A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

orbit speeds Ida & Dactyl Chapt16.15 EM-gravity #1310 New Physics#1513 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 22nd 13, 09:00 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default orbit speeds Ida & Dactyl Chapt16.15 EM-gravity #1310 New Physics#1513 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

I need to focus more on the orbital speed of astro bodies and how it
is connected with EM-gravity. You see, in Old Physics, whenever they
did any gravity calculations whether Newtonian gravity or General
Relativity, both fake theories assumed one of the objects was
stationary still in Space. In EM-gravity we never make fake
assumptions for we realize full well that Earth is only going 29km/sec
while the Sun is going 220km/sec and the only way that could be is
that gravity is EM-gravity.

Now EM-gravity is powerful enough of a force for it is EM of the
Maxwell Equations and is 10^40 stronger of a force than either
Newtonian gravity or General Relativity, so that it is able to have a
220km/sec object pull along another object going 29km/sec and stay
stable for billions of years.

Now let me mark out some of the upper and lower bounds of EM-gravity.

ATOM
______

The atom has a radius distance of its electron orbit versus its proton
nucleus radius. The electron to proton distance is approx 10^-11
meters. The proton radius is approx 10^-16 meters. Here we have a
ratio of 10^5 to 1.

Sun to Oort Cloud
_______________

The Sun radius is about 10^6 km.
The Oort Cloud radius for which the Sun by EM-gravity is lock bounded
with has a radius of about
10^11 km for a ratio of 10^5 to 1.

Ida to Dactyl
___________

The asteroids serve as the smallest example of gravity lock bound.
Before these two asteroids were discovered, no-one that I know of ever
thought such could exist. Especially the fact that Ida is moving in
space at 25km/sec to orbit the Sun whereas Dactyl is moving in Space
at a speed of 10m/sec (the speed of a baseball pitch). You see, the
trouble with Old Physics and their Newtonian gravity or General
Relativity, is they never integrate the speed of objects in the force
of gravity. And the way that EM-gravity gets rid of these nettlesome
problems of speed is that EM-gravity is the cause of the variable
speeds. By cause, I mean the Sun forms the Space itself that surrounds
the Sun, which to the Maxwell Equations are called the electric
magnetic field. The Sun forms the Space itself and this Space is
spinning on the same axis as the Sun rotation. So that the spin of
Space allows the planets to move at a slow speed of 29km/sec yet the
Sun itself is moving in Space at 220km/sec. The spinning Space of the
Sun makes Earth have a overall speed, not of 29km/sec but rather 29 +
220 = 249 km/sec.

So now looking at Ida and Dactyl. The smallest gravitationally locked
astro bodies that we know of today. If Newtonian gravity or General
Relativity were true, then it is impossible to have a Ida at 25km/sec
carry and lock into orbit a Dactyl moving at 10m/sec. The only way
that situation could exist is if Ida creates a spinning Space in its
vicinity that locks Dactyl into that spinning Space. And the way that
Ida forms that EM spinning Space is because of mass. Mass is
proportional to magnetic monopoles of the Maxwell Equations.

The mass of Ida is 10^16 kg.
The mass of Dactyl is 10^11kg.
And this is a ratio of 10^5 to 1.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #2  
Old April 23rd 13, 05:47 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Experiment: creating gravity lock Chapt16.15 EM-gravity #1311 NewPhysics #1514 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Experiment: human-made gravity lock

Now this idea of a minimal mass to have gravity lock as seen by the
asteroids Ida and Dactyl, showing us that neither Newtonian gravity
nor General Relativity are true theories of science invokes some
experiments to be performed. Where we go into outer space and imagine
trying to get a gravitational bonded or bounded or lock. The science
literature is poor in terminology of gravity-bounded. The Moon is
gravitationally locked to Earth. The Earth is gravitationally locked
to the Sun. But if EM-gravity is true, there is a minimum set of
conditions in order to have gravity-lock. I mean there must be enough
mass to form a gravity cell of Space, so that Space rotates about an
axis and this spinning causes the locked object to go around in a
closed loop of the main gravity object. That is how you can have a
Dactyl speeding along at a meager 10meters/sec while it is locked to
Ida speeding along at 25km/sec. That is why you have the Sun speeding
along at 220km/sec while Earth, locked to the Sun is going a leisurely
29km/sec.

So in Newtonian gravity or General Relativity, there is no limitations
on gravity lock, but in EM-gravity we must have a mass of at least
10^16kg in order to have enough magnetic monopoles to build a Space
gravity cell that spins on its axis and drags along other objects in
the region of the cell. This would explain why you would have two
asteroids both 10^16 kg moving in parallel and near one another yet
not gravitationally locked, because the gravity cell of one spins
opposite to the gravity cell of the other.

So here is an experiment which may be conducted, but which I suspect
has already been unwittingly carried out without our knowing it. I
mean a spacecraft that releases a object and whether the object
becomes gravitationally locked with the spacecraft. So that in the
prior missions of spacewalk where a tool is released, whether the tool
becomes gravitationally bound to the spacecraft. According to either
Newtonian gravity or General Relativity, the tool should become
gravitationally locked, until the spacecraft fires the engines and
moves away. But, according to EM-gravity, the minimum condition of a
10^16 kg mass is not present to form a spinning Space gravity cell for
the tool to orbit around.

Now it would have been neat if Voyager 1 or 2 had been outfitted with
a small object that can be monitored on Earth and released in its far
off journey and see if it will revolve around the spacecraft as
gravity lock.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jupiter is a pulsar (2002 proof) and caused by EM-gravity on itspoles Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1484 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 April 10th 13 06:15 PM
Solar gravity cell spins at 72.5 days for 1 revolution; Modern dayAntikythera Mechanism Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1473 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 2 April 6th 13 07:10 AM
Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EM-gravity; Gravity-Cell; OrbitalResonance; Spin-Orbit-Coupling #1451 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 April 2nd 13 01:23 AM
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 March 31st 13 08:19 AM
Ida and moon Dactyl tests of gravity; #139; 3rd ed; Atom Totality(Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 August 10th 09 09:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.