FW: Simple Question

I'm fairly sure that it has failed the observational test of seeing
clusters of clusters of galaxies,

Mmmm what about those "rivers of galaxies" that have been proposed?

They should criss-cross the universe in a net, that leaves great voids, like cheese.

jacob

I'm fairly sure that it has failed the observational test of seeing
clusters of clusters of galaxies,

Mmmm what about those "rivers of galaxies" that have been proposed?

They should criss-cross the universe in a net, that leaves great voids, like cheese.

jacob

See also http://alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxtheexc.html.
But we wander away from astrophysics -- mjh]

Yes, that is a biblical site that says... well you all know: the bible and so on.

The idea is interesting though.

A hierarchical Universe, with scales like the planck distance, that are infinite, i.e. in each
"planck cube" there could be a whole universe, invisible for ever to us.

And we would be part of an incredible big universe, where our whole universe is beyond *their*
planck's distance.

But since there will be never any way of knowing for us, it is not science.

jacob

See also http://alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxtheexc.html.
But we wander away from astrophysics -- mjh]

Yes, that is a biblical site that says... well you all know: the bible and so on.

The idea is interesting though.

A hierarchical Universe, with scales like the planck distance, that are infinite, i.e. in each
"planck cube" there could be a whole universe, invisible for ever to us.

And we would be part of an incredible big universe, where our whole universe is beyond *their*
planck's distance.

But since there will be never any way of knowing for us, it is not science.

jacob