|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aitken's criteria for double stars
A couple of months back, Mark G gave it as
log d + 0.2 m 2.8 where d is the separation in arcseconds, log is base 10, and m is the magnitude of the secondary. For example, if the separation is 10 arcseconds, then the secondary must be no dimmer than magnitude 9 to satisfy Aitken's criterion, since log 10 + 0.2*9 = 1 + 1.8 = 2.8 I now understand that Mark was incorrect in what he stated and that it is the combined magnitude of the pair that represents the value of m! I have tried twice to contact Mark without luck so I hope he still reads this newsgroup. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMBER ALPHA STAR CESAM stellar model | harlod caufield | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 27th 03 08:12 PM |
AMBER ALPHA STAR CESAM stellar model | harlod caufield | Policy | 0 | December 27th 03 08:10 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 21st 03 06:10 PM |
Stars rich in heavy metals tend to harbor planets, astronomers report(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 21st 03 05:45 PM |