A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Technology
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question about Centrifugal Gravity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old February 23rd 11, 12:17 PM posted to sci.space.tech
Peter Fairbrother
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 100
Default Question about Centrifugal Gravity

Sylvia Else wrote:
On 18/02/2011 1:30 AM, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply] wrote:
James wrote:
So a lot of movies, TV shows, illustrations, etc., show spacecraft
generating "gravity" via rotating hull sections. In many cases, this
rotating section spins around a stationary central hull.

The question I have for those more knowledgeable in this area than I
is: What is the connection between these two sections? Obviously
there shouldn't be a physical connection between the two hull sections
(right?). But would this mean space enough between the spinnning hull
and the stationary hull for the interior atmosphere to escape? Or is
it sealed somehow?


If you have separate rotating and non-rotating sections (as in, for
example, the movie "2010"), then yes, you need a rotating air-seal
between them. This takes a bit of effort for the engineers, but is
certainly possible.


Do you have any references describing how it could be achieved? I've
looked, and I cannot find anything.


It can be done at simplest with the kind of rubber seal used in car
engines to keep the oil in, or with various other rotating seals of
greater complexity - but it doesn't usually need to be done.

For instance in a long flight, eg to Mars, you spin up the living
capsule say at one end of a tether and the landing module or whatever at
the other end, and it just stays spinning until a day or two before you
arrive.

For a space station with two sections the airlock between them (you do
want an airlock there!) either mates with the spinning section or with
the stationary section.

When moving from the rotating section the airlock opens to the RS,
people transfer into the airlock, it closes, it unmates with the RS, it
despins, then it mates with the stationary section etc.



In some scenarios the sections should not be in contact, if possible -
the main reason for having two sections is that you want microgravity in
one section and earthlike gravity in the other.

In order to have good microgravity with eg a rotating seal the center of
gravity of the rotating section must be at the center of the seal - but
this causes problems as eg people move around the rotating section. This
also puts pressure on the seal. It may be best to have no actual contact
between the sections, just a transfer airlock.



-- Peter Fairbrother

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about gravity mathematician Astronomy Misc 2 March 19th 10 05:49 AM
Whats difference between Centripetal and Centrifugal force? G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 3 May 5th 09 02:53 PM
Question about centrifugal force and Bernoulli's law. Robert Clark Astronomy Misc 7 August 29th 06 01:56 AM
tides and centrifugal force Paolo Sirtoli Astronomy Misc 0 July 12th 05 11:05 AM
Centrifugal Force? Benign Vanilla Misc 44 July 19th 04 05:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.