#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fed Up!
I'd like to see more sci.space.policy postings and less postings about Alan
Erskine. Yes he may be a kook, but I don't like to see his name posted all over the newsgroup as useless filler. If you don't want anyone to pay attention to him, then stop drawing attention to him, pleasse! Tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fed Up!
TKalbfus wrote:
I'd like to see more sci.space.policy postings and less postings about Alan Erskine. Yes he may be a kook, but I don't like to see his name posted all over the newsgroup as useless filler. If you don't want anyone to pay attention to him, then stop drawing attention to him, pleasse! Tom Anyone can be ignored (and some should well be), but there's no limiting postings in an unmoderated newsgroup. He's 'filler' not because of some editorial decision, but because he makes himself so. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fed Up!
"Joann Evans" wrote in message
... Anyone can be ignored (and some should well be), but there's no limiting postings in an unmoderated newsgroup. He's 'filler' not because of some editorial decision, but because he makes himself so. No, I didn't make myself so. I am simply defending against the continued attacks by a coward using anonymous remailers to hide behind. This same kind of attack occurred some two years ago (from memory) and also used anonymous remailers. Someone sent me the following email: "Good lord, man! Don't you remember? It was ~two years ago, and lasted for months. It's when the Collective got their name; Daniel posted as Mountain Camper out of somewhere in Colorado. Daniel posed as the most reasonable member of the three, yet turned out to be the most treacherous. It was he who contacted the employers of two or three regulars, while John and Paul merely looked insane and paranoid, respectively. There were also a *lot* of anonymous posts out of dizum during that period; I believe it was Daniel, writing anonymously to preserve his "more reasonable" image." Daniel is now posting as "Charleston". Alan Erskine alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au Is Lewis Moran the type of father figure John Howard wants for Australian children? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|