|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rotation of solar system moons
Is there a credible source of up to date info. on the rotation periods
of planetary moons across our solar system? I want to know for example, do the Gaililean moons all have independent rotation periods or are they all in 'captured' orbits around Jupiter? What about Phobos, Deimos, Titan, Triton and Charon? Second question is: Would our own Moon have had more than 1/6th of a g of gravity if it had a significantly faster rotation rate than its present 'captured' rotation about Earth? (i.e. if a 'day' on the Moon was longer than a sidereal 'month' as at present). What is the relationship if any between the spin rate of a planetary body and the size of its gravity field? Thanks Abdul Ahad http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagent/astronomy.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi there. You posted:
Is there a credible source of up to date info. on the rotation periods of planetary moons across our solar system? I want to know for example, do the Gaililean moons all have independent rotation periods or are they all in 'captured' orbits around Jupiter? Most of the moons of the major planets are tidally "locked" so their rotation period is equal to their orbital period. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
David Knisely wrote in message ...
Most of the moons of the major planets are tidally "locked" so their rotation period is equal to their orbital period. Clear skies to you. -- Hi, I was after the *specific* details about each moon's rotation vs revolution. While *most* of the moons in our solar system are in captured orbits (tidally "locked") around their planets, I am thinking there has to be a few that have independent rotations? I am probably asking for the impossible as many moons are too small to bounce radar off them and get reliable estimates of rotation based on radar echoes, doppler shifts, etc. but if I could *know* the score with the bigger ones like Titan, Triton, Charon then that's sufficient. I know, for example, Triton's revolution around Neptune is in a *retrograde* orbit i.e. its orbital motion is in a direction opposite to the planet's rotation. But does Triton have an independent rotation of its own or is it also *locked* to Neptune in the same way that our Moon is locked with the Earth? The second question is more dynamical... I would have thought that if a planetary object spins faster on its axis, then it has a stronger graviatational field...is this a fair assumption? Hence if our Moon had an independent rotation, would it have had more than the present 1/6th of a g? Abdul Ahad |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Abdul Ahad wrote:
Is there a credible source of up to date info. on the rotation periods of planetary moons across our solar system? I want to know for example, do the Gaililean moons all have independent rotation periods or are they all in 'captured' orbits around Jupiter? What about Phobos, Deimos, Titan, Triton and Charon? Have you tried NASA's "Planetary Fact Sheets" at http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/planetfact.html ? There's a fair bit of data on at least the larger satellites. I would think NASA to be at least reasonably credible, but I don't know how up-to-date the pages are. Second question is: Would our own Moon have had more than 1/6th of a g of gravity if it had a significantly faster rotation rate than its present 'captured' rotation about Earth? (i.e. if a 'day' on the Moon was longer than a sidereal 'month' as at present). What is the relationship if any between the spin rate of a planetary body and the size of its gravity field? No; an object's gravitational attraction is completely unaffected by its spin, being a function of its mass alone. For an observer on the surface of a rotating planet or moon (anywhere but at a pole) the body's spin actually makes its gravity seem weaker because of "centrifugal force". This effect is pretty small, though: for example on the earth's equator objects seem only about 0.2% lighter than they would if the planet didn't rotate, and of course there's even less difference at higher latitudes. The Fact Sheets at the above link give both the "surface gravity" and "surface acceleration" for each body, showing the effect of its spin on an object's weight at the equator. -- Odysseus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Abdul Ahad
writes David Knisely wrote in message ... Most of the moons of the major planets are tidally "locked" so their rotation period is equal to their orbital period. Clear skies to you. -- Hi, I was after the *specific* details about each moon's rotation vs revolution. While *most* of the moons in our solar system are in captured orbits (tidally "locked") around their planets, I am thinking there has to be a few that have independent rotations? I am probably asking for the impossible as many moons are too small to bounce radar off them and get reliable estimates of rotation based on radar echoes, doppler shifts, etc. but if I could *know* the score with the bigger ones like Titan, Triton, Charon then that's sufficient. It's known by direct observation that nearly all the moons are tidally locked - AFAIK the only exception is Hyperion, which is in a chaotic rotation. Some of the small moons haven't been observed directly - Phoebe comes to mind (cancel that - I just found that Phoebe has a 4 day rotation period. That's interesting, because most of the rocks in the solar system rotate in a few hours. I'd guess it's feeling _some_ tidal effect). Pluto and Charon are _mutually_ locked. Triton is locked. -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Have you tried NASA's "Planetary Fact Sheets" at
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/planetfact.html ? There's a fair bit of data on at least the larger satellites. I would think NASA to be at least reasonably credible, but I don't know how up-to-date the pages are. Thanks! yes, the NASA factsheets are a rich source of info, last updated 2001, so takes account of many recent spacecraft visits. In summary, ALL the major moons from Mars' tiny Phobos and Deimos all the way up to Titan and Ganymede are in synchronous orbits. Only exceptions are two moons of Saturn: Hyperion (*chaotic* rotation) and Phoebe - the latter has all the hallmarks of a captured asteroid! Abdul Ahad http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagent/astronomy.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spacecraft Doppler&Light Speed Extrapolation | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 91 | August 1st 13 01:32 PM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |
Solar System vs. deep-sky | Dave & Janelle | Amateur Astronomy | 33 | November 29th 03 05:26 PM |
ESA sees stardust storms heading for Solar System (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 27th 03 12:29 AM |