|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
On 20 Feb 2007 09:49:59 -0800, "Igor" wrote:
On Feb 19, 5:40 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote: This is mainly about 'fields' and the complete absence of them. Imagine if there were only one piece of matter in the whole universe, a single electron. How would you know that it was an electron if it was the only particle anywhere? We know that the electron has an electric field around itself that will repel like charges and attract unlike ones. How can it when it's the only particle in the universe? Its strength tapers off with distance according to an inverse square law. In the physical sense, we have no idea what makes a 'field'. There is no field at all since there can be no test particles to probe it. Now the question we must ask is, what happens as we move further and further away from the electron. As what moves further and further from the "whatever it is"? Does its field strength become infintely weaker and weaker? How would you be able to tell? ...or is there a point where it can be reduced no more and becomes fragmented. In other words, is there a point where the electron field becomes so weak that it can be no longer be reduced in strength? Yes, it's called zero. Can a point be reached where the field of the electron doesn't permanently exist at all? Yes, at infinity. That is if you could measure it, but with only one electron, I guess you're out of luck. ARE FIELDS QUANTIZED? Some are, some aren't. Would there be regions of space where 'field quanta' are so rare that most of that region literally consists of 'absolutely nothing'? In space there are gravitational 'fields', electric fields, magnetic fields and possibly a few that we know nothing about.. No matter where we go in the universe, we will presumeably see distant stars and fall freely under the influence of some gravitational system....so EM is reaching us regularly. ....but is it possible that in very remote space, the fields that make up EM and gravity become literally 'full of holes'? Bad examples. EM and gravity have infinite ranges. My hypothesis says that 'empty' space somewhat resembles felted fibre or foam polystyrene, where the fibrous or plastic bits resemble the field 'quanta' whilst the holes consist of genuine 'nothing'. The holes are very temporary since EM carrying its own fields passes through them continuously, partially destroying them. Hardly a new idea. It seems you got to that party a bit late. Because 'Wilsonian nort-holes' consist of nothing, they have no properties, no geometry, no time. The concept of an infinite nort-hole presents no real problem since the word 'nothing' in reality implies a genuine 'absence of anything' and without anything, the concept of infinity doesn't really exist. But they have to be bounded by something. What are you a pessimist? Thinking only of the holes and not what bounds them. It is possible that huge nort-holes separate all the individual universes that make up space. Anything's possible. Even you coming up with some reasonable physics. But I'm not exactly holding my breath. Light travels through a nort-hole purely ballistically since there is no intrinsic dielectric constant or magnetic permeability there. Maxwell's equations have no relevance in a nort-hole. Light couldn't travel through the hole at all. It would have to stay on the boundary. That's the only place where space is defined. Any attempt to investigate a nort-hole will destroy it. You could never observe them. Period. The 'Wilson Density Threshold' is that at which nort-holes first start to appear. (Note: 'density' refers to both matter and fields, here) As the density decreases, so does the proportion of 'nothing' in any volume. Gotta love your sense of modesty. Indeed, since nort-holes possess no spatial properties, the true volume of what we presently refer to as 'empty space' must be redefined to mean 'that volume actually occupied by field quanta which exist there'. It is a distinct possibility that lengths as well as volumes are effectively 'contracted' in most of intergalactic space. Whatever that means. ....poor fellow.... .....another 'would-be' scientist if he had the ability... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
On Feb 20, 11:11 am, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 20 Feb 2007 09:49:59 -0800, "Igor" wrote: On Feb 19, 5:40 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote: This is mainly about 'fields' and the complete absence of them. Imagine if there were only one piece of matter in the whole universe, a single electron. How would you know that it was an electron if it was the only particle anywhere? We know that the electron has an electric field around itself that will repel like charges and attract unlike ones. How can it when it's the only particle in the universe? Its strength tapers off with distance according to an inverse square law. In the physical sense, we have no idea what makes a 'field'. There is no field at all since there can be no test particles to probe it. Now the question we must ask is, what happens as we move further and further away from the electron. As what moves further and further from the "whatever it is"? Does its field strength become infintely weaker and weaker? How would you be able to tell? ...or is there a point where it can be reduced no more and becomes fragmented. In other words, is there a point where the electron field becomes so weak that it can be no longer be reduced in strength? Yes, it's called zero. Can a point be reached where the field of the electron doesn't permanently exist at all? Yes, at infinity. That is if you could measure it, but with only one electron, I guess you're out of luck. ARE FIELDS QUANTIZED? Some are, some aren't. Would there be regions of space where 'field quanta' are so rare that most of that region literally consists of 'absolutely nothing'? In space there are gravitational 'fields', electric fields, magnetic fields and possibly a few that we know nothing about.. No matter where we go in the universe, we will presumeably see distant stars and fall freely under the influence of some gravitational system....so EM is reaching us regularly. ....but is it possible that in very remote space, the fields that make up EM and gravity become literally 'full of holes'? Bad examples. EM and gravity have infinite ranges. My hypothesis says that 'empty' space somewhat resembles felted fibre or foam polystyrene, where the fibrous or plastic bits resemble the field 'quanta' whilst the holes consist of genuine 'nothing'. The holes are very temporary since EM carrying its own fields passes through them continuously, partially destroying them. Hardly a new idea. It seems you got to that party a bit late. Because 'Wilsonian nort-holes' consist of nothing, they have no properties, no geometry, no time. The concept of an infinite nort-hole presents no real problem since the word 'nothing' in reality implies a genuine 'absence of anything' and without anything, the concept of infinity doesn't really exist. But they have to be bounded by something. What are you a pessimist? Thinking only of the holes and not what bounds them. It is possible that huge nort-holes separate all the individual universes that make up space. Anything's possible. Even you coming up with some reasonable physics. But I'm not exactly holding my breath. Light travels through a nort-hole purely ballistically since there is no intrinsic dielectric constant or magnetic permeability there. Maxwell's equations have no relevance in a nort-hole. Light couldn't travel through the hole at all. It would have to stay on the boundary. That's the only place where space is defined. Any attempt to investigate a nort-hole will destroy it. You could never observe them. Period. The 'Wilson Density Threshold' is that at which nort-holes first start to appear. (Note: 'density' refers to both matter and fields, here) As the density decreases, so does the proportion of 'nothing' in any volume. Gotta love your sense of modesty. Indeed, since nort-holes possess no spatial properties, the true volume of what we presently refer to as 'empty space' must be redefined to mean 'that volume actually occupied by field quanta which exist there'. It is a distinct possibility that lengths as well as volumes are effectively 'contracted' in most of intergalactic space. Whatever that means. ...poor fellow.... ....another 'would-be' scientist if he had the ability... .....like you? *snicker* |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
On Feb 20, 6:00 am, "kenseto" wrote:
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:%8DCh.5320$PD2.1711@attbi_s22... kenseto wrote: The infinity problems that are inherent in the QED equations... Such as? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum...ler-Lagrange_e... Where are you referring to, Seto? The equations in this link are re-normalized equations. The original qed equations before re-normalization contains infinities due to the misconception-conception that the charge of the particle resides within the particle. When the charge is residing within the electron its self energy will become infinite as the distance approaches zero. ....but it predicts correctly, something your theory can't claim. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
Henri Wilson wrote:
This is mainly about 'fields' and the complete absence of them. Imagine if there were only one piece of matter in the whole universe, a single electron. We know that the electron has an electric field around itself that will repel like charges and attract unlike ones. Its strength tapers off with distance according to an inverse square law. In the physical sense, we have no idea what makes a 'field'. Now the question we must ask is, what happens as we move further and further away from the electron. Does its field strength become infintely weaker and weaker? ...or is there a point where it can be reduced no more and becomes fragmented. In other words, is there a point where the electron field becomes so weak that it can be no longer be reduced in strength? Can a point be reached where the field of the electron doesn't permanently exist at all? ARE FIELDS QUANTIZED? Would there be regions of space where 'field quanta' are so rare that most of that region literally consists of 'absolutely nothing'? In space there are gravitational 'fields', electric fields, magnetic fields and possibly a few that we know nothing about.. No matter where we go in the universe, we will presumeably see distant stars and fall freely under the influence of some gravitational system....so EM is reaching us regularly. ....but is it possible that in very remote space, the fields that make up EM and gravity become literally 'full of holes'? My hypothesis says that 'empty' space somewhat resembles felted fibre or foam polystyrene, where the fibrous or plastic bits resemble the field 'quanta' whilst the holes consist of genuine 'nothing'. The holes are very temporary since EM carrying its own fields passes through them continuously, partially destroying them. Because 'Wilsonian nort-holes' consist of nothing, they have no properties, no geometry, no time. The concept of an infinite nort-hole presents no real problem since the word 'nothing' in reality implies a genuine 'absence of anything' and without anything, the concept of infinity doesn't really exist. It is possible that huge nort-holes separate all the individual universes that make up space. Light travels through a nort-hole purely ballistically since there is no intrinsic dielectric constant or magnetic permeability there. Maxwell's equations have no relevance in a nort-hole. Any attempt to investigate a nort-hole will destroy it. The 'Wilson Density Threshold' is that at which nort-holes first start to appear. (Note: 'density' refers to both matter and fields, here) As the density decreases, so does the proportion of 'nothing' in any volume. Indeed, since nort-holes possess no spatial properties, the true volume of what we presently refer to as 'empty space' must be redefined to mean 'that volume actually occupied by field quanta which exist there'. It is a distinct possibility that lengths as well as volumes are effectively 'contracted' in most of intergalactic space. What makes space carrying field quanta different from that which is completely devoid of any is a question that remains to be answered. It is reasonable to assume that space that contains a fields Another manuscript for the stand up comedian? Paul |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message news [snip] http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...WilsonFake.JPG This message is for *your* personal safety, brought to *you* by Dumbledore, the computer of Androcles, having passed my Turing Test using Uncle Phuckwit for a guinea pig. How is my driving? Call 1-800-555-1234 http://www.carmagneticsigns.co.uk/im...l/P_Plates.jpg Worn with pride. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-plate |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I'd revoke Gisse's high school diploma, if I could.
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ... [snip] http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...WilsonFake.JPG This message is for *your* personal safety, brought to *you* by Dumbledore, the computer of Androcles, having passed my Turing Test using Uncle Phuckwit for a guinea pig. How is my driving? Call 1-800-555-1234 http://www.carmagneticsigns.co.uk/im...l/P_Plates.jpg Worn with pride. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-plate |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ... [snip] http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...WilsonFake.JPG This message is for *your* personal safety, brought to *you* by Dumbledore, the computer of Androcles, having passed my Turing Test using Uncle Phuckwit for a guinea pig. How is my driving? Call 1-800-555-1234 http://www.carmagneticsigns.co.uk/im...l/P_Plates.jpg Worn with pride. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-plate |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ... [snip] http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...WilsonFake.JPG This message is for *your* personal safety, brought to *you* by Dumbledore, the computer of Androcles, having passed my Turing Test using Uncle Phuckwit for a guinea pig. How is my driving? Call 1-800-555-1234 http://www.carmagneticsigns.co.uk/im...l/P_Plates.jpg Worn with pride. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-plate |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ... [snip] http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...WilsonFake.JPG This message is for *your* personal safety, brought to *you* by Dumbledore, the computer of Androcles, having passed my Turing Test using Uncle Phuckwit for a guinea pig. How is my driving? Call 1-800-555-1234 http://www.carmagneticsigns.co.uk/im...l/P_Plates.jpg Worn with pride. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-plate |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
The Wilson Theory of Space.
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:EPKCh.305914$aJ.133532@attbi_s21... kenseto wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:%8DCh.5320$PD2.1711@attbi_s22... kenseto wrote: The infinity problems that are inherent in the QED equations... Such as? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum...ange_equations Where are you referring to, Seto? The equations in this link are re-normalized equations. The original qed equations before re-normalization contains infinities due to the misconception-conception that the charge of the particle resides within the particle. When the charge is residing within the electron its self energy will become infinite as the distance approaches zero. Interesting in that QED is *the most successful theory* ever invented by humans. But QED is based on the misconception that the charge is residing within the particle. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does My Convex Space Theory Give Space Expansion the 5th Dimension? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | September 2nd 06 12:41 AM |
Mt.Wilson | Mark F. | Amateur Astronomy | 46 | December 20th 05 03:55 PM |
Perseids from Mount Wilson | Mike Simmons | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | August 16th 05 09:43 PM |
Mt Wilson Record | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | July 29th 05 09:33 AM |
Winter is coming to Mt. Wilson | Matthew Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 16 | November 8th 04 09:18 PM |