#31
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
test - disregard
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Requested cites and page numbers. (Was: Booster Crossing)
Chuck Stewart
(In JTM's world the IUS is supposed to have been ignited in the payload bay and have smashed into and destroyed the forward portions of the orbiter, The lack of an IUS-sized hole in the back of the crew module deters JTM in this belief not at all.) John Maxson What, no page reference? Page 80 You're overboard with embellishing. What was the IUS deal then? Chuck Stewart In his attempts to assert that the SRB's crossed (pg 4), JTM forgets to mention that after their initial crossing his book has them crossing _yet again_ with each booster resuming its pre-breakup position to the left and right of the debris cloud (Reference: pg 6, "The Betrayal Of Mission 51-L") John Maxson Huh? "Forgets to mention?" It's online! Huh? It's on page six. So does the SRB with the plume was the right SRB? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Requested cites and page numbers. (Was: Booster Crossing)
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 04:39:35 +0000, Kent Betts wrote:
John Maxson my cites: IUS What, no page reference? Page 80 You're overboard with embellishing. What embellishment? The efforts of your son in this newsgroup to show you that IUS-as-deliberate-executioner _couldn't_ have happened were sadly amusing. As were the rants in your book of a "propulsive IUS missile". What was the IUS deal then? It was supposed to insure the destruction of Challenger... a standard netkook tactic: "overkill sans research" my cites: "Dance Of The SRB's" John Maxson Huh? "Forgets to mention?" It's online! Nuff' said. Huh? It's on page six. So does the SRB with the plume was the right SRB? In reality it's on the right and stays on the right. But my purpose was not to carry on a second-hand debate through Kent with a delusional person I've killfiled. I responded, however, to a request to back up my assertions... even one from a killfiled netkook. My assertions we "This is important to JTM because he has his own incoherently expressed story about what destroyed Challenger... that being an intentional act of sabotage and murder by the men and women of NASA at the orders of a military cabal led by Ronald Reagan. And no... I'm _not_ making that up. Where Challenger is conserned JTM is quite delusional." And I cited my references to show that this, indeed, is what JTM claims in his book... as mealy-mouthed and weasel-worded as he tries to be about it. And lest JTM try to forget, for every cite given I have notes on a dozen more in the book... including on the assertions I've made. As the Bentusi say: "This war is over." JTM's book was written without his objectively thinking through and researching the very concepts he espouses. And since he has wasted his life since Challenger pursuing it he cannot, absolutely cannot, go back and correct even the most egregious errors. So he tries to pretend that he never made the errors. And then he brings this crap to a science newsgroup. And, sadly, people feel they _must_ respond... -- Chuck Stewart "Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?" |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
My Education
On 1 Sep 2003 21:41:14 -0700, (Jon Berndt) wrote:
The point is, what is your experience and education in aerospace vehicle flight dynamics and control? EOM? etc. ....He has none. He was a ****ing *janitor*, and a lousy one at that. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
My Education
Jon Berndt wrote in message
om... The point is, what is your experience and education in aerospace vehicle flight dynamics and control? EOM? etc. That is not your point. It is the Lockheed agenda you push with your every post. As Dr. Feynman pointed out, this idea of a trained eye is a complete myth. *Anybody* can look at the evidence and form a conclusion about what he/she sees. There is no need for someone like you, who always purports to be a seeing-eye dog for a sci.space.shuttle gone blind. I've mentioned my extensive aerospace experience in guidance and control systems here on many occasions. I've pioneered the design of complex digital systems for engineering analysis. My experience in developing dynamic simulations for some major aerospace firms (as well as NASA) is a matter of record. -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck Stewart Insists on Libel
Chuck Stewart wrote in message
news John Maxson You're overboard with embellishing. What embellishment? Your yesterday's libel, done without page reference, then left out: "(In JTM's world the IUS is supposed to have been ignited in the payload bay and have smashed into and destroyed the forward portions of the orbiter, The lack of an IUS-sized hole in the back of the crew module deters JTM in this belief not at all.)" JTM's book was written without his objectively thinking through and researching the very concepts he espouses. And since he has wasted his life since Challenger pursuing it he cannot, absolutely cannot, go back and correct even the most egregious errors. So he tries to pretend that he never made the errors. And then he brings this crap to a science newsgroup. More libel -- lots more libel. That's still your game, obviously. And, sadly, people feel they _must_ respond... Somebody has a gun to your head? -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
In article , "John Maxson"
wrote: It must be a very humbling experience, considering how many times I've explained the technical details of the fireball crossing to you, and reiterated that my book was written for the layman, after careful consideration of the advice of many professionals. Uh, not to put too fine a point on things, but you've NEVER explained in even vague concepts how the boosters crossed. Which is really the problem: You wheel out a statement or theory, then refuse to provide even the most minimal support for your contentions. Anyone who asks for such support is called "abusive." Now you're claiming that Feynman told you something. Feynman left behind extensive notes regarding his Challenger investigation experience. Odd that the "fireball crossing" is not mentioned in any of them. Guess that shows just how much that weighed on his mind. Or was Feynman also bought off by Lockheed? Moe |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
You're a liar.
-- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) Moe Blues wrote in message ... Uh, not to put too fine a point on things, but you've NEVER explained in even vague concepts how the boosters crossed. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
In article , "John Maxson"
wrote: You're a liar. -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) Moe Blues wrote in message ... Uh, not to put too fine a point on things, but you've NEVER explained in even vague concepts how the boosters crossed. See--right here is the absolute classic. The intelligent, rational response would have been, "Well, I posted this back on XX/XX/XX, and, for the record, here's my explanation of how the boosters crossed." Instead, what you serve up as a response is the above. John, you could have the absolute, rock-solid, cast-in-gold, engraved-by-God answers to what happened to Challenger. But as long as your response to ANY question on ANY point is "You're a liar," or "You're abusive," or any of your other stock responses *NOBODY* can take you seriously or even begin to consider your points. Moe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Berndt's Butchery | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 9 | August 28th 03 01:10 PM |
FOIA Data Exposing 51-L Fireball Crossing | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 6 | August 26th 03 10:18 AM |
Why do we care about the crossing? | BenignVanilla | Space Shuttle | 9 | August 16th 03 09:52 AM |
Challenger Salvage Chief Conceded Fireball Crossing | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 31 | July 25th 03 05:54 AM |