#1
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
Any celestial event that is assigned a 'meaning' (beyond physics) is
within the realm of ancient astrology. Astronomy is 'observation' and astrology is 'interpretation'. To date, all of the astronomical theories and possibilities have been thoroughly investigated. All of the astronomical theories are mundane, however, all astronomical commentators have done a superb investigatory job probing the window of time (7 BC to 4 BC) and coming up with possible 'Star of Bethlehem' candidates. At the time of the birth of Christ astrology and astronomy were the same 'science'. In fact, the only reason that celestial events and objects were studied was to try to ascertain what 'meaning' was to be derived from the observed phenomena. Christ, according to the New Testament, was born before King Herod died. Herod's death is a matter of historical account and it occured in April of 4 BC ( 3 B.C.E. because of no year "0" ). Additionally, NO ONE but the Magi 'saw' the star. Also, the 'star that rises in the east' is (also) the Sun. I mention this because there is a great deal of astrological/astronomical allegory incorporated into The New Testament account of Christ's birth. For Instance, 'a star that stopped over a house where the child and his mother were'. The star that 'stops' is the sun at a solstice point (solstice means 'sun stationary') and a 'house' is a component of an ancient (and contemporary) astrological chart. The 'house' of the mother is the astrological 4th house which begins at the time of the summer solstice. Some evidence is now forming which indicates a possible astronomical/astrological allegory. The Old Testament states that the Messiah/King will be born in Bethlehem (Hebrew for 'house of bread'). Bread, in astrology is related to the astrological sign of Virgo (The Virgin). There is further writing in the Old Testament about a 'star' (asterism, which may be plural (also) for a collection of or constellation) linked to the birth of the Messiah/King. The Persian Magi were highly advanced astronomer/astrologers. By 'highly advanced' I mean being possessed of the knowledge of the entire solar system as it is encoded in mathematic symbols in the construction of The Great Pyramid at Giza (2800 BC). See, http://www.templeofsolomon.org/Pyram..._symbolism.htm for a virtual mind boggling overview of The Great Pyramid. With that said, it is my opinion that the Star of Bethlehem was an astrological event witnessed ONLY by the highly advance Persian Magi. The 'Star' was (IS) revealed in an ancient astrological chart by the astrological geometric associations (aspects) of the Sun, Moon and planets. The chart can be viewed he http://www.templeofsolomon.org/pageone.htg/pageone.htm and a comparison of astronomical charts and astrological charts for the 2nd of March 5 BC can be seen he http://www.templeofsolomon.org/StarofBethlehem-star.htm It is unimportant if astrology is considered by some to be 'non-science'. The astrological charts have been prepared by employing methods that were used at the time of the birth of Christ (same as the western astrological chart of today). Best Regards, John Charles Webb, Jr. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
On 5 Dec 2005 13:11:14 -0800, wrote:
.... another bunch of stuff irrelevent to astronomy. Plonk! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
Not if you research Kepler or, ge3nerally, astronomical research
regarding the Star of Bethlehem. Having a problem with Uranus? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
The problem with all of this "Star of Bethlehem' stuff is that it assumes factual content of the Birth Narratives, which most serious New Testament scholars don't. Stop and consider: the "Decree of Augustus" in Luke, and the "Massacre of the Innocents" in Matthew, are both considered fictional events by non-religious historians. So how likely is either account to be true? Plus, the two Birth Narratives (in Luke and in Matthew) are mutually contradictory. (Read them carefully and critically). At least one must be false. Non-fundamentalist scholars assume that both are probably mostly (if not entirely) fiction. So the Star of Bethlehem was..... a made-up story, to try to make the birth of Jesus seem Really Important. Sorry. Robert Sheaffer - author, "The Making of the Messiah" wrote: Any celestial event that is assigned a 'meaning' (beyond physics) is within the realm of ancient astrology. Astronomy is 'observation' and astrology is 'interpretation'. To date, all of the astronomical theories and possibilities have been thoroughly investigated. All of the astronomical theories are mundane, however, all astronomical commentators have done a superb investigatory job probing the window of time (7 BC to 4 BC) and coming up with possible 'Star of Bethlehem' candidates. -- Robert Sheaffer - User name "Roberto" at debunker-dot-com Skeptical to the Max! Visit the Debunker's Domain - http://www.debunker.com Resources Debunking All Manner of Bogus Claims Also: Skepticism / Astronomy / Opera / more |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
The birth of Jesus was extremely important. Some day, you will realize that
importance. So the Star of Bethlehem was..... a made-up story, to try to make the birth of Jesus seem Really Important. Sorry. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
Robert Sheaffer wrote: The problem with all of this "Star of Bethlehem' stuff is that it assumes factual content of the Birth Narratives, which most serious New Testament scholars don't. Stop and consider: the "Decree of Augustus" in Luke, and the "Massacre of the Innocents" in Matthew, are both considered fictional events by non-religious historians. So how likely is either account to be true? Plus, the two Birth Narratives (in Luke and in Matthew) are mutually contradictory. (Read them carefully and critically). At least one must be false. Non-fundamentalist scholars assume that both are probably mostly (if not entirely) fiction. ************************************************** ** Well, you are 100% right regarding the literal words used in the writings. The purpose of my posting this Star of Bethlehem item in sci.astro.amateur is because I have found (research) that much of Matthew's account can also be interpreted as an astronomical/astrological allegory dealing with the beginning of the Piscean Age. (a star 'stopping' is a solstice -sun stationary - point). Presently there is no consensus about precisely when the current age began. There are variances, among commentators, of 300 to 500 years. This seems to me to be an astronomical issue dealing with precession (measurement of ages) and the calendar. Astronomers for over hundreds of years have attempted to find the star that Mathew references. If the star can be located, rather than, initially, dismissed as fiction, then astronomers (keepers of the calendar) could propose any necessary tweaks to get the calendar in alignment with precession and exactly where we are within the present age. Every degree (day) that the calendar was adjusted (+ or - ) either adds or subtracts 72 years of precessional movement (one degree of precession = 72 years). Plus no year "0" presents another precessional problem for calendar accuracy. Additionally, when all of the primary calendar adjustments were made the speed of light was not even contemplated. So, the early astronomers were looking at the sun not realizing that light speed issues had them seeing the sun's location 8 minutes earlier or 2 degrees 'off' of the earth's axis rotation, throwing off the zodiac (Vernal Equinox March 21st) an additional 2 degrees (which is 144 years of precessional movement). Finding the 'star', in my thinking, will help to align the zodiac and the calendar. Both of these issues are completely within the realm of astronomers, the keepers of the calendar. All of it is quite fascinating. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
Robert Sheaffer wrote:
The problem with all of this "Star of Bethlehem' stuff is that it assumes factual content of the Birth Narratives, which most serious New Testament scholars don't. Stop and consider: the "Decree of Augustus" in Luke, and the "Massacre of the Innocents" in Matthew, are both considered fictional events by non-religious historians. So how likely is either account to be true? Plus, the two Birth Narratives (in Luke and in Matthew) are mutually contradictory. (Read them carefully and critically). At least one must be false. Non-fundamentalist scholars assume that both are probably mostly (if not entirely) fiction. ************************************************** ** Well, you are 100% right regarding the literal words used in the writings. The purpose of my posting this Star of Bethlehem item in sci.astro.amateur is because I have found (research) that much of Matthew's account can also be interpreted as an astronomical/astrological allegory dealing with the beginning of the Piscean Age. (a star 'stopping' is a solstice -sun stationary - point). Presently there is no consensus about precisely when the current age began. There are variances, among commentators, of 300 to 500 years. This seems to me to be an astronomical issue dealing with precession (measurement of ages) and the calendar. Astronomers for over hundreds of years have attempted to find the star that Mathew references. If the star can be located, rather than, initially, dismissed as fiction, then astronomers (keepers of the calendar) could propose any necessary tweaks to get the calendar in alignment with precession and exactly where we are within the present age. Every degree (day) that the calendar was adjusted (+ or - ) either adds or subtracts 72 years of precessional movement (one degree of precession = 72 years). Plus no year "0" presents another precessional problem for calendar accuracy. Additionally, when all of the primary calendar adjustments were made the speed of light was not even contemplated. So, the early astronomers were looking at the sun not realizing that light speed issues had them seeing the sun's location 8 minutes earlier or 2 degrees 'off' of the earth's axis rotation, throwing off the zodiac (Vernal Equinox March 21st) an additional 2 degrees (which is 144 years of precessional movement). Finding the 'star', in my thinking, will help to align the zodiac and the calendar. Both of these issues are completely within the realm of astronomers, the keepers of the calendar. All of it is quite fascinating. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
In article QSamf.136$z21.131@fed1read04, Mij Adyaw wrote:
So the Star of Bethlehem was..... a made-up story, to try to make the birth of Jesus seem Really Important. Sorry. The birth of Jesus was extremely important. Some day, you will realize that importance. Nah - the important event here wasn't the birth of Jesus. The important event was the decision by the Roman Empire to make Christianity its State Religion. Without that, Christianity would probably have been an extinct religion today, and some other religion (islam?) would have become the dominant religion in the western world. Or perhaps Christianity would have been one among the many branches of "New Age" - these people enjoy trying to revive extinct religions... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
Paul,
It seems to me that you may have had a bad experience with Christianity. You should try to find a good Christian Church. Hopefully, one day you will understand the importance of the birth of Jesus and what he has done and is currently doing for the world. Merry Christmas and Best Regards, -mij "Paul Schlyter" wrote in message ... In article QSamf.136$z21.131@fed1read04, Mij Adyaw wrote: So the Star of Bethlehem was..... a made-up story, to try to make the birth of Jesus seem Really Important. Sorry. The birth of Jesus was extremely important. Some day, you will realize that importance. Nah - the important event here wasn't the birth of Jesus. The important event was the decision by the Roman Empire to make Christianity its State Religion. Without that, Christianity would probably have been an extinct religion today, and some other religion (islam?) would have become the dominant religion in the western world. Or perhaps Christianity would have been one among the many branches of "New Age" - these people enjoy trying to revive extinct religions... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Star of Bethlehem
In article bwDmf.277$z21.225@fed1read04, "Mij Adyaw"
wrote: Paul, It seems to me that you may have had a bad experience with Christianity. You should try to find a good Christian Church. Hopefully, one day you will understand the importance of the birth of Jesus and what he has done and is currently doing for the world. I prefer to not throw pearls before the swine, so to speak, particularly in a place like s.a.a. I think it's safe to assume most here are older, well-educated and rooted in their core beliefs/non-beliefs. -- Jay Swartzfeger http://www.swartzfeger.com Scottsdale, AZ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - January 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 7 | January 29th 04 09:29 PM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |