A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aitken's criteria for double stars



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 30th 03, 06:46 PM
Martin Nicholson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aitken's criteria for double stars

A couple of months back, Mark G gave it as

log d + 0.2 m 2.8

where d is the separation in arcseconds, log is base 10, and m is the
magnitude of the secondary. For example, if the separation is 10
arcseconds, then the secondary must be no dimmer than magnitude 9 to
satisfy Aitken's criterion, since

log 10 + 0.2*9 = 1 + 1.8 = 2.8


I now understand that Mark was incorrect in what he stated and that it
is the combined magnitude of the pair that represents the value of m!

I have tried twice to contact Mark without luck so I hope he still
reads this newsgroup.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMBER ALPHA STAR CESAM stellar model harlod caufield Space Shuttle 0 December 27th 03 08:12 PM
AMBER ALPHA STAR CESAM stellar model harlod caufield Policy 0 December 27th 03 08:10 PM
Incontrovertible Evidence Cash Astronomy Misc 1 August 24th 03 07:22 PM
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report Ron Baalke Science 0 July 21st 03 06:10 PM
Stars rich in heavy metals tend to harbor planets, astronomers report(Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 July 21st 03 05:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.