#1
|
|||
|
|||
Miscellaneous
New neighbors, a chainsaw, and light everywhe My new neighbors have decided that most everynight presents them with an opportunity to stand in their backyard while the lady drinks and smokes, not ten feet from where I put the telescope up in my yard, yet separated by an almost 6' high wood fence. At this corner of their house is a garage- access backdoor with two floodlights (equipped with motion detectors) directly above it. A couple of nights a week, she is joined by a few of her friends and their kids and/or husbands and on more than one occasion, I have heard the words "Jack Horkheimer," and "International Star Registry" floating over the fence and into my ears. Invariably, some unseen mouth on the other side of the fence will let it be known that the eyes above it frequently take in the Discovery Channel and Nova. Hmmm, I wonder. . .are they bringing this up for me to overhear or is it directed only at the small gathering at hand. I can be seen through the little 1/4" spaces between the wood slats which constitute the fence. They know I am there. It seems that the sensitivity of the motion detectors on these floodlights varies. When there is no one out in their yard and the only movement is mine, sometimes that motion is picked up and the lights go on and at other times there seems to be certain zones where I can move and not trigger the lights. Anyway, I always keep my head down and generally avoid viewing objects towards the zenith. The neighbors directly behind me, on the other side of the street and perhaps 150' south, have an unshielded streetlight directly in front of their home. Until about ten days ago, this presented no problem to me since there was a heavily foliaged tree on their property between me and the streetlight. Then I came home from work one day and found that big beautiful tree (it has to have been at least 100 years old) lying in pieces on the ground. Clearly, productive observing was history from my property. I had to find another spot that while, not perfect, was good enough and nearby. Mt. Pilchuck, Blue Mountain, and Lake Cassidy: I do like the Mt. Pilchuck location I use occasionally but it is an hour to get up there and is very isolated. Even though I have yet to be bothered, I still cringe when the sound of an approaching vehicle is heard in the distance. In the last month, near a campsite named "Verlot" at the bottom of the mountain, two sets of human remains were found and if I remember correctly, an autopsy revealed foul play was involved. Also, in the town of Granite Falls, maybe 14 miles from Mt. Pilchuck, a sailor from a naval installation on Puget Sound went for a hike and never came back. I don't think I will be going to Mt. Pilchuck alone again. A friend told me of a great observing site at the top of Blue Mountain outside of the small town named "Startup." With time on my hands (on vacation now), I got out my Washington Atlas & Gazatteer and located the site. I was ill-prepared for just how steep and rugged the "Blue Mountain Main Line" is. This is the last leg (maybe 3/4 of a mile) of the trip to the pinnacle. The very low clearance of my '94 Chevy Cavalier almost brought me to a stop a couple of times. Additionally, the road was so steep at this point that it just about overwhelmed the little family sedan's engine. I found myself thinking, "Oh my God, what will I do if I get stuck and can't even back out?" But. . .I made it to the top. Great view. The wind could be heard whipping through the mountains surrounding me. And, even though it was not really dark (maybe 9:15 p.m.), I could tell it would offer some terrific dark sky. But wait. What's this?? Shotgun shells all over the ground at my feet. I have seen the movie "Deliverance," so easing back down the "Blue Mountain Main Line," I realized I would not be going to observe from that location without four-wheel drive and a friend. Only about three miles to the north of Lake Stevens (where I live) is a much smaller and far less developed lake. . .Lake Cassidy. I drove up there a few days ago and checked it out. With no streetlights in view, few houses and none really nearby, a great panorama the sky, and a smooth dirt/gravel slope which is a boat launch and where I would also put the telescope, the spot seemed the answer to my dreams. So, I went there a couple of nights ago. As I was setting things up, guess what? Night fishermen decided to arrive and fish without a boat. . .from the boat launch. Right in front of me. With their car's headlights on to provide the illumination they felt they needed. I waited them out. They left before 11:00 p.m. By midnight, I had finished a starhopping jaunt to NGC7331 and neighboring Stephen's Quintet, as well as NGC185. I couldn't reel in 185's neighbor, NGC147. None of my bait worked. Not any focal length EP, or eyepatch over the unobserving eyeball, or tapping the tube. . ..I just couldn't catch this prize. So I went back again the next night - last night - to try again. This time the spot was populated upon my arrival with a man and his wife and child -- all sitting in chairs located in the back of ther pickup truck -- all fishing. They didn't have the truck's headlights on. No. They had a Coleman Lantern blazing away sitting up the roof of the truck. The man came over to me and turned out to quite nice. He asked if the light bothered me. I told him there were things I could observe which would not be affected by the light. While we were chatting about the safety of places to observe from, he told me that this wasn't the safest spot in the world. . .several of his friends had their locked vehicles vandalized in broad daylight as they (the vehicles) sat unattended in a parking area just across the road. Still, it seems to me that the spot is relatively secure for me. I think that a person who vandalizes cars seeks out an uninhabited location. The Lake Cassidy spot is where I will be doing my business from now on. PUSH-TO to the RES-CUE: In the face of that Coleman Lantern last night, I had to try for brighter objects. Neptune was up. I would try for that, yet it was located just over the southern horizon and right over that darn lantern which washed out my view of the stars in a zone of maybe 5 to 8 degrees extending in all directions from the Coleman product. My dobsonian is equipped with Magellan 1 digital setting circles, so I quickly did a two-star horizontal alignment using Enif and Deneb. The accuracy was 99 out of 100. . .good enough for me. Next came the real test of my Magellan 1. To locate planets, one must enter the day's date. The circles have a default date setting (which one changes to the present date) of "01/01/96." I wondered if Meade had made these digital setting circles Y2K (remember that term?) compliant. Entering 8/05/05, I was about to find out. Next I punched up "Neptune" and pushed the scope to the prescribed location which was JUST over the Coleman Lantern. Peering through the eyepiece, I was rewarded by small, beautiful blueish, orb. . .Neptune! It was almost centered directly in the FOV. Not bad considering the move to it from the alignment position was a considerable chunk of sky away. -- Martin R. Howell "Photographs From the Universe of Amateur Astronomy" http://members.isp.com/universeofama...nomy%40isp.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Martin R. Howell wrote:
New neighbors, a chainsaw, and light everywhe My new neighbors have decided that most everynight presents them with an opportunity to stand in their backyard while the lady drinks and smokes, not ten feet from where I put the telescope up in my yard, yet separated by Stories about annoying doofuses snipped I feel for you with the new neighbors and the cut down tree. Maybe the folks with the motion detectors will turn out nice, but I wouldn't count on it. And I also feel yer pain re. the lack of safe observing spots out in the local boonies. I never thought about it much till I got married and started breeding, but it seems more important now somehow that I don't go and get myself disappeared. I haven't tried this, but maybe you could find a kind rancher who wouldn't mind you parking on his land some nights. Worth a shot. Try not to murder your neighbors- Chris |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Wow! I marvel frequently at the trials and tribulations of so many of my
fellow Astronomy lovers. I read of temperatures so cold that ice forms on the lens. Distances so great that it takes hours of driving and lugging to find a so-so observing area. I for one feel blessed that I don't have to go through all of that. Oh, I do have my problems. We searched for several years to find our perfect house in a perfect area. One acre with wooded land on three sides and an Oak tree farm on the fourth. No street lights, dead end so no traffic. Only 5 or 6 houses with quiet old timers and NO dogs! That was 10 years ago. Now we have a horse breeding farm on the 5 acres in the back but there are trees blocking their lights. The lot on one side was cleared and there is a nice house going up but all their activity area such as the pool are on the other side away from me. He is a police detective who promised to take good care of us! The tree farm was sold to a landscaper who was nice enough to put shields on his outside lights. Across the street a new house is under construction but luckily they chose to position it at the far end away from my property. I bought a 10' x 12' Pvc yard shed from Home Depot and turned it into a slide off roof observatory. Works great and has room for two or three scopes. Helps to keep the mosquitos away and blocks the wind on those cold (60deg.) fort lauderdale nights! The moral of my story is, you need to move Martin! They are obviously ganging up on you because you are obviously an Alien trying to contact your home Planet! (I remember one guy that was reported to the police for having a missle in his yard. They thought he was a terrorist!) George Duke Davie, FL "Martin R. Howell" wrote in message .. . New neighbors, a chainsaw, and light everywhe My new neighbors have decided that most everynight presents them with an opportunity to stand in their backyard while the lady drinks and smokes, not ten feet from where I put the telescope up in my yard, yet separated by an almost 6' high wood fence. At this corner of their house is a garage- access backdoor with two floodlights (equipped with motion detectors) directly above it. A couple of nights a week, she is joined by a few of her friends and their kids and/or husbands and on more than one occasion, I have heard the words "Jack Horkheimer," and "International Star Registry" floating over the fence and into my ears. Invariably, some unseen mouth on the other side of the fence will let it be known that the eyes above it frequently take in the Discovery Channel and Nova. Hmmm, I wonder. . .are they bringing this up for me to overhear or is it directed only at the small gathering at hand. I can be seen through the little 1/4" spaces between the wood slats which constitute the fence. They know I am there. It seems that the sensitivity of the motion detectors on these floodlights varies. When there is no one out in their yard and the only movement is mine, sometimes that motion is picked up and the lights go on and at other times there seems to be certain zones where I can move and not trigger the lights. Anyway, I always keep my head down and generally avoid viewing objects towards the zenith. The neighbors directly behind me, on the other side of the street and perhaps 150' south, have an unshielded streetlight directly in front of their home. Until about ten days ago, this presented no problem to me since there was a heavily foliaged tree on their property between me and the streetlight. Then I came home from work one day and found that big beautiful tree (it has to have been at least 100 years old) lying in pieces on the ground. Clearly, productive observing was history from my property. I had to find another spot that while, not perfect, was good enough and nearby. Mt. Pilchuck, Blue Mountain, and Lake Cassidy: I do like the Mt. Pilchuck location I use occasionally but it is an hour to get up there and is very isolated. Even though I have yet to be bothered, I still cringe when the sound of an approaching vehicle is heard in the distance. In the last month, near a campsite named "Verlot" at the bottom of the mountain, two sets of human remains were found and if I remember correctly, an autopsy revealed foul play was involved. Also, in the town of Granite Falls, maybe 14 miles from Mt. Pilchuck, a sailor from a naval installation on Puget Sound went for a hike and never came back. I don't think I will be going to Mt. Pilchuck alone again. A friend told me of a great observing site at the top of Blue Mountain outside of the small town named "Startup." With time on my hands (on vacation now), I got out my Washington Atlas & Gazatteer and located the site. I was ill-prepared for just how steep and rugged the "Blue Mountain Main Line" is. This is the last leg (maybe 3/4 of a mile) of the trip to the pinnacle. The very low clearance of my '94 Chevy Cavalier almost brought me to a stop a couple of times. Additionally, the road was so steep at this point that it just about overwhelmed the little family sedan's engine. I found myself thinking, "Oh my God, what will I do if I get stuck and can't even back out?" But. . .I made it to the top. Great view. The wind could be heard whipping through the mountains surrounding me. And, even though it was not really dark (maybe 9:15 p.m.), I could tell it would offer some terrific dark sky. But wait. What's this?? Shotgun shells all over the ground at my feet. I have seen the movie "Deliverance," so easing back down the "Blue Mountain Main Line," I realized I would not be going to observe from that location without four-wheel drive and a friend. Only about three miles to the north of Lake Stevens (where I live) is a much smaller and far less developed lake. . .Lake Cassidy. I drove up there a few days ago and checked it out. With no streetlights in view, few houses and none really nearby, a great panorama the sky, and a smooth dirt/gravel slope which is a boat launch and where I would also put the telescope, the spot seemed the answer to my dreams. So, I went there a couple of nights ago. As I was setting things up, guess what? Night fishermen decided to arrive and fish without a boat. . .from the boat launch. Right in front of me. With their car's headlights on to provide the illumination they felt they needed. I waited them out. They left before 11:00 p.m. By midnight, I had finished a starhopping jaunt to NGC7331 and neighboring Stephen's Quintet, as well as NGC185. I couldn't reel in 185's neighbor, NGC147. None of my bait worked. Not any focal length EP, or eyepatch over the unobserving eyeball, or tapping the tube. .. .I just couldn't catch this prize. So I went back again the next night - last night - to try again. This time the spot was populated upon my arrival with a man and his wife and child -- all sitting in chairs located in the back of ther pickup truck -- all fishing. They didn't have the truck's headlights on. No. They had a Coleman Lantern blazing away sitting up the roof of the truck. The man came over to me and turned out to quite nice. He asked if the light bothered me. I told him there were things I could observe which would not be affected by the light. While we were chatting about the safety of places to observe from, he told me that this wasn't the safest spot in the world. . .several of his friends had their locked vehicles vandalized in broad daylight as they (the vehicles) sat unattended in a parking area just across the road. Still, it seems to me that the spot is relatively secure for me. I think that a person who vandalizes cars seeks out an uninhabited location. The Lake Cassidy spot is where I will be doing my business from now on. PUSH-TO to the RES-CUE: In the face of that Coleman Lantern last night, I had to try for brighter objects. Neptune was up. I would try for that, yet it was located just over the southern horizon and right over that darn lantern which washed out my view of the stars in a zone of maybe 5 to 8 degrees extending in all directions from the Coleman product. My dobsonian is equipped with Magellan 1 digital setting circles, so I quickly did a two-star horizontal alignment using Enif and Deneb. The accuracy was 99 out of 100. . .good enough for me. Next came the real test of my Magellan 1. To locate planets, one must enter the day's date. The circles have a default date setting (which one changes to the present date) of "01/01/96." I wondered if Meade had made these digital setting circles Y2K (remember that term?) compliant. Entering 8/05/05, I was about to find out. Next I punched up "Neptune" and pushed the scope to the prescribed location which was JUST over the Coleman Lantern. Peering through the eyepiece, I was rewarded by small, beautiful blueish, orb. . .Neptune! It was almost centered directly in the FOV. Not bad considering the move to it from the alignment position was a considerable chunk of sky away. -- Martin R. Howell "Photographs From the Universe of Amateur Astronomy" http://members.isp.com/universeofama...nomy%40isp.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Martin R. Howell wrote:
New neighbors, a chainsaw, and light everywhe My new neighbors have decided that most everynight presents them with an opportunity to stand in their backyard while the lady drinks and smokes, not ten feet from where I put the telescope up in my yard, yet separated by an almost 6' high wood fence. At this corner of their house is a garage- access backdoor with two floodlights (equipped with motion detectors) directly above it. A couple of nights a week, she is joined by a few of her friends and their kids and/or husbands and on more than one occasion, I have heard the words "Jack Horkheimer," and "International Star Registry" floating over the fence and into my ears. Invariably, some unseen mouth on the other side of the fence will let it be known that the eyes above it frequently take in the Discovery Channel and Nova. Hmmm, I wonder. . .are they bringing this up for me to overhear or is it directed only at the small gathering at hand. I can be seen through the little 1/4" spaces between the wood slats which constitute the fence. They know I am there. It seems that the sensitivity of the motion detectors on these floodlights varies. When there is no one out in their yard and the only movement is mine, sometimes that motion is picked up and the lights go on and at other times there seems to be certain zones where I can move and not trigger the lights. Anyway, I always keep my head down and generally avoid viewing objects towards the zenith. The neighbors directly behind me, on the other side of the street and perhaps 150' south, have an unshielded streetlight directly in front of their home. Until about ten days ago, this presented no problem to me since there was a heavily foliaged tree on their property between me and the streetlight. Then I came home from work one day and found that big beautiful tree (it has to have been at least 100 years old) lying in pieces on the ground. Clearly, productive observing was history from my property. I had to find another spot that while, not perfect, was good enough and nearby. Martin: Life has handed you a lemon, so why not make lemonade? You're going to have to live with the neighbors during the daytime also, and there may be more issues besides astronomy. Why not invite them over for a night or two of observing? It sounds like they're dropping hints already. It'll get things off to a good start, and give you the opportunity to explain the value of sensible lighting. Their movement will trigger the yard lights and provide a graphic illustration. As for the tree betwen you and the streetlight, I'm doubly offended, since I'm a woodworker as well as an astronomer. Bob Schmall |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Martin R. Howell" wrote in message .. . New neighbors, a chainsaw, and light everywhe Good luck with the neighbors..eh. Too bad our neighbors to the south are a lot like the ones you lament about. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Martin, I could be wrong, but I do believe it is you they are referring
to as "Jack Horkenheimer". Thqy probably think you're a big joke, and honestly, the majority of people out there probably think a person is odd/weird who stands at a telescope eyepiece in utter silence in the middle of the night, while other people they figure are doing more "Normal Things", like tipping a few cans of Bud Lite, hitting up on a few Doobs, etc etc. Oh sure they're spying on you through the cracks. They know you're back there, so they have to perhaps be a little more "extra careful" what they say outloud, and what activities they partake in (see above). Unfortunately, tens of thousands of us put up with pretty much the same more, or less. I had just wonderful nieghbors here myself not long ago, but fortunately they moved. I'm just praying I don't get more of the same here anytime soon. How about "Tampoline Basketball" around the clock. That was their kids favorite game. Didn't matter of it was 105 out, the hotter, the better. From 10am till 11:30pm every day. Thier little "Basketball Court" wasn't 20 feet from my bedroom. Every time I'd hear the ball start to bouce, I'd usually start singing a few bars of Cheech+Chong's "Basketball Jones". How about coming, and going all hours of the night, and pulling up in their driveway with a 500 watt car audio system blasting out that do-rag **** playing Boom-Boom-Boom at 1:30am in the morning. Loud enough that my ****ing bed is literally vibrating. A continuous clean up of their nasty garbage scattered all over the alley every day next to my driveway, as they must've been freaking "Helen Keller", and couldn't find the Garbage Can. It all eventually came to a head when their kids decided to vandalize my property. That was when I unfortunately had to revert back to my earlier Chicago youth, and told them one more ****ing time, and someone's gonna be makin a trip to the hospital. As another poster suggested, I would Not invite them over for any viewing of any sort, especially if you have quite expensive equipment. While those neighbors of mine lived across the way, I was always reluctant to let them see any of my valuable extra-curricular possessions for fear of theft when I wasn't home. If they maybe perhaps approach you in the future in a respectable way, and show a sincere interest in viewng with you, then "maybe" I'd consider inviting them, otherwise don't try forcing, or suggesting "your" religion upon them. Sorry to perhaps give off a sense of paranoia, but there are all kinds in this world, don't never be so sure that you think you 'know' your neighbors. Mark |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry to perhaps give off a sense of paranoia, but there are all kinds in this world, don't never be so sure that you think you 'know' your neighbors. Mark HA..'In Canada" my neebors are just fine with me and my telescope. Tonight was great. I showed our CT visiting friend the wonders of binary stars with no interfering lights at all under Mag 5.5 skies from the backyard. The Cygnus was flying high. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pretty much anything goes where I live.... lights, squirrels, possums, cats
and people. People are the most interesting while I'm out at the scope. Last year, a couple a football field or so away made love so loudly that I could hear them in the wintertime with their windows closed. Now that's some loving! There is a couple with three grown boys right behind me. They have a hot tub in the backyard about 50 feet or so away from where I observe. The only thing separating me from them is a fence row of bushes. I have heard quite a lot of rumbling around when the boys bring the girls by late at night. The fact is that they know I'm out there, as I sometimes startle the new girls if I move about the yard, but they keep right on fu**ing. I guess after I told them I didn't care what went on, they took it literally. We have a bunch of wild cats roaming about the neighborhood all night long. As with the people, they are often heard, sometimes in large numbers, either fighting or mating. They don't quite know what to make of me when I'm observing. They sort of stop and stare, probably wishing to themselves that I would just go inside. Not a chance and sometimes I will hiss at them. During the Mars opposition of '03, when I was out observing nearly every clear night that summer, I often heard some rustling in the bushes, usually between 1-2 AM. For a long time, I thought it was the neighbor's dog until one night the rustling got very close to me. It seemed to come through the fence and was about 5 feet or so away from where I was sitting. So, I switched the light from the red night vision setting back to white and shined the light toward the bushes. To my surprise, "mom" possum was starting back at me, complete with her young. She froze while the light was on her and I realized no harm was intended, so I turned it off. For the rest of the summer, "mom" would regularly go through the bushes around the same time and had no problems getting quite close to me. Pretty brave possum! Of course, most of us have lights, and I too have my fair share. The biggest problem was going to be some neighbor's flood lights, positioned not towards the ground but higher up into the air. At the time, I wasn't sure whether or not the glare basically enveloping my backyard was going to be a detriment to Mars observing. Since I hardly ever saw these particular neighbors outside, I sent them a polite letter asking them to turn their spotlights toward the ground. Within 3 days they did and I was overjoyed. Of course, as I found out later, whether extra light is around or not doesn't effect planetary observation, unless the light is shining directly into the scope. However, since the general lighting around town has increased significantly over the last 15 years, my DSO days are over. Where I could see the milky way 15 years ago quite well, I can just barely make it out these days. Sad when light pollution slowly takes over. Well, that's my story. I've never had to move to a remote observing location for any reason and hope I never have to. However, if things continue to decline, I may be forced to one of these days. Dan Garrett "Martin R. Howell" wrote in message .. . New neighbors, a chainsaw, and light everywhe My new neighbors have decided that most everynight presents them with an opportunity to stand in their backyard while the lady drinks and smokes, not ten feet from where I put the telescope up in my yard, yet separated by an almost 6' high wood fence. At this corner of their house is a garage- access backdoor with two floodlights (equipped with motion detectors) directly above it. A couple of nights a week, she is joined by a few of her friends and their kids and/or husbands and on more than one occasion, I have heard the words "Jack Horkheimer," and "International Star Registry" floating over the fence and into my ears. Invariably, some unseen mouth on the other side of the fence will let it be known that the eyes above it frequently take in the Discovery Channel and Nova. Hmmm, I wonder. . .are they bringing this up for me to overhear or is it directed only at the small gathering at hand. I can be seen through the little 1/4" spaces between the wood slats which constitute the fence. They know I am there. It seems that the sensitivity of the motion detectors on these floodlights varies. When there is no one out in their yard and the only movement is mine, sometimes that motion is picked up and the lights go on and at other times there seems to be certain zones where I can move and not trigger the lights. Anyway, I always keep my head down and generally avoid viewing objects towards the zenith. The neighbors directly behind me, on the other side of the street and perhaps 150' south, have an unshielded streetlight directly in front of their home. Until about ten days ago, this presented no problem to me since there was a heavily foliaged tree on their property between me and the streetlight. Then I came home from work one day and found that big beautiful tree (it has to have been at least 100 years old) lying in pieces on the ground. Clearly, productive observing was history from my property. I had to find another spot that while, not perfect, was good enough and nearby. Mt. Pilchuck, Blue Mountain, and Lake Cassidy: I do like the Mt. Pilchuck location I use occasionally but it is an hour to get up there and is very isolated. Even though I have yet to be bothered, I still cringe when the sound of an approaching vehicle is heard in the distance. In the last month, near a campsite named "Verlot" at the bottom of the mountain, two sets of human remains were found and if I remember correctly, an autopsy revealed foul play was involved. Also, in the town of Granite Falls, maybe 14 miles from Mt. Pilchuck, a sailor from a naval installation on Puget Sound went for a hike and never came back. I don't think I will be going to Mt. Pilchuck alone again. A friend told me of a great observing site at the top of Blue Mountain outside of the small town named "Startup." With time on my hands (on vacation now), I got out my Washington Atlas & Gazatteer and located the site. I was ill-prepared for just how steep and rugged the "Blue Mountain Main Line" is. This is the last leg (maybe 3/4 of a mile) of the trip to the pinnacle. The very low clearance of my '94 Chevy Cavalier almost brought me to a stop a couple of times. Additionally, the road was so steep at this point that it just about overwhelmed the little family sedan's engine. I found myself thinking, "Oh my God, what will I do if I get stuck and can't even back out?" But. . .I made it to the top. Great view. The wind could be heard whipping through the mountains surrounding me. And, even though it was not really dark (maybe 9:15 p.m.), I could tell it would offer some terrific dark sky. But wait. What's this?? Shotgun shells all over the ground at my feet. I have seen the movie "Deliverance," so easing back down the "Blue Mountain Main Line," I realized I would not be going to observe from that location without four-wheel drive and a friend. Only about three miles to the north of Lake Stevens (where I live) is a much smaller and far less developed lake. . .Lake Cassidy. I drove up there a few days ago and checked it out. With no streetlights in view, few houses and none really nearby, a great panorama the sky, and a smooth dirt/gravel slope which is a boat launch and where I would also put the telescope, the spot seemed the answer to my dreams. So, I went there a couple of nights ago. As I was setting things up, guess what? Night fishermen decided to arrive and fish without a boat. . .from the boat launch. Right in front of me. With their car's headlights on to provide the illumination they felt they needed. I waited them out. They left before 11:00 p.m. By midnight, I had finished a starhopping jaunt to NGC7331 and neighboring Stephen's Quintet, as well as NGC185. I couldn't reel in 185's neighbor, NGC147. None of my bait worked. Not any focal length EP, or eyepatch over the unobserving eyeball, or tapping the tube. .. .I just couldn't catch this prize. So I went back again the next night - last night - to try again. This time the spot was populated upon my arrival with a man and his wife and child -- all sitting in chairs located in the back of ther pickup truck -- all fishing. They didn't have the truck's headlights on. No. They had a Coleman Lantern blazing away sitting up the roof of the truck. The man came over to me and turned out to quite nice. He asked if the light bothered me. I told him there were things I could observe which would not be affected by the light. While we were chatting about the safety of places to observe from, he told me that this wasn't the safest spot in the world. . .several of his friends had their locked vehicles vandalized in broad daylight as they (the vehicles) sat unattended in a parking area just across the road. Still, it seems to me that the spot is relatively secure for me. I think that a person who vandalizes cars seeks out an uninhabited location. The Lake Cassidy spot is where I will be doing my business from now on. PUSH-TO to the RES-CUE: In the face of that Coleman Lantern last night, I had to try for brighter objects. Neptune was up. I would try for that, yet it was located just over the southern horizon and right over that darn lantern which washed out my view of the stars in a zone of maybe 5 to 8 degrees extending in all directions from the Coleman product. My dobsonian is equipped with Magellan 1 digital setting circles, so I quickly did a two-star horizontal alignment using Enif and Deneb. The accuracy was 99 out of 100. . .good enough for me. Next came the real test of my Magellan 1. To locate planets, one must enter the day's date. The circles have a default date setting (which one changes to the present date) of "01/01/96." I wondered if Meade had made these digital setting circles Y2K (remember that term?) compliant. Entering 8/05/05, I was about to find out. Next I punched up "Neptune" and pushed the scope to the prescribed location which was JUST over the Coleman Lantern. Peering through the eyepiece, I was rewarded by small, beautiful blueish, orb. . .Neptune! It was almost centered directly in the FOV. Not bad considering the move to it from the alignment position was a considerable chunk of sky away. -- Martin R. Howell "Photographs From the Universe of Amateur Astronomy" http://members.isp.com/universeofama...nomy%40isp.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Civilisation! Get a mean dog!
"Martin R. Howell" wrote: New neighbors, a chainsaw, and light everywhe My new neighbors have decided that most everynight presents them with an opportunity to stand in their backyard while the lady drinks and smokes, not ten feet from where I put the telescope up in my yard, yet separated by an almost 6' high wood fence. At this corner of their house is a garage- access backdoor with two floodlights (equipped with motion detectors) directly above it. A couple of nights a week, she is joined by a few of her friends and their kids and/or husbands and on more than one occasion, I have heard the words "Jack Horkheimer," and "International Star Registry" floating over the fence and into my ears. Invariably, some unseen mouth on the other side of the fence will let it be known that the eyes above it frequently take in the Discovery Channel and Nova. Hmmm, I wonder. . .are they bringing this up for me to overhear or is it directed only at the small gathering at hand. I can be seen through the little 1/4" spaces between the wood slats which constitute the fence. They know I am there. It seems that the sensitivity of the motion detectors on these floodlights varies. When there is no one out in their yard and the only movement is mine, sometimes that motion is picked up and the lights go on and at other times there seems to be certain zones where I can move and not trigger the lights. Anyway, I always keep my head down and generally avoid viewing objects towards the zenith. The neighbors directly behind me, on the other side of the street and perhaps 150' south, have an unshielded streetlight directly in front of their home. Until about ten days ago, this presented no problem to me since there was a heavily foliaged tree on their property between me and the streetlight. Then I came home from work one day and found that big beautiful tree (it has to have been at least 100 years old) lying in pieces on the ground. Clearly, productive observing was history from my property. I had to find another spot that while, not perfect, was good enough and nearby. Mt. Pilchuck, Blue Mountain, and Lake Cassidy: I do like the Mt. Pilchuck location I use occasionally but it is an hour to get up there and is very isolated. Even though I have yet to be bothered, I still cringe when the sound of an approaching vehicle is heard in the distance. In the last month, near a campsite named "Verlot" at the bottom of the mountain, two sets of human remains were found and if I remember correctly, an autopsy revealed foul play was involved. Also, in the town of Granite Falls, maybe 14 miles from Mt. Pilchuck, a sailor from a naval installation on Puget Sound went for a hike and never came back. I don't think I will be going to Mt. Pilchuck alone again. A friend told me of a great observing site at the top of Blue Mountain outside of the small town named "Startup." With time on my hands (on vacation now), I got out my Washington Atlas & Gazatteer and located the site. I was ill-prepared for just how steep and rugged the "Blue Mountain Main Line" is. This is the last leg (maybe 3/4 of a mile) of the trip to the pinnacle. The very low clearance of my '94 Chevy Cavalier almost brought me to a stop a couple of times. Additionally, the road was so steep at this point that it just about overwhelmed the little family sedan's engine. I found myself thinking, "Oh my God, what will I do if I get stuck and can't even back out?" But. . .I made it to the top. Great view. The wind could be heard whipping through the mountains surrounding me. And, even though it was not really dark (maybe 9:15 p.m.), I could tell it would offer some terrific dark sky. But wait. What's this?? Shotgun shells all over the ground at my feet. I have seen the movie "Deliverance," so easing back down the "Blue Mountain Main Line," I realized I would not be going to observe from that location without four-wheel drive and a friend. Only about three miles to the north of Lake Stevens (where I live) is a much smaller and far less developed lake. . .Lake Cassidy. I drove up there a few days ago and checked it out. With no streetlights in view, few houses and none really nearby, a great panorama the sky, and a smooth dirt/gravel slope which is a boat launch and where I would also put the telescope, the spot seemed the answer to my dreams. So, I went there a couple of nights ago. As I was setting things up, guess what? Night fishermen decided to arrive and fish without a boat. . .from the boat launch. Right in front of me. With their car's headlights on to provide the illumination they felt they needed. I waited them out. They left before 11:00 p.m. By midnight, I had finished a starhopping jaunt to NGC7331 and neighboring Stephen's Quintet, as well as NGC185. I couldn't reel in 185's neighbor, NGC147. None of my bait worked. Not any focal length EP, or eyepatch over the unobserving eyeball, or tapping the tube. . .I just couldn't catch this prize. So I went back again the next night - last night - to try again. This time the spot was populated upon my arrival with a man and his wife and child -- all sitting in chairs located in the back of ther pickup truck -- all fishing. They didn't have the truck's headlights on. No. They had a Coleman Lantern blazing away sitting up the roof of the truck. The man came over to me and turned out to quite nice. He asked if the light bothered me. I told him there were things I could observe which would not be affected by the light. While we were chatting about the safety of places to observe from, he told me that this wasn't the safest spot in the world. . .several of his friends had their locked vehicles vandalized in broad daylight as they (the vehicles) sat unattended in a parking area just across the road. Still, it seems to me that the spot is relatively secure for me. I think that a person who vandalizes cars seeks out an uninhabited location. The Lake Cassidy spot is where I will be doing my business from now on. PUSH-TO to the RES-CUE: In the face of that Coleman Lantern last night, I had to try for brighter objects. Neptune was up. I would try for that, yet it was located just over the southern horizon and right over that darn lantern which washed out my view of the stars in a zone of maybe 5 to 8 degrees extending in all directions from the Coleman product. My dobsonian is equipped with Magellan 1 digital setting circles, so I quickly did a two-star horizontal alignment using Enif and Deneb. The accuracy was 99 out of 100. . .good enough for me. Next came the real test of my Magellan 1. To locate planets, one must enter the day's date. The circles have a default date setting (which one changes to the present date) of "01/01/96." I wondered if Meade had made these digital setting circles Y2K (remember that term?) compliant. Entering 8/05/05, I was about to find out. Next I punched up "Neptune" and pushed the scope to the prescribed location which was JUST over the Coleman Lantern. Peering through the eyepiece, I was rewarded by small, beautiful blueish, orb. . .Neptune! It was almost centered directly in the FOV. Not bad considering the move to it from the alignment position was a considerable chunk of sky away. -- Martin R. Howell "Photographs From the Universe of Amateur Astronomy" http://members.isp.com/universeofama...nomy%40isp.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|