|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge
is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. Its fun stuff TreBert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On Mar 2, 6:38*pm, herbert glazier wrote:
Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. *Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? Tricky stuff TreBert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On Mar 4, 6:56*am, herbert glazier wrote:
On Mar 2, 6:38*pm, herbert glazier wrote: Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. *Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction * Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? *Tricky stuff * *TreBert I think matter+anti-matter is worth at least E=MC3, and perhaps the inverse square law becomes the inverse cubic if not the inverse quad law. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
QUIT TRYING TO CHANGE PHYSICS, FOOL!
YOU WILL NEVER SUCCEED! Saul Levy On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:44:22 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 4, 6:56*am, herbert glazier wrote: On Mar 2, 6:38*pm, herbert glazier wrote: Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. *Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction * Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? *Tricky stuff * *TreBert I think matter+anti-matter is worth at least E=MC3, and perhaps the inverse square law becomes the inverse cubic if not the inverse quad law. Brad Guth, THE VILLAGE IDIOT! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On Mar 4, 3:44*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 4, 6:56*am, herbert glazier wrote: On Mar 2, 6:38*pm, herbert glazier wrote: Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. *Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction * Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? *Tricky stuff * *TreBert I think matter+anti-matter is worth at least E=MC3, and perhaps the inverse square law becomes the inverse cubic if not the inverse quad law. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Inverse cube Hmmm nice thinking BG might fit with string theory,and its extra dimentions. I had thoughts on micro gravity in this way. TreBert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On Mar 4, 2:46*pm, herbert glazier wrote:
On Mar 4, 3:44*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 4, 6:56*am, herbert glazier wrote: On Mar 2, 6:38*pm, herbert glazier wrote: Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. *Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction * Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? *Tricky stuff * *TreBert I think matter+anti-matter is worth at least E=MC3, and perhaps the inverse square law becomes the inverse cubic if not the inverse quad law. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Inverse cube Hmmm nice thinking BG *might fit with string theory,and its extra dimentions. I had thoughts on micro gravity in this way. TreBert If the negative-matter realm and the positive-anti-matter realm each run by their own E=MC2, it seems only logical that those should combine to make something much greater than just the sum of their individual mass combining at 2c. Possibly as great as E=(M 2C2)2. When is the LHC going to smash a few trillion positrons into a few trillion electrons? (being that electrons and positrons are naturally attracted to one another, should make the colliding job much easier) http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On Mar 4, 3:44*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 4, 6:56*am, herbert glazier wrote: On Mar 2, 6:38*pm, herbert glazier wrote: Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. *Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction * Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? *Tricky stuff * *TreBert I think matter+anti-matter is worth at least E=MC3, and perhaps the inverse square law becomes the inverse cubic if not the inverse quad law. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Yesterday I posted a reply to your cube law. I said it was good thinking. Cubic inverse law I have thoughts on gravity TreBert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On Mar 4, 5:25*pm, wrote:
QUIT TRYING TO CHANGE PHYSICS, FOOL! YOU WILL NEVER SUCCEED! Saul Levy On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:44:22 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 4, 6:56 am, herbert glazier wrote: On Mar 2, 6:38 pm, herbert glazier wrote: Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? Tricky stuff TreBert I think matter+anti-matter is worth at least E=MC3, and perhaps the inverse square law becomes the inverse cubic if not the inverse quad law. Brad Guth, THE VILLAGE IDIOT! test |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On 3/5/2011 9:28 AM, herbert glazier wrote:
On Mar 4, 3:44 pm, Brad wrote: Yesterday I posted a reply to your cube law. I said it was good thinking. Cubic inverse law I have thoughts on gravity TreBert "If you agree with Guthtard on anything, you are an idiot" -HVAC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya
On Mar 4, 6:05*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 4, 2:46*pm, herbert glazier wrote: On Mar 4, 3:44*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 4, 6:56*am, herbert glazier wrote: On Mar 2, 6:38*pm, herbert glazier wrote: Reality is anti-matter exists,and has positive energy,but its charge is reversed. We have yet to detect negative matter. My reasoning is negative matter only exists in my convex curve of spacetime.(it would fall up always) and right from the start of the big bang. It can only be found at the edge of the expanding universe. *Its fun stuff TreBert Reality is negative energy has been detected in the lab.It was discovered about 65 years ago. Negative energy was proven by the Casimir effect. Fact is the smaller the distance between the plates the greater the force of attraction * Hmmm can we bring in the inverse square law here? *Tricky stuff * *TreBert I think matter+anti-matter is worth at least E=MC3, and perhaps the inverse square law becomes the inverse cubic if not the inverse quad law. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Inverse cube Hmmm nice thinking BG *might fit with string theory,and its extra dimentions. I had thoughts on micro gravity in this way. TreBert If the negative-matter realm and the positive-anti-matter realm each run by their own E=MC2, it seems only logical that those should combine to make something much greater than just the sum of their individual mass combining at 2c. *Possibly as great as E=(M 2C2)2. When is the LHC going to smash a few trillion positrons into a few trillion electrons? (being that electrons and positrons are naturally attracted to one another, should make the colliding job much easier) *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Particles of opposite charge not coming together is answered by my "Time laps theory" TreBert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anti Gavity Anti Matter Anti universe Treb & Bert = | bert | Misc | 5 | July 25th 10 01:40 PM |
Ooops Answering oc on matter and anti matter I forgot this. | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 19 | February 14th 09 11:49 PM |
Perpetum dark matter dilemma, the theory of perpetual motion,non-radioactive anti-gravity, theory of mass energy, natural distribution ofweight and inertia (for highest Ph.D astronomers studying dark matter,cosmologists) | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 12th 08 08:26 PM |
Does Anti-Matter Matter to us ??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 21 | June 15th 07 01:23 PM |
BB and Its Matter and Anti-matter. | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 18 | September 21st 03 06:03 PM |