Despite the present belief in circulation that a person would be burned at the stake for proposing the Earth goes around the Sun as a theological necessity there are a few people who are familiar with the thorny issue as it actually existed and unfortunately,at least presently, nobody cares how to untangle the technical details and resolve the issue once and for all.
Some of the commentaries are quite accurate but they are,after all, commentaries and not innovations needed to resolve the difference between predictive astronomy and interpretative astronomy -
https://books.google.ie/books?id=Z7x...ge&q&f=fa lse
The resolution has been mentioned in the other thread where the parent observation contained in the leap day rotation goes into two separate directions. For research and proof of the Earth's daily and annual motions the parent 1461 rotations within the confines of 4 orbital circuits reduces to 365 1/4 rotations per orbital circuit whereas for predictive astronomy within the calendar framework, the 365/366 rotation format is used.
Nothing can be done with people who force themselves to believe the Earth turns 1465 times within 4 orbital circuits as it serves neither predictive astronomy nor interpretative astronomy. The high end welfare scam using voodoo and bluff may entertain those who have completely forgotten planetary dynamics and congratulate themselves with the accuracy modern timekeeping devices but they care nothing for both the technical and historical details create the anchor for dynamics and timekeeping using 4 orbital circuits of the Earth and daily rotation as a gauge.