A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

They Might Be Giants



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 6th 08, 06:20 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.environment,sci.space.policy,alt.politics.bush
Phil Cartwright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default They Might Be Giants

kT wrote:
Error 404: post not found.


Even I, normally an extremely *harsh* critic of all things superbowl[snip]


Oh, is *that* what this is all about?

Since I don't see any mention of the aerodynamics of a spinning
football, or the impulse given to a 70kg wide receiver by a body blow
from a 110kg linebacker traveling at 8km/h, or the minimum elevation and
muzzle velocity required to launch a football from the 35 yard line at
the goal and have it pass above the crossbar, I don't see how any of
this is relevant to sci.physics.

Since there are, to my knowledge, as yet no known cases of a punt or a
field goal achieving orbit (even when kicked by Lawrence Tynes) it also
seems irrelevant to sci.space.policy.

Since the most notable celebrity at the game, aside from the players
themselves, was Gisele Bundchen and she didn't even uncover her
Victoria's Secret lingerie, let alone bare a breast, and they didn't air
any political ads, it doesn't look like alt.politics.bush is a relevant
group either.

Since the number of offensive players that may legally be in motion at
the time of the snap isn't legislated by Congress, nor a case of
suspected pass interference tried in court, nor whether to retract the
stadium roof a White House executive decision, this subject seems
unlikely to be relevant in *.policy or alt.politics.* anyway.

So you've scored the trifecta: your usenet post was irrelevant in all
three groups it was crossposted to. The average being seventy percent.

F'up to sci.physics, for want of anything better that I actually read
regularly.

--
There's only four things you can be certain of: taxes, change, spam, and
death.
  #12  
Old February 6th 08, 10:45 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.environment,sci.space.policy,alt.politics.bush
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default They Might Be Giants

Phil Cartwright wrote:
kT wrote:


So you've scored the trifecta: your usenet post was irrelevant in all
three groups it was crossposted to. The average being seventy percent.

F'up to sci.physics, for want of anything better that I actually read
regularly.


The term actually does apply to science, physics and rocketry as weii,
you know that, right? The patriots lost, and the underdogs won, so that
involves politics.

I think that pretty much covers it.

Next.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question About Gas Giants AC Research 0 June 20th 07 05:11 PM
Gas Giants questions 46erjoe Misc 1 November 6th 06 05:20 AM
gas giants andyneored5 Misc 3 September 2nd 04 04:30 AM
Planets - gas giants Harry Lawless Solar 0 April 28th 04 06:56 AM
Help needed about Red Giants Val Research 3 April 7th 04 10:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.