|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
G.T. wrote:
Anybody take a look at this book yet? http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/astro.../colophon.html I took a very brief look at this in the bookstore. It's not a bad book. Some of the hacks are very simple, almost trivial things that you can find in any introductory book, but others are found only in secondary books. If you're still early on in your astronomy book acquisition, it might be worthwhile. If people are still interested, I'll take a longer look at it... -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What are these sort of 'hacks' in astronomy? I don't think I understand
fully Thank you. "Brian Tung" wrote in message ... G.T. wrote: Anybody take a look at this book yet? http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/astro.../colophon.html I took a very brief look at this in the bookstore. It's not a bad book. Some of the hacks are very simple, almost trivial things that you can find in any introductory book, but others are found only in secondary books. If you're still early on in your astronomy book acquisition, it might be worthwhile. If people are still interested, I'll take a longer look at it... -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Brian Tung" wrote in message ... G.T. wrote: Anybody take a look at this book yet? http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/astro.../colophon.html I took a very brief look at this in the bookstore. It's not a bad book. Some of the hacks are very simple, almost trivial things that you can find in any introductory book, but others are found only in secondary books. If you're still early on in your astronomy book acquisition, it might be worthwhile. If people are still interested, I'll take a longer look at it... I think I may pick it up since I'm very early in my book acquisition. Greg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Zarkovic" wrote in message news:mP%De.10725$s54.293@pd7tw2no... What are these sort of 'hacks' in astronomy? I don't think I understand fully Thank you. I think that the "hack" part is a bit gimmicky but from reading the reviews it sounds like it may be helpful to me. Greg "Brian Tung" wrote in message ... G.T. wrote: Anybody take a look at this book yet? http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/astro.../colophon.html I took a very brief look at this in the bookstore. It's not a bad book. Some of the hacks are very simple, almost trivial things that you can find in any introductory book, but others are found only in secondary books. If you're still early on in your astronomy book acquisition, it might be worthwhile. If people are still interested, I'll take a longer look at it... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Zarkovic wrote:
What are these sort of 'hacks' in astronomy? I don't think I understand fully Thank you. Oh yes, I forgot about that. A hack, in this context, is a quick way to do something. For example, a polar alignment hack on my C5+ is to set the thing up so that it's roughly level, and have the handle point toward the pole star. That's good enough for visual. This is the origin, by the way, of the term "hacker" as it is applied to computers. A hack is a quick, clever, and not necessarily inelegant way to do a certain task--with the emphasis on clever. The task, contrary to the popular sense of the word, need not be destructive in any way. I might come up with a hack that uses sed and awk (two Unix programs) to automatically insert MP3 tags into all of my audio files. With the advent of nominal security in computer systems, it did take some cleverness to break into them, and I suspect that, along with the sense of hack, "to cut down," conspired to give the term its current negative connotations. In any case, the book explicitly mentions the original sense of "hack," and one of its objectives is to "reclaim" the term, as the authors put it. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"G.T." wrote in message ...
Anybody take a look at this book yet? http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/astro.../colophon.html There are 11 reviews on Amazon.com. All are favorable 4 to 5 stars. -- Hilton Evans ----------------------------------------------- ChemPen Chemical Structure Software http://www.chempensoftware.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Tung wrote:
In any case, the book explicitly mentions the original sense of "hack," and one of its objectives is to "reclaim" the term, as the authors put it. Reclaim? It was never lost. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker Even if it was (somehow) lost, why 'reclaim' it from a bunch of demonstrably ignorant boobs? (e.g., the media, 'social science' researchers, the government and its lackey's, etc) Far, far, better to let them make fools of themselves while we hackers laugh ourselves silly. Levy's "Hackers" is still, 20 years later, the definitive, timeless work on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackers...ter_Revolution Given the subversive nature of the 'hacker ethic' we can perhaps see why the Leviathan wish to dimiss members of The Chosen as criminals and terrorists. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I (Brian Tung) wrote:
In any case, the book explicitly mentions the original sense of "hack," and one of its objectives is to "reclaim" the term, as the authors put it. e--------- wrote: Reclaim? It was never lost. You're right that it was never completely lost. In the popular conception, though, it is dominated by the "computer attacker" sense. Many people, through no fault of their own, have never even heard of the earlier sense; they think it *only* means "attacker." Even if it was (somehow) lost, why 'reclaim' it from a bunch of demonstrably ignorant boobs? (e.g., the media, 'social science' researchers, the government and its lackey's, etc) Far, far, better to let them make fools of themselves while we hackers laugh ourselves silly. That's a value judgment--one I don't agree with, personally. I think it's a shame that more people haven't heard of the older sense, and I have no desire to see it used as a shibboleth. (After all, the sense prevalent nowadays is not really a foolish use of the term--just not the one I learned first, is all.) -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOMINATION: digest, volume 2453397 | Ross | Astronomy Misc | 233 | October 23rd 05 04:24 AM |
kookdancers digest | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 43 | July 25th 05 10:20 PM |
Robert Foot's mirror matter hypothesis relevant to dark accelerators? Murray 2003.03.30 | Rich Murray | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 31st 05 10:50 AM |
Robert Foot's mirror matter hypothesis relevant to dark accelerators? Murray 2003.03.30 | Rich Murray | UK Astronomy | 1 | March 31st 05 10:50 AM |
FREE ASTRONOMY SYMPOSIUM - Oct. 9, 2004 | KC | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 24th 04 03:39 PM |