Reflection and Refraction Hmmm Need Better Thinking (O Ya)

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On Sep 19, 10:01 am, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Sep 19, 9:26 am, "David Staup" wrote:









wrote in message

.. .

STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT!

Saul Levy

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has
part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back
for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they
bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19
years TreBert

very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce!

very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when the
material is transmitted through the material!

so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well
anything

as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've gotten
a
lot of laughs..

now take another hit off that bong and chill!

Since you're replying to rabbi Saul Levy as being the resident moron
idiot and FUD-master of mainstream suckology, you've hit the Semite
nail. Good for you.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet

dreaming again guthball?

your responce shows me that your reading comprehension is non existant

I wasn't the dysfunctional Usenet contributor, because that was
clearly you.


chuckle

Painius I was talking about a lab slowing photons going through cold sodium.(not me) They just don't think what very cold sodium will do. Always its the distance covered. Photons CAN NOT SLOW DOWN period. TreBert

Painius My fastest picture ever taken shows a bullet hitting a wine glass Glass not even a crack,but the free electrons giving off a flare of light an inch and a half long.I did not in reality stop the photons any more than the bullet.I stopped action.I froze time. A strobe light can show glass braking as it hits the wine glass I did it a million times faster. TreBert

Ask why imperial thinkers that tell us photons slow down NEVER tell us how they gain energy at get back to c. Fact is they have us beleive its some type of friction My way is the same reason photons from the core of the Sun take 100,000 years to break through the Sun's surface and take just 8 minutes to get to Earth. Get the picture TreBert

On 9/19/2011 10:19 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
Ask why imperial thinkers that tell us photons slow down NEVER tell us how they gain energy at get back to c. Fact is they have us beleive its some type of friction My way is the same reason photons from the core of the Sun take 100,000 years to break through the Sun's surface and take just 8 minutes to get to Earth. Get the picture TreBert


Please explain in detail, 'your way'.












--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

SOUNDS LIKE THE USUAL MUMBO JUMBO TO ME, HVAC!

BEERT IS A SENILE OLD GOAT!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:27:17 -0400, HVAC wrote:

On 9/19/2011 10:19 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
Ask why imperial thinkers that tell us photons slow down NEVER
tell us how they gain energy at get back to c. Fact is they have us
beleive its some type of friction My way is the same reason photons
from the core of the Sun take 100,000 years to break through the Sun's
surface and take just 8 minutes to get to Earth. Get the picture
TreBert


Please explain in detail, 'your way'.

On Sep 19, 3:01*pm, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Sep 19, 10:01 am, "David Staup" wrote:









"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Sep 19, 9:26 am, "David Staup" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT!

Saul Levy

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has
part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back
for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they
bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19
years TreBert

very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce!

very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when the
material is transmitted through the material!

so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well
anything

as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've gotten
a
lot of laughs..

now take another hit off that bong and chill!

Since you're replying to rabbi Saul Levy as being the resident moron
idiot and FUD-master of mainstream suckology, you've hit the Semite
nail. Good for you.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet

dreaming again guthball?

your responce shows me that your reading comprehension is non existant

I wasn't the dysfunctional Usenet contributor, because that was
clearly you.

chuckle

Double ditto, right back at you.

BTW; how's your spelling-101 coming along?

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On Sep 19, 3:01 pm, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Sep 19, 10:01 am, "David Staup" wrote:









"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Sep 19, 9:26 am, "David Staup" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT!

Saul Levy

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has
part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing
back
for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they
bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last
19
years TreBert

very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce!

very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when
the
material is transmitted through the material!

so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well
anything

as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've
gotten
a
lot of laughs..

now take another hit off that bong and chill!

Since you're replying to rabbi Saul Levy as being the resident moron
idiot and FUD-master of mainstream suckology, you've hit the Semite
nail. Good for you.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet

dreaming again guthball?

your responce shows me that your reading comprehension is non existant

I wasn't the dysfunctional Usenet contributor, because that was
clearly you.

chuckle

Double ditto, right back at you.

BTW; how's your spelling-101 coming along?

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

wow you really got me there...chuckle

absorption and re emission dufus

upon absorption speed = zero

slight delay

upon emission speed = C

trip time (through material) is longer because the slight delays add



"G=EMC^2" wrote in message
news:23417306.398.1316485164530.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbdd1...
Ask why imperial thinkers that tell us photons slow down NEVER tell us how
they gain energy at get back to c. Fact is they have us beleive its some
type of friction My way is the same reason photons from the core of the Sun
take 100,000 years to break through the Sun's surface and take just 8
minutes to get to Earth. Get the picture TreBert