NASA JPL Spirit Mars Rover Conspiracy Continued!

January 27, 2005

Daily Mars Spirit Rover Conspiracy Update.

Well, today, after confronted with fundamental results at variance with
expectations, and with large anomalous rock formations demanding further
examination, the Mars rover team continues to turn their camera away
from reality, giving us no pancams at all, and exactly TWO, count them
TWO, high resolution navcams, and one in focus RAT MI and some more
blurry RAT MIs, plus lots of images of the rover arm.

The RAT did show the deepest RAT into the softest material encountered
thus far, and the navcams clearly show that the rocks are clearly
decomposing or corroding in place, and what looks like sand dunes are
clearly the outlines of decomposed or eroded embankments, complete with
internal structure.

So, when is NASA and JPL going to come clean?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...

So, when is NASA and JPL going to come clean?

When are you going to STFU?

Enquiring minds want to know.

BWAHAHAHA

Is there any group you dont post to - I'd like to go there and get away from

your constant pharting....


Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:

January 27, 2005

Daily Mars Spirit Rover Conspiracy Update.

Well, today, after confronted with fundamental results at variance with
expectations, and with large anomalous rock formations demanding further
examination, the Mars rover team continues to turn their camera away
from reality, giving us no pancams at all, and exactly TWO, count them
TWO, high resolution navcams, and one in focus RAT MI and some more
blurry RAT MIs, plus lots of images of the rover arm.

The RAT did show the deepest RAT into the softest material encountered
thus far, and the navcams clearly show that the rocks are clearly
decomposing or corroding in place, and what looks like sand dunes are
clearly the outlines of decomposed or eroded embankments, complete with
internal structure.

So, when is NASA and JPL going to come clean?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

January 28, 2005

Elivs Stik wrote:

Is there any group you dont post to -

Sure - sci.astro.amateur. It's all yours, amateur.

I see you've already posted there a whole five times.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

Whenever someone brings up conspiracy theories, I usually bring
up these scenarios: (in order of probability)

1) Misinterpretation
2) Incompetance
3) Paranoia
4) Malice

I have the highest regard for the MER team, and do not doubt that
they are portraying the highest ethical standards of their professon.

So, I have to conclude that your paranoia is leading your incompetant
brain to misinterpret data in a manner intended to further your immature
attempts to garner attention, perhaps to deflect attention away from your
other deficiencies.

Give it a rest.

regards,
Dar7yl
"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
January 27, 2005

Daily Mars Spirit Rover Conspiracy Update.

Well, today, after confronted with fundamental results at variance with
expectations, and with large anomalous rock formations demanding further
examination, the Mars rover team continues to turn their camera away
from reality, giving us no pancams at all, and exactly TWO, count them
TWO, high resolution navcams, and one in focus RAT MI and some more
blurry RAT MIs, plus lots of images of the rover arm.

The RAT did show the deepest RAT into the softest material encountered
thus far, and the navcams clearly show that the rocks are clearly
decomposing or corroding in place, and what looks like sand dunes are
clearly the outlines of decomposed or eroded embankments, complete with
internal structure.

So, when is NASA and JPL going to come clean?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

February 4, 2005

dar7yl wrote:

So, I have to conclude that your paranoia is leading your incompetant
brain to misinterpret data

What data? There is no spectroscopic data released beyond Sol 90,
and it's already almost Sol 400. The only people that think
that the MER team is doing a great job are the mindless turds
like you, who have to be spoon fed science on the internet.

Give it a rest.

Nope. If anything, I'll be ratcheting it up. Get used to it.

If you didn't like my tabloid style subject lines, well,
you ain't seen nuttin yet, bozo.

I'll have to hand it to them, they finally figured it about
about the pillow forms 'Columbia Hills' so called basalts.

Finally today we are getting into it. No spectroscopy though.

They are deliberately witholding spectroscopy data, jerk.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

wrote in message
oups.com...
February 4, 2005

dar7yl wrote:

So, I have to conclude that your paranoia is leading your incompetant
brain to misinterpret data in a manner intended to further your immature
attempts to garner attention, perhaps to deflect attention away from your
other deficiencies.

What data? There is no spectroscopic data released beyond Sol 90,
and it's already almost Sol 400. The only people that think
that the MER team is doing a great job are the mindless turds
like you, who have to be spoon fed science on the internet.

Give it a rest.

Nope. If anything, I'll be ratcheting it up. Get used to it.

If you didn't like my tabloid style subject lines, well,
you ain't seen nuttin yet, bozo.

I'll have to hand it to them, they finally figured it about
about the pillow forms 'Columbia Hills' so called basalts.

Finally today we are getting into it. No spectroscopy though.

They are deliberately witholding spectroscopy data, jerk.

I would think that they are releasing data in a manner that coincides
with their schedules, workload, and interest. Perhaps if there were some
interesting conclusions to be made, they would make all efforts to verify
their interpretations before willy-nilly spreading half-baked theories and
conjectures.

btw, If you want to insult me, feel free to use wit and intelligence.
By stooping to basal name-calling, you are merely exposing your
lack of sophistication.

regards,
Dar7yl

February 4, 2005

dar7yl wrote:

So, I have to conclude that your paranoia is leading your
incompetant
brain to misinterpret data in a manner intended to further your
immature
attempts to garner attention, perhaps to deflect attention away
from your
other deficiencies.

What data? There is no spectroscopic data released beyond Sol 90,
and it's already almost Sol 400. The only people that think
that the MER team is doing a great job are the mindless turds
like you, who have to be spoon fed science on the internet.

Give it a rest.

Nope. If anything, I'll be ratcheting it up. Get used to it.

If you didn't like my tabloid style subject lines, well,
you ain't seen nuttin yet, bozo.

I'll have to hand it to them, they finally figured it about
about the pillow forms 'Columbia Hills' so called basalts.

Finally today we are getting into it. No spectroscopy though.

They are deliberately witholding spectroscopy data, jerk.

I would think that they are releasing data in a manner that coincides
with their schedules, workload, and interest.

No, they lied, they claimed data releases every 90 sols,
and they are nearing 300 sols behind on the data.
It's a deliberate data embargo, they are hiding something.
Whatever could it be?

Perhaps if there were some
interesting conclusions to be made, they would make all efforts to
verify
their interpretations before willy-nilly spreading half-baked
theories and
conjectures.

Only a total ****ing idiot like you would look at those rocks
and claim there are no interesting conclusions to be made.

No wait, let me guess, you haven't actually looked at them!

btw, If you want to insult me, feel free to use wit and intelligence.
By stooping to basal name-calling, you are merely exposing your
lack of sophistication.

We don't want sophistication, asshole, we want spectroscopy.

Did it ever occur to you that other scientists, many of whom
are US taxpayers, would like to look at the data and come
to their own conclusions? No, probably not, looking at your
usenet posting history, obviously you need to be spoon fed.

Come on, NASA, JPL, what's the deal? Total Befuddlement?

Need some help? Release the data, assholes!

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

"dar7yl" wrote in message
news:IdWMd.552$tU6.134@edtnps91...
wrote in message
oups.com...
February 4, 2005

dar7yl wrote:

So, I have to conclude that your paranoia is leading your incompetant
brain to misinterpret data in a manner intended to further your
immature
attempts to garner attention, perhaps to deflect attention away from
your
other deficiencies.

What data? There is no spectroscopic data released beyond Sol 90,
and it's already almost Sol 400. The only people that think
that the MER team is doing a great job are the mindless turds
like you, who have to be spoon fed science on the internet.

Give it a rest.

Nope. If anything, I'll be ratcheting it up. Get used to it.

If you didn't like my tabloid style subject lines, well,
you ain't seen nuttin yet, bozo.

I'll have to hand it to them, they finally figured it about
about the pillow forms 'Columbia Hills' so called basalts.

Finally today we are getting into it. No spectroscopy though.

They are deliberately witholding spectroscopy data, jerk.

I would think that they are releasing data in a manner that coincides
with their schedules, workload, and interest. Perhaps if there were some
interesting conclusions to be made, they would make all efforts to verify
their interpretations before willy-nilly spreading half-baked theories and
conjectures.

btw, If you want to insult me, feel free to use wit and intelligence.
By stooping to basal name-calling, you are merely exposing your
lack of sophistication.

regards,
Dar7yl


Please do not pet or feed the trolls. It helps them to multiply.

"Mighty Krell" wrote in message
.net...

Please do not pet or feed the trolls. It helps them to multiply.


But, it's so much fun.
They turn to so pretty colours.
Do they do tricks too?

regards,
Dar7yl.