How the Maxwell Equations gets rid of Inertia and inertial massChapt16.15 EM-gravity; ISS Experiment #1324 New Physics #1527 ATOM TOTALITY5th ed

Now of all the passages in all of Feynman's writings on physics, I
could not have chosen a better few sentences than this to highlight
the error of Feynman's understanding of gravity and the error of
General Relativity.

On Apr 26, 1:32Â*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
The errors of Feynman on gravity is easily seen in his book "The
Character of Physical Law" 1965.

--- quoting Feynman page 9 of The Character of Physical Law ---

But the motion to keep the planet going in a straight line has no
known reason. The reason why things coast for ever has never been
found out. The law of inertia has no known origin. Although the angels
do not exist the continuation of the motion does, but in order to
obtain the falling operation we do need a force. It became apparent
that the origin of the force was towards the sun.

--- end quote ---

Now I should also dig up where NOVA science tv shows Brian Greene make
this error of gravity and where Carl Sagan makes this error of gravity
and where Einstein makes the error of gravity and where Caltech's The
Mechanical Universe makes this error of gravity. But I should be
economical here because they all made the same error of gravity.

Their error is physics without the velocity of the Sun factored into
the equations. They all assumed the Sun was 0 speed in Space. If the
Sun were truly 0 speed rather than its true speed of 220km/sec, then
Feynman and others were correct. But alas, they are in deep error.

Now the way that Sagan and Greene explain gravity in General
Relativity is that mass bends space and other matter follows the
curvature of that bent space where they show us a trampoline with a
mass in the center bending the curvature of the trampoline matt and
then they roll a beach ball or something near the bent trampoline to
conjure in our minds the act of orbiting the mass at the center.

Or as Feynman expresses as the angels instead of pushing the matter in
a straight line of inertia in space that the angels push the matter
from the sides and in the direction of the sun.

But all of them, Feynman, Sagan, Greene, Einstein, Caltech physicists
of The Mechanical Universe have it wrong in that they make a fatal
physics assumption, and assume the Sun has no speed in Space.

Science does not allow and has no room for assumptions that are
incorrect. The Sun is moving about ten times faster in Space than the
planet Earth is moving in Space. That means gravity must be a force
that changes direction but also increases the "inertia" of Earth so
that its 29km/sec keeps up with the Sun's 220km/sec.

Compare their view of gravity with EM-gravity and see how easily EM-
gravity explains why and how the planets revolve around the Sun. Here
it is in a paragraph.

Explanation: The Sun has huge mass and that mass is proportional to
how many magnetic monopoles the Sun has. Those magnetic monopoles
forms Space around the Sun. So the Sun is Sun is really two things, it
is the Sun plus the Space of the Sun. That space is called the EM-
gravity cell of the Sun. It is a spinning cell and spins on the same
axis as the Sun itself spins on its axis. So that when a planet such
as Earth comes by with linear momentum of 29km/sec and the Sun has
220km/sec, the Sun would leave Earth behind and speed away if Feynman
and others were correct. But the Sun does not leave Earth behind
because of the spin of the rotating EM-gravity cell of the Sun picks
up Earth and forces it to orbit and revolve around the Sun.


For it is linear momentum and speed of the Sun at 220km/sec yet Earth
with only 29km/sec and how in the world can Earth be gravitationally
bound to the Sun. It is so ridiculous that the example of a fighter
jet aircraft upon passing a single engine tiny plane would become
bound to the jet aircraft.

The mistake of Feynman and Einstein and General Relativity is that
they set aside a concept of INERTIA and then pretend to be getting at
the heart of gravity as a force. They separate mass and inertial mass.
They ignore linear momentum. In the words of Feynman "The law of
inertia has no known origin." So the gravity of General Relativity is
basically inertia, yet Feynman admits that inertia is a total fog
patch.

The reason inertia is total fog in General Relativity or for Feynman
is because they never considered that gravity is just electricity and
magnetism of the Maxwell Equations. EM is a force that is 10^40
stronger than gravity. So you can hide a lot of Inertia if your force
is 10^40 stronger, while General Relativity is 10^40 weaker.

So what is Inertia in the Maxwell Equations? Simple, it is the fact
that mass is proportional to magnetic monopoles and so the Sun has
magnetic monopoles that stretch from the center of the Sun clear out
to the edge of the Oort Cloud. And that Sun gravity cell is Space
itself and it is space that is spinning on that axis that forms the
Sun to Oort Cloud. So that when a planet such as Earth has a linear
momentum of 29km/sec speed, it is impossible for Earth to be bound to
the Sun, unless, the Earth is locked to the gravity cell of the Sun
that spins Earth around the Sun.

So in EM-gravity, the Sun-Oort Cloud axis is spinning so fast and is
solid body rotation spin that it takes the meager 29km/sec Earth and
spins it around the Sun of a Sun that has a linear momentum speed of
220km/sec.

So in EM-gravity derived from the Maxwell Equations, we no longer have
these concepts of Inertia or inertial mass because the Maxwell
Equations have no inertia nor inertial mass, for they have only the
laws of EM.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names of all posters which reduces or eliminates most spam and hate
spew and search engine bombing.

Drexel has done a excellent, simple and fair author-archiving of AP
sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies