|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Decreasing Errors For Binary Star System Masses
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:27:43 PM UTC-4, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply wrote:
Probably not, as a "definitive prediction" (direct quote from the abstract) of a DSR paper has, now that experimental accuracy and precision is much better than when the paper was written, been falsified. There is no evidence of substructure of the electron at the predicted level. I have patiently explained at least 6 times on various forums (including SAR) why this argument is false and misleading. Yet the poster keeps posting this deceitful misinformation as if I had never pointed out that his arguments are based on gross misunderstanding of what Discrete Scale Relativity actually predicts. The prediction has not been falsified. The poster has not attempted to refute to my explanation of why he is wrong in this matter. He just keeps repeating the same mistake over and over. You will have to ask him why. [Mod. note: unfortunately it is not really up to the proposer of a model to decide whether it has been falsified or not. Scientific consensus does that. This part of the thread is now closed -- mjh] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Masses of G and F Star Binaries | Robert L. Oldershaw | Research | 6 | February 2nd 14 05:32 PM |
Is it possible that the sun is in a binary star system? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 28 | March 5th 09 02:26 AM |
New double star and binary star site | ukastronomy | UK Astronomy | 5 | August 12th 07 10:42 PM |
Total brightness of a binary star system. | sed | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 25th 05 09:18 PM |
Gravity and a Binary Star System. | Max Keon | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 13th 03 11:04 AM |