ISS: Eaten out of house and home

Eaten out of house and home

Although posters here obviously find its funny, we are running a international
space station on a wing and a prayer...

one day when we loose the station another safety board will condem those
involved.
..
..
End the dangerous wasteful shuttle now before it kills any more astronauts....

I'm fairly certain that some of you may have noticed this topic located
within sci.space.station; Relocation of ISS to ME-L1

Essentially, even though I'm considered the ultimate village idiot by a
few if not all forum insiders, in spite of that title, I'm all for the
likes of salvaging ISS, that is if there's a moon involved in it's
future. Otherwise, the hell with it (make the damn thing reenter over
NYC on the next 4th of July, as they deserve something spectacular
that's not smashing into yet another tall building).

Unfortunately, some may have not identified with this topic or perhaps
dare not since this efffort is growing in spite of certain individuals
that'll bash such topics for sport and/or if possible banish whatever
is outside of their mainstream box. Thus mostly this is another honest
effort at my own capacity, with the jest of it offering something like
the following;

I've previously agreed with many that perceive our extremely old and
mostly cold-war configured shuttles are simply providing more
likelihood of accidents to come, not to mention their truly horrific
impact upon the environment, and that's also excluding the rather pesky
nature of their having to survive our Boeing/TRW Phantom Works ABL team
being airborne at the same time of their reentry that's only improving
the odds of something much worse going a bit further over the edge of
whatever slim safety margin there is.

The prospects of larger and more capable AI/robotic fly-by-rocket
solutions from Russia or perhaps China are simply a must-have, as even
for the prospects of transporting crew there's no need of the usual
flight crew because, there'd be nothing to do unless all three backup
systems failed. Personal reentry pods or coffins would be included as
last resort, which is far better off than anything shuttle related.
Most of what ISS needs is fuel and spare parts, not a crew change every
few months, as 6+ month durations should be sufficient, though
relocated to ME-L1 might suggest annual crew rotation as being the
norm.

BTW; since this ongoing perverted notion of relocating ISS once and for
all somewhere that it'll actually accomplish the most good for science
as well as humanity is a fairly spendy proposition. However, since
it'll only expedite the eventual replacement by the LSE-CM/ISS, I
thought that perhaps I alone could pay for everything related to
getting ISS relocated to ME-L1, or at least I'd be willing to share and
share alike by way of matching funds.

Of what's needed is something on paper (a few reams might actually
become necessary in this case) that we can each sort of take to the
bank for obtaining the necessary billions as advancements upon whatever
this adventure should require. Actually, since this task is getting us
not only back to the moon in style, but most likely providing the one
and only viable alternative as for our team to be getting itself safely
to/from the lunar surface via tether pods. As such I thought perhaps my
good buddy and friends for life (the GW Bush family and the likes of
Dick's Halburton) would cough up the necessary investment bucks. In
fact, a good portion if not everything can be funded by those Saddam
and Osama bin Laden bank and investment accounts that we supposedly
already have control over, thus not one thin dime need be borrowed from
the privet sector or taxpayers, just the usual insiders like Martha
Stewart, ENRON, Arthur Andersen and lo and behold, we'd subsequently
OWN THE FREAKING MOON!

I mean to say; how absolutely good is that, or what?

Regards, Brad GUTH / GASA~IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm

I'm fairly certain that some of you may have noticed this topic located
within sci.space.station; Relocation of ISS to ME-L1

Essentially, even though I'm considered the ultimate village idiot by a
few if not all forum insiders, in spite of that title, I'm all for the
likes of salvaging ISS, that is if there's a moon involved in it's
future. Otherwise, the hell with it (make the damn thing reenter over
NYC on the next 4th of July, as they deserve something spectacular
that's not smashing into yet another tall building).

Unfortunately, some may have not identified with this topic or perhaps
dare not since this efffort is growing in spite of certain individuals
that'll bash such topics for sport and/or if possible banish whatever
is outside of their mainstream box. Thus mostly this is another honest
effort at my own capacity, with the jest of it offering something like
the following;

I've previously agreed with many that perceive our extremely old and
mostly cold-war configured shuttles are simply providing more
likelihood of accidents to come, not to mention their truly horrific
impact upon the environment, and that's also excluding the rather pesky
nature of their having to survive our Boeing/TRW Phantom Works ABL team
being airborne at the same time of their reentry that's only improving
the odds of something much worse going a bit further over the edge of
whatever slim safety margin there is.

The prospects of larger and more capable AI/robotic fly-by-rocket
solutions from Russia or perhaps China are simply a must-have, as even
for the prospects of transporting crew there's no need of the usual
flight crew because, there'd be nothing to do unless all three backup
systems failed. Personal reentry pods or coffins would be included as
last resort, which is far better off than anything shuttle related.
Most of what ISS needs is fuel and spare parts, not a crew change every
few months, as 6+ month durations should be sufficient, though
relocated to ME-L1 might suggest annual crew rotation as being the
norm.

BTW; since this ongoing perverted notion of relocating ISS once and for
all somewhere that it'll actually accomplish the most good for science
as well as humanity is a fairly spendy proposition. However, since
it'll only expedite the eventual replacement by the LSE-CM/ISS, I
thought that perhaps I alone could pay for everything related to
getting ISS relocated to ME-L1, or at least I'd be willing to share and
share alike by way of matching funds.

Of what's needed is something on paper (a few reams might actually
become necessary in this case) that we can each sort of take to the
bank for obtaining the necessary billions as advancements upon whatever
this adventure should require. Actually, since this task is getting us
not only back to the moon in style, but most likely providing the one
and only viable alternative as for our team to be getting itself safely
to/from the lunar surface via tether pods. As such I thought perhaps my
good buddy and friends for life (the GW Bush family and the likes of
Dick's Halburton) would cough up the necessary investment bucks. In
fact, a good portion if not everything can be funded by those Saddam
and Osama bin Laden bank and investment accounts that we supposedly
already have control over, thus not one thin dime need be borrowed from
the privet sector or taxpayers, just the usual insiders like Martha
Stewart, ENRON, Arthur Andersen and lo and behold, we'd subsequently
OWN THE FREAKING MOON!

I mean to say; how absolutely good is that, or what?

Regards, Brad GUTH / GASA~IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com...
I'm fairly certain that some of you may have noticed this topic located
within sci.space.station

We certainly noticed that you once again changed your email address.

Back into the killfile with you.

bob haller wrote:

one day when we loose the station another safety board will condem
those
involved.

dammit would you please say lose instead of loose. The word is lose,
like when did you lose your mind. You make this goddam mistake in almost
every post. You are a ****ing illiterate.

"Revision" k@tdot-com wrote in message
...
bob haller wrote:

one day when we loose the station another safety board will condem
those
involved.

dammit would you please say lose instead of loose. The word is lose,
like when did you lose your mind. You make this goddam mistake in almost
every post. You are a ****ing illiterate.


And you're only figuring this out now? Lose/loose is only the least of
Bob's posting issues.