

Radio-Jupiter for Amateur Observers, By Jim Sky
http://web2.thesphere.com/SAS/bullet...1.html#Jupiter

PROJECT P5-2. JUPITER-IO MAGNETOSPHERE RADIO NOISE
http://www.elmag5.com/jupiter-io.htm

Two strong places where it occurs is when Io is at approx. 90 degrees
to the
Earth-Jupiter line.

Perhaps a similar effect is occurring in regard to pulsars in that
planets
are in orbit within the intense magnetic fields of the neutron star
generating the radio waves. This would be consistent with the fact
that the
signal was fairly weak for a slow period. This could mean the planet
generating the signal was further out with a lower orbital period and
in less
intense regions of the magnetic field generating a weaker radio
signal. Note
that there may still be radio bursts due to the pulsars rotation
itself. For
example, as discussed in the first web page above there are signals
correlated with Jupiters orbital rotation. If radio bursts associated
to an
orbiting body are a general effect then they should also exist in
regards to
Mercury and the Sun. They may be difficult to observe because of
Mercury's
distance from the Sun (being in a weaker magnetic field) and because
any such
signals are drowned out by the Sun's already intense radio emissions.
One
possibility would be to make the observations during an eclipse. If a
similar
process as with Io-Jupiter occurs, then there should be intensity
correlations to when Mercury is at 90 degrees to the Earth-Sun line.
Note
this is assuming that such radio emissions are actually emanating from
the
orbiting body itself. I don't know this to be the case. Is it known
for the
Io-Jupiter system? If it is found that there are such radio bursts
for the
Mercury-Sun system, then that opens up a possible avenue for searching
for
planets about nearby stars. It would involve searching for periodic
brightenings in a stars radio signal. Perhaps the Mercury-Sun system
produces
signals at a characteristic frequency as Io-Jupiter does at decametric
frequencies. We could look for these frequencies during such
brightenings.
For nearby stars, we could perhaps use the recent methods of
high-resolution
radio interferometry to distinguish the signal's origin as being from
the
star itself or from somewhere in orbit. For sun-like stars, we could
estimate
its mass and determine if a planet at this orbit should have an
orbital
period indicated by the periodic brightenings.


--
_______________________________________________

"In order for a scientific revolution to occur,
most scientists have to be wrong"
-- Bob Clark
_______________________________________________

================================================== =========================
================================================== =========================

From: Robert Clark )
Subject: 'Undead' star torpedoes current theories (Forwarded)
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics
Date: 1999/09/01

Thank you very much for your informative response, Dr. Arendt. My
general
sense is that the radio emissions from the Jovian system in toto are
so
complicated that they can emulate the features seen in pulsar radio
bursts
(aside from their intensity) including synchrotron radiation and
polarized
radio waves. I'm looking up some other relevant refs., but here's
one:

Ulysses Radio Observations of Jupiter
http://urap.gsfc.nasa.gov/WWW/reiner/jupiter.html

The question arises whether such emissions would exist if Jupiter
did not
have orbiting satellites. Again, my feeling is that they are directly
responsible for their complexity. Their intensity and variety would
not
nearly be as great if they weren't there. In particular there are the
intense
electron beams known to emanate from Io:

"Electron Beams and Ion Composition Measured at Io and in Its Torus",
Science, Volume 274, Number 5286 Issue of 18 Oct 1996, pp. 401 - 403
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten...t/274/5286/401

Such beams impacting the ionosphere of Jupiter have an effect on
Jupiter's
auroras. One imagines they also effect the radio emissions coming
directly
from Jupiter itself.

This proposed mechanism for the generation of pulsar radio bursts
would
have greater support if other cases of radio bursts directed by a
satellite
could be observed. I mentioned the possibility of Mercury, but there
may be
other cases. Recently there appeared a report that there could be
other
stable asteroid belts other than the one between Mars and Jupiter. As
I
recall one was very close in to the Sun, in fact inside the orbit of
Mercury.
If such radio bursts directed by satellites inside the magnetic fields
of a
parent body are a general phenomenon, they should also exist in this
case. As
with the case with Mercury, there would be the problem of
distinguishing
these bursts from the general radio emissions from the Sun. Again it
might
help to make such observations during an eclipse. There should be a
correlation between the period of such bursts and their origin's
distance
from the Sun as there is between the period and distance of a
satellite of
the Sun.


--
________________________________________________

"In order for a scientific revolution to occur,
most scientists have to be wrong"
-- Bob Clark
________________________________________________


In article ,
(Paul Arendt) wrote:
In article ,
Robert Clark wrote:
In article ,
wrote:
'Undead' star torpedoes current theories

Media Release: Wednesday, 25 August 1999 Ref 1999/190

Using CSIRO data a West Australian PhD student has found a star that is not
supposed to exist. His discovery is published in today's issue of the
journal Nature.

The new pulsar, called PSR J2144-3933, spins only once every eight seconds.
"This is supposed to be way too slow," explains Mr Young.


For the record, there are (at least) two distinct types of pulsars known:
"rotation-powered," which are typically seen in the radio, and whose spin
rate (usually) gradually and smoothly decreases with time. The newly
discovered pulsar sounds like it's in this class. Previously, the range
of known periods (for over 1,000 known pulsars) went from a few
milliseconds to about 4.5 seconds -- a factor of about 1,000. This new
object increases that range by another factor of two (almost).

There are *also* "accretion-powered" pulsars. These are objects whose
spin rate changes with time, often rapidly switching between speeding-up
and slowing-down. These latter objects are typically seen in the X-ray
regime, and typically have much longer periods. Eight seconds is a
*normal* period for these to have, but I think slower and faster objects
of this type are also known.

The difference is almost certainly that the accretion-powered stars have
a nearby companion which is shedding mass onto it (in an accretion disk),
and changes the angular momentum both up and down depending on exactly
how stuff falls onto the pulsar. The rotation-powered ones don't have
a (very) nearby mass-shedding companion, although the fastest
("millisecond") ones probably had one in the past.

"The theory says pulsars that spin slower than once every few seconds don't
have
the energy to put out pulses -- their heartbeat stops and they die. This
pulsar
is on the slab, so to speak, but its heart is still beating. By rights it
should
be a corpse."
...
"For almost thirty years we've thought that pulsar beams are powered by an
exotic process that makes matter and anti-matter. The theory also says
that this
pulsar spins too slowly for that process to occur -- that it shouldn't be
putting out radio waves. But it is."


Historically, the theory developed around the observations! So it's not
surprising that it says pulsars shouldn't be seen outside the known range:
people tried to explain *why* we didn't see any pulsars outside the
known range!

"Perhaps the matter and anti-matter process is going on, but it can
happen at
lower spin rates than we thought. Or perhaps the pulses are powered by
something
else. Whatever the case, the theory needs a rethink."


The theory is flexible enough to accomodate the new spin rate without too
much trouble, I'd bet. But the new issue of Nature hasn't shown up at
the library here yet, so I haven't seen the paper.

It would be much MORE of a "torpedo to current theories" to find a pulsar
at a spin rate a factor of two FASTER than the fastest known ones. In
fact, it would probably net the discoverer a Nobel Prize, as the first
direct evidence of a "quark star," in the most likely scenario. Searches
are underway to check for these fast-period objects, but it's tough to
see a periodic signal when you don't yet know what the period is (unless
it's very, very bright).

But it is neat that this was discovered -- anything outside of known
boundaries usually is!

This reminds me of a idea I had for the origin of pulsar radio waves. The
Earth is hit by bursts of decametric radio waves from the vicinity of Jupiter
that are correlated with the position of Io in its orbit.
...
Perhaps a similar effect is occurring in regard to pulsars in that planets
are in orbit within the intense magnetic fields of the neutron star
generating the radio waves. This would be consistent with the fact that the
signal was fairly weak for a slow period.


This isn't likely. For one, all the fast-period pulsars would be tough
to explain, since planets can't orbit the neutron star that fast! For
another, polarization data indicate that we're seeing emission from a
magnetic pole as the star spins past. It would be VERY tough to explain
the polarization data with a Jupiter-Io scenario.


================================================== =========================
================================================== =========================
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.