|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NASA plans to put astronauts back on moon by 2018, using old Apollo parts
NASA has decided to go 'Retro' ...
Way to go Dubywah !!!!!!!!! http://tinyurl.com/ay6mv [Quoting .... ] MARCIA DUNN 2 hours, 30 minutes ago CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) - NASA hopes to return astronauts to the moon by 2018, nearly a half-century after men last walked the lunar surface, by using a distinctly retro combination of space shuttle and Apollo rocket parts. ADVERTISEMENT The space agency presented its lunar exploration plan to the White House on Wednesday and on Capitol Hill on Friday. An announcement is set for Monday at NASA headquarters in Washington. The fact that this successor to the soon-to-be-retired shuttle relies so heavily on old-time equipment, rather than sporting fancy futuristic designs, "makes good technological and management sense," said John Logsdon, director of George Washington University's space policy institute. ... [ .....EndQuote ] --------------------------------- Do you plan to let me go For the other guy you left me for Don't you know that I heard it through the grapevine. (Heard it through the grapevine) Not much longer would you be mine. (Heard it, heard it, I heard it, yes I heard it) Oh, I heard it through the grapevine. (Heard it, heard it, I heard it, yes I heard it) Oh, heard it through the grapevine.(Heard it, heard it, I heard it, yes I heard it) I heard it through the grapevine. (Heard it, heard it, I heard it, yes I heard it) Woo, I heard it through the grapevine. (Heard it, heard it, I heard it, yes I heard it) I heard it through the grapevine. (Heard it, heard it, I heard it, yes I heard it) Oh, heard it throught the grapevine.(Heard it, heard it, I heard it, yes I heard it) ~ Marvin Gaye and the Temptations See http://tinyurl.com/clc6j for full lyrics |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Raving Loonie wrote: NASA has decided to go 'Retro' ... Way to go Dubywah !!!!!!!!! http://tinyurl.com/ay6mv [Quoting .... ] MARCIA DUNN 2 hours, 30 minutes ago CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) - NASA hopes to return astronauts to the moon by 2018, nearly a half-century after men last walked the lunar surface, Think that's enough time? The original program took less than 10 years. But then we know that today's NASA can't begin to fill the jockstraps of the NASA of the 60's! by using a distinctly retro combination of space shuttle and Apollo rocket parts. What choice do they have? They haven't even been able to come up with a new shuttle design in 30 years! The space agency presented its lunar exploration plan to the White House on Wednesday and on Capitol Hill on Friday. An announcement is set for Monday at NASA headquarters in Washington. The fact that this successor to the soon-to-be-retired shuttle relies so heavily on old-time equipment, rather than sporting fancy futuristic designs, "makes good technological and management sense," said John Logsdon, director of George Washington University's space policy institute. ... [ .....EndQuote ] Sure, lean heavily on the old designs. Those guys way back then had the "Right Stuff!" Maybe they can just roll those old mothballed Saturn V's out of the museums and fuel them up! That way it shouldn't take them so mamy years. How will NASA get off the ground again if Delta folds? Maybe they can requisition the Spruce Goose! Double-A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Double-A and RL Fact is NASA left two Saturn V that were ready to
fly. Once Nixon got his So. Calif. Mafia cronies to push out the Apollo great engineers,they knew they could not copy what was done. Today they are the same low brain idiots that put wings on rockets,and could only go round and round for 37 years in low orbit,accomplishing nothing with the Micky Mouse shuttle other than killing 14 astronauts in 113 flights. It takes great engineering to put men on the Moon and bring them back safely to Earth. People working today know they can't even "copy" the NASA of the Apollo program. When they take just one look at the mighty Saturn V they **** in their pants. Bert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The problem is not new designs, but getting Congress to pay for them!
Saul Levy On 17 Sep 2005 00:08:09 -0700, "Double-A" wrote: Raving Loonie wrote: NASA has decided to go 'Retro' ... Way to go Dubywah !!!!!!!!! http://tinyurl.com/ay6mv [Quoting .... ] MARCIA DUNN 2 hours, 30 minutes ago CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) - NASA hopes to return astronauts to the moon by 2018, nearly a half-century after men last walked the lunar surface, Think that's enough time? The original program took less than 10 years. But then we know that today's NASA can't begin to fill the jockstraps of the NASA of the 60's! by using a distinctly retro combination of space shuttle and Apollo rocket parts. What choice do they have? They haven't even been able to come up with a new shuttle design in 30 years! The space agency presented its lunar exploration plan to the White House on Wednesday and on Capitol Hill on Friday. An announcement is set for Monday at NASA headquarters in Washington. The fact that this successor to the soon-to-be-retired shuttle relies so heavily on old-time equipment, rather than sporting fancy futuristic designs, "makes good technological and management sense," said John Logsdon, director of George Washington University's space policy institute. ... [ .....EndQuote ] Sure, lean heavily on the old designs. Those guys way back then had the "Right Stuff!" Maybe they can just roll those old mothballed Saturn V's out of the museums and fuel them up! That way it shouldn't take them so mamy years. How will NASA get off the ground again if Delta folds? Maybe they can requisition the Spruce Goose! Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Double-A Its getting hard to go to Switzerland for NASA Mafia to
count their money. Delta is coming apart like the shuttles when not even off the ground. Swiss-Air will be the air line of choice. Beert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Hi Double-A Its getting hard to go to Switzerland for NASA Mafia to count their money. Delta is coming apart like the shuttles when not even off the ground. Swiss-Air will be the air line of choice. Beert Hi world, ... cough Isn't 'reinventing' the wheel is far more sensible than 'refurbishing' the wheel, here. We *now* live in the computer age. I would have hoped that the engineering challenge of developing viable spacecraft would be much reduced by now ... ... eh ? Heck, why doesn't NASA simply buy it Wal Mart ... not sexy enough ? RL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Saul Levy wrote: The problem is not new designs, but getting Congress to pay for them! Saul Levy Yeah, our government would rather spend 200 billion to rebuild a hurricane vulnerable city on a sinking sand bar! Double-A On 17 Sep 2005 00:08:09 -0700, "Double-A" wrote: Raving Loonie wrote: NASA has decided to go 'Retro' ... Way to go Dubywah !!!!!!!!! http://tinyurl.com/ay6mv [Quoting .... ] MARCIA DUNN 2 hours, 30 minutes ago CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) - NASA hopes to return astronauts to the moon by 2018, nearly a half-century after men last walked the lunar surface, Think that's enough time? The original program took less than 10 years. But then we know that today's NASA can't begin to fill the jockstraps of the NASA of the 60's! by using a distinctly retro combination of space shuttle and Apollo rocket parts. What choice do they have? They haven't even been able to come up with a new shuttle design in 30 years! The space agency presented its lunar exploration plan to the White House on Wednesday and on Capitol Hill on Friday. An announcement is set for Monday at NASA headquarters in Washington. The fact that this successor to the soon-to-be-retired shuttle relies so heavily on old-time equipment, rather than sporting fancy futuristic designs, "makes good technological and management sense," said John Logsdon, director of George Washington University's space policy institute. ... [ .....EndQuote ] Sure, lean heavily on the old designs. Those guys way back then had the "Right Stuff!" Maybe they can just roll those old mothballed Saturn V's out of the museums and fuel them up! That way it shouldn't take them so mamy years. How will NASA get off the ground again if Delta folds? Maybe they can requisition the Spruce Goose! Double-A |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Raving Loonie wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Hi Double-A Its getting hard to go to Switzerland for NASA Mafia to count their money. Delta is coming apart like the shuttles when not even off the ground. Swiss-Air will be the air line of choice. Beert Hi world, ... cough Isn't 'reinventing' the wheel is far more sensible than 'refurbishing' the wheel, here. We *now* live in the computer age. I would have hoped that the engineering challenge of developing viable spacecraft would be much reduced by now ... ... eh ? Heck, why doesn't NASA simply buy it Wal Mart ... not sexy enough ? RL Why not? All their stuff is made in China, and I haven't heard of any problems with the Chinese space program recently. Double-A |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Double-A wrote:
Saul Levy wrote: The problem is not new designs, but getting Congress to pay for them! Saul Levy Yeah, our government would rather spend 200 billion to rebuild a hurricane vulnerable city on a sinking sand bar! Double-A [snip] Gee whizz ... ... perfectly in keeping with reviving the Apollo program and merging it with shuttle technology. The 'contractors' will be having a feeding frenzy ! RL |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Hi Double-A Its getting hard to go to Switzerland for NASA Mafia to count their money. Idiot. Delta is coming apart like the shuttles when not even off the ground. Swiss-Air will be the air line of choice. Beert -- Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler "The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with both male and female genitalia." "Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core." -- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | UK Astronomy | 11 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Misc | 4 | April 15th 04 04:45 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | November 7th 03 08:53 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ v4 | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 4th 03 11:52 PM |