|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Surface brightness of Mars
What is the surface brightness of Mars? It would be interesting to
compare this figure to that of deep sky objects. Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Surface brightness of Mars
In article ,
M. Tettnanger wrote: What is the surface brightness of Mars? It would be interesting to compare this figure to that of deep sky objects. Mark At about 25" diameter, it's about 490 square arc seconds in area, so one square arc sec is ~6.7 mags fainter than the whole planet. It's at -2.9 now, so its surface brightness is mag +3.8 per square arc second. Yeow. In other words, it's really, really bright! Stuart |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Surface brightness of Mars
Mark At about 25" diameter, it's about 490 square arc seconds in area, so one square arc sec is ~6.7 mags fainter than the whole planet. It's at -2.9 now, so its surface brightness is mag +3.8 per square arc second. Yeow. In other words, it's really, really bright! Yep..600 watts/sq m solar flux (1370 for earth) and an albedo of 0.22 (0.3 earth). The albedo is comparable to earth..... (Venus 0.8!) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Surface brightness of Mars
In article , Paul Schlyter wrote:
[...] Then what about Venus? At superior conjunction it shines at mag -3.5 and has an apparent diameter of 10", which yields an apparent area of some 78 square arcsec. And that gives a surface brightness of mag +1.2 per square arcsec. Oh very nice! Or the Sun: magnitude -26.7, apparent diameter 1800", apparent area 2.5 million square arcsec, surface brightness -10.6 mag per square arcsec. Or take Vega: magnitude 0.0, apparent diameter 0.005", apparent area 1.9E-5 square arcsec, surface brightness -11.2 mag per square arcsec. Hm! I bet Vega is somewhat smaller than .005, since its surface brightness should be higher. Its surface temp is supposed to be ~10000K, while the Sun's is around 6000K or a bit less. So if they're not too far from being blackbodies in total output, the ratio of surface brightnesses should be around (10000/6000)^4 or 7.7, or 2.2 magnitudes. So Vega should be surface brightness -12.4 per square arc sec, giving it an apparent diameter of .005 / sqrt(2.512^1.2) or .0029". At ~8 pc that makes it about 3.5 million kilometers in diameter. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Surface brightness of Mars
Stuart Levy wrote:
In article , Paul Schlyter wrote: [...] Then what about Venus? At superior conjunction it shines at mag -3.5 and has an apparent diameter of 10", which yields an apparent area of some 78 square arcsec. And that gives a surface brightness of mag +1.2 per square arcsec. Oh very nice! Or the Sun: magnitude -26.7, apparent diameter 1800", apparent area 2.5 million square arcsec, surface brightness -10.6 mag per square arcsec. Or take Vega: magnitude 0.0, apparent diameter 0.005", apparent area 1.9E-5 square arcsec, surface brightness -11.2 mag per square arcsec. Hm! I bet Vega is somewhat smaller than .005, since its surface brightness should be higher. Its surface temp is supposed to be ~10000K, while the Sun's is around 6000K or a bit less. So if they're not too far from being blackbodies in total output, the ratio of surface brightnesses should be around (10000/6000)^4 or 7.7, or 2.2 magnitudes. So Vega should be surface brightness -12.4 per square arc sec, giving it an apparent diameter of .005 / sqrt(2.512^1.2) or .0029". At ~8 pc that makes it about 3.5 million kilometers in diameter. Beware the funny nature of magnitudes here - Vega's output comes in a rather different spectral distribution than the Sun's, peaking in the near UV (exact wavelengths for both peaks depend on whether you plot intensity versus wavelength or frequency). And the magnitude scale zero point does funny things in comparing energies at various wavelengths. Not sheer happenstance that there is a magnitude system in which Vega has equal magnitudes in all passbands. Vega has absolute magnitude around +0.6 in the V band, 4.1 mag brighter than old Sol or a factor of 43 in this wavelength band. This still suggests a smaller angular diameter than 0.005" - oh, cool, I see there;s near-IR interferometry by Ciardi et al. giving a limb-darkened profile with diameter 0.00328". Putting these together in a simple way gives a surface brightness of V=-12.7 per square arcsecond. How about that - even higher than the earlier estimate! Now if we Bill Keel were to talk about one of those O3 stars in the Tarantula Nebula... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Mars in opposition: One for the record books (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 3rd 03 04:56 PM |