A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Satellites
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 3rd 04, 10:15 PM
bart janssens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?

I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE...

So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality
of the space-travel-thing...


You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr
for space-travel around the earth

That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated
for an earthly object of one kilogram...

So the whole space-travel-thing is fake...
and you can easily see this
at any launch of a Space Shuttle...

(that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore...
and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.)

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html
  #2  
Old February 3rd 04, 10:55 PM
Alexander Avtanski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?

Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))



bart janssens wrote:

I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE...

So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality
of the space-travel-thing...


You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr
for space-travel around the earth

That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated
for an earthly object of one kilogram...

So the whole space-travel-thing is fake...
and you can easily see this
at any launch of a Space Shuttle...

(that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore...
and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.)

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html


  #3  
Old February 3rd 04, 10:55 PM
Alexander Avtanski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?

Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))



bart janssens wrote:

I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE...

So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality
of the space-travel-thing...


You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr
for space-travel around the earth

That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated
for an earthly object of one kilogram...

So the whole space-travel-thing is fake...
and you can easily see this
at any launch of a Space Shuttle...

(that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore...
and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.)

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html


  #6  
Old February 4th 04, 12:38 AM
Stephen Fels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?


"Skywise" wrote in message
. 125.201...
(bart janssens) wrote in
m:

I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE...

So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality
of the space-travel-thing...


You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr
for space-travel around the earth

That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated
for an earthly object of one kilogram...

So the whole space-travel-thing is fake...
and you can easily see this
at any launch of a Space Shuttle...

(that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore...
and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.)

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

Can you tell me what you're smoking? I'd like to
avoid it.

Please don't feed the trolls. This guy is a certified net loon and will tend
to pester beyond simple annoyance.
--
Stephen
Home Page: stephmon.com
Satellite Hunting: sathunt.com


  #7  
Old February 4th 04, 12:38 AM
Stephen Fels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?


"Skywise" wrote in message
. 125.201...
(bart janssens) wrote in
m:

I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE...

So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality
of the space-travel-thing...


You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr
for space-travel around the earth

That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated
for an earthly object of one kilogram...

So the whole space-travel-thing is fake...
and you can easily see this
at any launch of a Space Shuttle...

(that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore...
and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.)

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

Can you tell me what you're smoking? I'd like to
avoid it.

Please don't feed the trolls. This guy is a certified net loon and will tend
to pester beyond simple annoyance.
--
Stephen
Home Page: stephmon.com
Satellite Hunting: sathunt.com


  #8  
Old February 7th 04, 10:38 PM
bart janssens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?

Alexander Avtanski wrote in message ...
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))


What did you see?

A stone, which could be a natural satellite?
Or was it a articifial satellite?

Or do you admit there is NO visual difference???

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html




bart janssens wrote:

I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE...

So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality
of the space-travel-thing...


You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr
for space-travel around the earth

That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated
for an earthly object of one kilogram...

So the whole space-travel-thing is fake...
and you can easily see this
at any launch of a Space Shuttle...

(that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore...
and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.)

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

  #9  
Old February 7th 04, 10:38 PM
bart janssens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?

Alexander Avtanski wrote in message ...
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))


What did you see?

A stone, which could be a natural satellite?
Or was it a articifial satellite?

Or do you admit there is NO visual difference???

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html




bart janssens wrote:

I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE...

So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality
of the space-travel-thing...


You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr
for space-travel around the earth

That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated
for an earthly object of one kilogram...

So the whole space-travel-thing is fake...
and you can easily see this
at any launch of a Space Shuttle...

(that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore...
and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.)

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

  #10  
Old February 8th 04, 04:27 PM
Stephen Fels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?


"bart janssens" wrote in message
om...
Alexander Avtanski wrote in message

...
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))


What did you see?


Depending on the telescope and tracking, anyone with the knowhow can see
something like this...
http://www.astronomy.com/Content/Dyn...0/845hvkyl.asp

A stone, which could be a natural satellite?


Most definitely not.

Or was it a articifial satellite?


Absolutely.

Or do you admit there is NO visual difference???


There is a vast visual difference, namely structure, predictable position,
etc..

Now, go hawk your flawed theories to a group who doesn't prove you wrong
every clear night.
--
Stephen
Home Page: stephmon.com
Satellite Hunting: sathunt.com


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mars Rover Inspects Stone Ejected From Crater Ron Astronomy Misc 0 May 17th 04 10:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.